Convicted killer James Desborough denied murdering two friends, Claudio Aquilino and Daniel Coleman, whose remains were found burned and dismembered near his Cornwall cabin. Desborough, 40, told a jury at Winchester Crown Court that he had discovered their bodies on his property but admitted to disposing of their remains during a period of intoxication. He described losing all sense of reality and making poor decisions, though he maintained he did not kill either man. Desborough, who identified himself as an unemployed civil engineer, testified that he and Aquilino had lived together in a woodland cabin near St Austell for several months. He claimed Aquilino was paranoid and believed others wanted to harm him. According to Desborough, he found Aquilino’s body hanging from a tree and, in a state of shock, disposed of it in a nearby stream. He later discovered Coleman’s body in the same stream, described as naked, and used a hatchet to cut up the remains, feeling numb by that point. The prosecution argued that Desborough had confessed to a forensic biologist that he enjoyed watching dismemberment scenes in the TV show Dexter. Desborough explained that he had merely mentioned the show after seeing an advertisement for it on a bus. He also admitted to taking Aquilino’s and Coleman’s money after their deaths, stating he likely spent it on alcohol and drugs. Desborough acknowledged that he had previously killed a cellmate while incarcerated in Devon, awaiting trial for the two alleged murders. When asked whether he had killed the cellmate due to the man snoring, he declined to explain. He insisted that the act was out of character and unrelated to the current charges. The defense emphasized that Desborough had no intent to kill either Aquilino or Coleman. He repeatedly denied involvement in their deaths, insisting that the incidents were the result of a series of unfortunate circumstances. A note found by police, in which Desborough wrote, “I’m a killer and ready to execute any predators,” was dismissed by him as creative writing about a fictional character. Prosecutor Ahmed Hossain KC suggested that Desborough might have derived pleasure from killing, pointing out that he was implicated in the deaths of three individuals within a short period. Desborough responded that such claims were unfounded and that the killing of his cellmate was an isolated incident. The trial continues as the court awaits further evidence and testimony. Meanwhile, a separate case involving Terrence King, 60, has concluded with a conviction for murder. King, who had previously pleaded guilty to manslaughter after a deadlocked jury, was found guilty of intentionally driving into a 15-year-old boy named Devon Simmonds-Caines at high speed in Langley, Middleton. The incident occurred on July 22, 2025, when King struck Devon with his car, resulting in fatal injuries. Witnesses reported loud screams in the courtroom following the verdict. King had claimed he intended to block the stolen e-bike Devon was riding, believing he was endangering traffic. However, prosecutors argued that the collision was deliberate, noting that King failed to activate the brakes and continued at nearly twice the speed limit. Footage of the incident showed no braking action, reinforcing the prosecution’s stance that King had chosen to strike Devon intentionally. Despite King’s denial of intent to kill, the jury found him guilty of murder. The judge noted the emotional impact of the verdict, acknowledging the profound grief of Devon’s family. The case highlights ongoing legal proceedings in the region, underscoring the gravity of criminal behavior and its consequences.
3 reports
The Guardian (UK)IndependentCenterFactual 30Objective 4011 days agoJames Desborough, a convicted killer, is on trial for the murder of two friends, Claudio Aquilino and Daniel Coleman, whose remains were found burned and dismembered near his Cornwall cabin. Desborough claims he discovered the bodies on his property and later disposed of them while under the influence of drugs and alcohol. He admitted to concealing the bodies but denied killing Aquilino and Coleman, stating they had died due to 'a series of unfortunate circumstances.' Desborough also confessed to killing a cellmate during his imprisonment in Devon but did not explain the motive. He described himself as homeless and struggling with addiction, and stated that he and Aquilino had previously lived together in a hostel in Newquay before moving to the woodland cabin. During the trial, Desborough addressed claims that he referenced the TV show Dexter, explaining that he merely saw an advertisement for it.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a legal case involving a criminal trial, focusing on the defendant's account and the prosecution's allegations. It does not exhibit clear bias toward either side, providing both the defendant's statements and the prosecution's questions without overtly favoring one perspective.
Why factuality (30): This article covers a different case involving a convicted killer and his friends’ remains, which is unrelated to the Bolton incident. It contains no relevant information about the primary event and is therefore factually inaccurate.
Why objectivity (40): The article is highly subjective and emotionally charged, focusing on a completely different case. It lacks balance and neutrality, showing a clear lack of objectivity.
Sky News (UK)IndependentCenterFactual 30Objective 4017 days agoA man is set to face trial for the alleged murder of a woman, with charges stemming from an incident that occurred weeks after he was reportedly accused of attempting to kill her. The case involves both murder and domestic abuse allegations. The trial is scheduled for next year, indicating that legal proceedings are underway. The victim's death has raised concerns about domestic violence and the potential dangers faced by individuals in abusive relationships. The case highlights the ongoing issue of domestic abuse and the legal processes involved in such cases.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the facts of the case without apparent bias, focusing on the legal process and the nature of the charges. There is no indication of favoritism toward either the defendant or the victim, nor any ideological framing of the event. The content remains neutral in tone and does not sl
Why factuality (30): This article discusses a completely unrelated case involving a man accused of murder and domestic abuse, which is not related to the Bolton incident. It misrepresents the event entirely and introduces false information.
Why objectivity (40): The article is clearly biased and misleading, presenting a fabricated narrative that has no connection to the actual event reported in the primary source. It lacks neutrality and objectivity.
Daily MirrorIndependentCenterFactual 0Objective 015 days agoTerrence King, 60, was found guilty of murder after deliberately driving into 15-year-old Devon Simmonds-Caines at nearly double the speed limit in Langley, Middleton. The incident occurred on July 22 of last year, when King struck Devon, who was riding a stolen e-bike, causing fatal injuries. King initially claimed he was attempting to block the bike rather than harm Devon, but prosecutors argued that his actions were intentional and driven by 'outrage.' After a deadlock in the first trial, King pleaded guilty to manslaughter, but prosecutors secured a retrial, leading to his conviction for murder. During the trial, evidence showed King did not apply brakes before the collision, and footage indicated he drove directly toward Devon without slowing down.
Bias read (Center): The article focuses on a criminal case involving a traffic-related fatality. While the legal proceedings involve judicial processes, the core subject is a crime and its legal outcome, not a political issue. There is no indication of political bias in the framing or emphasis of the story.
Why factuality (0): This article discusses a different case involving a double murder in a prison setting. It is unrelated to the Bolton murder investigation detailed in the primary source document. Therefore, it provides no factual information about the Bolton case.
Why objectivity (0): The article is not about the same event and contains no relevant information about the Bolton incident. As such, it is not objective in relation to the subject matter.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
United Kingdom
