Controversial MLB All-Star Says 'Babe Ruth Never Existed'
MLB player Pete Crow-Armstrong of the Chicago Cubs sparked controversy by suggesting on a podcast that Babe Ruth, one of baseball’s most iconic figures, 'never existed.' During an appearance on Kristin Cavallari’s podcast 'Let’s Be Honest,' Crow-Armstrong shared an unusual opinion, citing a 2024 interview with Seattle Mariners pitcher Tayler Saucedo, who had previously questioned whether Ruth was real due to a lack of historical footage. Crow-Armstrong expanded on this idea, speculating that the evolution of baseball over time might mean that Ruth’s legacy is exaggerated or fabricated. His remarks drew laughter from his co-panelist, Carson Kelly, and comparisons to conspiracy theories were briefly mentioned before shifting topics. The comment has drawn attention, especially after Crow-Armstrong faced backlash from Dodger fans earlier in the season for criticizing them, though he later attempted to soften his stance.
Pete Crow-Armstrong, a Chicago Cubs outfielder and Major League Baseball All-Star, sparked controversy after suggesting during a recent podcast appearance that Babe Ruth, one of baseball’s most iconic figures, may never have existed. The comment came during an episode of Kristin Cavallari’s show Let’s Be Honest, where Crow-Armstrong, along with teammate Carson Kelly, discussed controversial opinions. When asked for an unpopular take, Crow-Armstrong chose to propose that Babe Ruth was a myth rather than a historical figure. The idea initially seemed far-fetched, prompting Crow-Armstrong to preface his statement with, “this is gonna be crazy.” He claimed to have heard similar theories from a Seattle Mariners pitcher named Tayler Saucedo, who had previously suggested that Babe Ruth’s existence could be questionable due to the scarcity of video evidence from his era. Crow-Armstrong expanded on this notion, arguing that if the game has evolved significantly over the decades, it would be reasonable to question whether Ruth, whose career spanned the early 20th century, actually played the sport as described. Crow-Armstrong’s reasoning was rooted in modern perspectives on how the game has changed. He noted that even though Ruth is often depicted as a towering figure in baseball history, the rules and techniques of the game have undergone substantial transformations. By applying contemporary logic to historical context, he argued that it might be possible that Ruth’s legacy was built upon assumptions rather than verifiable records. However, the suggestion was met with skepticism, particularly from his teammate Carson Kelly, who found the claim absurd. During the conversation, Kelly laughed off the idea, calling it “crazy.” The discussion briefly touched on comparisons to moon landing conspiracy theories, but the conversation soon moved on. There was no response from Babe Ruth himself, as the Hall of Famer passed away in 1948. The remarks drew immediate backlash, especially given Crow-Armstrong’s prior comments about Los Angeles Dodgers fans. Earlier this season, while playing in Los Angeles, he had made disparaging remarks toward Dodgers supporters, leading to public criticism. In a subsequent interview with Los Angeles Times writer Maddie Lee, Crow-Armstrong attempted to clarify his stance, saying, “If we’re going to be immature and childish about it, I’d say they started it, they just gave me an opportunity to kind of run with it.” Despite the backlash, Crow-Armstrong’s comments continue to generate debate within baseball circles. While some view the remarks as a provocative attempt to engage with fans, others see them as a troubling disregard for historical accuracy. As the offseason progresses, it remains unclear whether Crow-Armstrong will address the controversy further or if the issue will fade into the background. For now, the focus remains on the broader implications of questioning foundational elements of baseball history.
Go to the primary sources (3)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
MLB player Pete Crow-Armstrong of the Chicago Cubs sparked controversy by suggesting on a podcast that Babe Ruth, one of baseball’s most iconic figures, 'never existed.' During an appearance on Kristin Cavallari’s podcast 'Let’s Be Honest,' Crow-Armstrong shared an unusual opinion, citing a 2024 interview with Seattle Mariners pitcher Tayler Saucedo, who had previously questioned whether Ruth was real due to a lack of historical footage. Crow-Armstrong expanded on this idea, speculating that the evolution of baseball over time might mean that Ruth’s legacy is exaggerated or fabricated. His remarks drew laughter from his co-panelist, Carson Kelly, and comparisons to conspiracy theories were briefly mentioned before shifting topics. The comment has drawn attention, especially after Crow-Armstrong faced backlash from Dodger fans earlier in the season for criticizing them, though he later attempted to soften his stance.
Bias read (Center): The article discusses a controversial sports-related statement but does not involve politics, public policy, or elected officials. It focuses purely on a player's off-field remark and the reaction to it, with no clear ideological framing or bias in the reporting.
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the claim by Pete Crow-Armstrong that Babe Ruth may not have existed, citing his appearance on Kristin Cavallari’s podcast. It also references Brandon Contes’ follow-up about the specific podcast with Tayler Saucedo where similar ideas were discussed. The details align
Why objectivity (75): The article presents the claim in a relatively neutral manner but uses phrases such as 'controversial,' 'out of left field,' and 'lowkey, that's awesome' which introduce a degree of subjectivity. While it does not take a clear stance, the framing leans slightly toward highlighting the absurdity of t
Cubs outfielder Pete Crow-Armstrong, known as PCA, shared a bizarre conspiracy theory during an appearance on Kristin Cavallari’s podcast, suggesting that Babe Ruth, one of baseball’s greatest legends, never actually existed. He cited a claim by former Mariners pitcher Tayler Saucedo, who argued that Ruth’s existence is questionable due to limited available film footage. While it is true that Ruth’s physical presence on film is scarce, due to the limited availability of motion pictures before the 1940s, his life and career were extensively documented through newspapers and firsthand accounts. The article notes that many people who knew Ruth personally are still alive, and his historical impact remains undeniable despite the speculative claims.
Bias read (Center): While the article discusses a controversial and conspiratorial claim, it presents the information neutrally, citing both the claim and the counterarguments based on historical records. The framing does not overtly favor one side over another, maintaining a balanced approach to the discussion.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.