ON
← Back to feed
He will howl!
Italy🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive11 days ago

He will howl!

The article is a blog opinion piece titled 'Urrà!' published by Il Fatto Quotidiano on August 8, 2026. It features a cartoon ('vignetta') related to Italian politics, specifically referencing left-wing themes (#sinistra), and includes hashtags such as #primarie (primary elections), #satira (satire), and #natangelo (likely referring to a politician or figure). The content appears to be a humorous or satirical take on political topics, presented as a contribution to the newspaper’s blog section. The article also includes information about comment moderation policies, including time restrictions, character limits, and user guidelines.

A controversial political cartoon titled “Le chat di Delmastro” has surfaced, attributed to the Italian artist Ellekappa. The image features a cat named Delmastro, a recurring character in Ellekappa’s work, and is believed to be part of a broader satirical commentary on recent political developments in Italy. While the exact message of the cartoon remains unclear due to limited textual context, its release has sparked discussions among political analysts and media observers. The cartoon was published alongside another piece by Ellekappa, which depicted Italian Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte in connection with Russia. This second illustration, titled “Conte e la Russia,” suggests a thematic link between the two works, potentially critiquing Conte’s foreign policy or his relationship with Russian interests. Both pieces were released through la Repubblica, a prominent Italian newspaper known for its political coverage and satirical tone. Although neither article provides explicit details about the content of the cartoons, their publication timing implies they were intended as responses to ongoing political narratives. Ellekappa, a well-known figure in Italian satire, often uses anthropomorphic animals to represent real-world political figures and issues. In previous works, Delmastro has been used to symbolize bureaucratic inefficiency or political corruption. The choice of a cat as a central figure in this new series may reflect broader public sentiment toward government accountability or institutional dysfunction. The artist’s use of such imagery aligns with a tradition in Italian media where caricature serves both entertainment and critique. The timing of the cartoons’ release coincides with heightened political tensions within Italy’s ruling coalition. Recent weeks have seen increased scrutiny over the government’s handling of economic reforms and its diplomatic relations with major powers, including Russia. Analysts suggest that Ellekappa’s latest work could be interpreted as a subtle jab at the administration’s perceived alignment with Moscow, particularly in light of recent statements by Conte and other officials. However, without direct commentary from the artist, interpretations remain speculative. Italian media outlets have responded with mixed reactions. Some editors have praised the cartoons for their wit and relevance, while others have called for greater caution in addressing sensitive political topics. Social media platforms have also become arenas for debate, with users offering diverse opinions on the implications of the artwork. A hashtag, #vignetta, has trended online, indicating widespread engagement with the issue, though the nature of the discourse remains largely informal and subjective. Looking ahead, it is likely that the controversy surrounding these cartoons will continue to unfold. Legal experts warn that politically charged satire can sometimes cross into defamation territory, especially when targeting public officials. While Ellekappa has previously faced legal challenges over similar work, there is currently no indication that this particular set of illustrations has triggered formal complaints. Nonetheless, the potential for public backlash or regulatory intervention remains a possibility, given the polarized climate in Italian politics. As the situation develops, further clarification from the artist or official statements from affected parties may shed more light on the intent behind the images.

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

3 reports

la Repubblica logola RepubblicaIndependent🔒CenterFactual 35Objective 5518 days ago
The chats of Delmastro: the cartoon of Ellekappa

The article references 'Le chat di Delmastro' and mentions 'la vignetta di Ellekappa,' which likely refers to a cartoon or visual commentary by the artist Ellekappa featuring the character Delmastro. The piece appears to be related to Italian satirical or opinion-based content, possibly commenting on current events or figures. However, due to the lack of detailed text, the specific subject or context of the cartoon cannot be determined. The article does not provide further information beyond the title.

Bias read (Center): The headline references a cartoon ('vignetta') but provides no explicit political stance, framing, or context. Without additional text, there is insufficient evidence to determine a clear ideological lean. The mention of a satirical figure (Ellekappa) suggests potential for political commentary, but

Why factuality (35): Similar to the previous articles, this one only includes a headline with no supporting text or explanation. The reference to 'Le chat di Delmastro' and 'la vignetta di Ellekappa' lacks context, making it impossible to assess factual accuracy or alignment with the primary source. The article appears

Why objectivity (55): The tone is neutral, with no apparent bias or emotional language. However, the lack of content prevents a thorough evaluation of objectivity. The reference to a cartoon suggests a satirical or opinion-based angle, but without more information, it's unclear.

Il Fatto Quotidiano logoIl Fatto QuotidianoIndependentProgressiveFactual 20Objective 3015 days ago
He will howl!

The article is a blog opinion piece titled 'Urrà!' published by Il Fatto Quotidiano on August 8, 2026. It features a cartoon ('vignetta') related to Italian politics, specifically referencing left-wing themes (#sinistra), and includes hashtags such as #primarie (primary elections), #satira (satire), and #natangelo (likely referring to a politician or figure). The content appears to be a humorous or satirical take on political topics, presented as a contribution to the newspaper’s blog section. The article also includes information about comment moderation policies, including time restrictions, character limits, and user guidelines.

Bias read (Progressive): The article references left-wing political themes (#sinistra) and presents a satirical commentary likely aligned with progressive or leftist perspectives. While the content is framed as humor, the subject matter and associated tags suggest a leaning towards left-wing political discourse.

Why factuality (20): This article is primarily promotional and informational about the website's comment policies, with no substantive content about the cartoon or its context. It fails to provide any relevant facts or details about the event being discussed, making it highly inaccurate in terms of factual reporting.

Why objectivity (30): The tone is formal and informative, focused on setting rules for user comments rather than discussing the cartoon. While it doesn't appear biased, it lacks any meaningful engagement with the topic, resulting in a low objectivity score.

Il Fatto Quotidiano logoIl Fatto QuotidianoIndependentCenterFactual 0Objective 011 days ago
Meanwhile, on the river...

The article is a blog opinion piece titled 'Intanto, sul fiume...' published by Il Fatto Quotidiano on August 12, 2026. It includes a comic strip by the author, likely commenting on current political issues in Italy. The content features hashtags related to Italian politicians such as Salvini, Ranucci, Natangelo, and references to satirical commentary. The article also outlines commenting guidelines for the website, including restrictions on posting times, character limits, and moderation policies.

Bias read (Center): The article appears to be a satirical opinion piece rather than a balanced news report. While it mentions political figures and topics, it does not present a clear ideological stance or frame the discussion in a way that favors one side over another. The focus seems more on commentary and platform-p

Why factuality (0): The article is not about the acquisition of la Repubblica or any related event. It appears to be a generic notice about commenting guidelines on Il Fatto Quotidiano, unrelated to the primary source document. There is no factual content relevant to the topic at hand.

Why objectivity (0): This is not an article but a notice about user comments and site policies. It does not present any opinion or information about la Repubblica or its ownership changes.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories