ON
← Back to feed
Consumer watchdog was able to list 10 Downing Street as a holiday rental on booking.com
Ireland🏛️ PoliticsCenter9/2/2026

Consumer watchdog was able to list 10 Downing Street as a holiday rental on booking.com

A European consumer watchdog, Which? Travel, successfully created a fake listing for 10 Downing Street on the online travel platform booking.com, highlighting significant vulnerabilities in the site's security system. Despite booking.com's claims of using advanced AI and security measures to prevent fraudulent listings, the watchdog was able to create the listing quickly and even process a payment for a stay at the Prime Minister's residence. The listing remained active for several weeks before being removed, and a fake review was also posted, which was not flagged as inappropriate. Booking.com responded by stating that the test did not represent the typical user experience on their platform and explained that certain fraud detection mechanisms were not activated because the listing was not fully visible to customers.

A UK consumer watchdog successfully listed 10 Downing Street on Booking.com as a holiday rental for two months, allowing a test booking and generating a glowing review. The listing, created by Which? Travel, was intended to expose vulnerabilities in Booking.com's security systems. The fake listing, which included the exact address and a picture of the iconic black door, was uploaded on 18 June and remained active until 27 August. The watchdog set up the listing as part of an investigative effort to assess the effectiveness of Booking.com's anti-fraud measures. It was designed to be highly conspicuous, using one of the world's most recognizable addresses to test whether the platform's automated systems would flag it as suspicious. Despite the obvious nature of the listing, Booking.com allowed it to go live without requiring the researcher to provide proof of ownership or identification. According to the watchdog, such documentation was not necessary until three months after the listing was posted. The listing was configured so that potential guests had to request a stay rather than making a booking automatically. Within 20 minutes of the listing becoming available, 14 individuals inquired about staying at the property. A member of the Which? team was then able to complete a week-long booking, paying for the stay through the platform. However, the booking was later canceled on 31 August, and the watchdog received an email regarding a refund, though it was unclear whether the full amount would be returned. In addition to the booking, the watchdog conducted further tests to evaluate the platform's ability to prevent fraudulent activity. It discovered that the account could be used to send potential guests to external links requesting credit card details. This raised concerns about the risks posed by scammers exploiting such features to deceive users and steal personal information. To amplify the impact of the experiment, Which? Travel left a fake review of its fake listing, giving it a perfect score of 10 out of 10. The review humorously claimed that the stay at 10 Downing Street was an exceptional experience, highlighting the presence of "Larry the Cat." Despite Booking.com's systems indicating that the review would be reviewed by a moderator before publication, it appeared on the platform within minutes. As a result, the prime minister's residence was subsequently rated as "exceptional" on Booking.com. The account associated with the fake listing was eventually removed on 27 August, approximately two months after it was created. Which? Travel editor Rory Boland emphasized that while the findings were amusing, the implications for real users were alarming. He warned that the ease with which the watchdog was able to create a fraudulent listing underscored the potential dangers faced by travelers, who could lose substantial amounts of money to scams or fall victim to phishing attempts. A Booking.com spokesperson responded to the incident, stating that the "limited test does not reflect the experience of millions of listings and reviews on our platform." She explained that the property added by Which? was not "live" or visible to customers during the period referenced and that some automatic fraud controls were not triggered because the property was closed. The company reiterated its commitment to protecting users through a combination of checks, verification processes, and AI-driven technologies, noting ongoing efforts to enhance security against increasingly sophisticated scams.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

TheJournal.ie logoTheJournal.ieIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 909/2/2026
A UK watchdog managed to list 10 Downing Street on Booking.com as a holiday rental for two months

A UK consumer watchdog, Which?, conducted an investigation by creating a fake listing for 10 Downing Street on Booking.com, exposing significant vulnerabilities in the platform's security measures. The listing, which included the exact address and a photo of the iconic black front door, was allowed to go live despite being clearly fake. The watchdog was able to take a booking for a week-long stay and even left a glowing 10-out-of-10 review, highlighting the lack of verification processes. Booking.com later canceled the booking but did not clarify if a refund would be issued. The experiment revealed that the platform's AI systems failed to recognize the obvious nature of the scam, raising concerns about the risks of fraud on such platforms.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report on a security vulnerability discovered by a consumer watchdog, without overtly favoring any political side. It focuses on the technical aspects of the breach and the implications for online booking platforms, rather than taking a stance on political issues.

Why factuality (95): This article mirrors the details from the primary source, including the date of the listing, the method used to create the fake listing, and the outcome of the experiment. It accurately reflects the timeline and the issues raised by Which? Travel regarding Booking.com's security protocols.

Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a balanced tone, reporting the events without apparent bias. However, the use of phrases like 'glowing review' and 'exceptional' could be seen as slightly subjective, though it is presented as a factual account of the fake review.

The Irish Times logoThe Irish TimesIndependent🔒CenterFactual 95Objective 909/1/2026
Consumer watchdog was able to list 10 Downing Street as a holiday rental on booking.com

A European consumer watchdog, Which? Travel, successfully created a fake listing for 10 Downing Street on the online travel platform booking.com, highlighting significant vulnerabilities in the site's security system. Despite booking.com's claims of using advanced AI and security measures to prevent fraudulent listings, the watchdog was able to create the listing quickly and even process a payment for a stay at the Prime Minister's residence. The listing remained active for several weeks before being removed, and a fake review was also posted, which was not flagged as inappropriate. Booking.com responded by stating that the test did not represent the typical user experience on their platform and explained that certain fraud detection mechanisms were not activated because the listing was not fully visible to customers.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of a security vulnerability discovered by a consumer watchdog, focusing on the technical aspects of the breach rather than taking a stance on political issues. It includes balanced quotes from both Which? Travel and booking.com, providing a neutral perspective.

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the experiment conducted by Which? Travel to expose security flaws on Booking.com. It references the primary source document, noting the fake listing of 10 Downing Street, the lack of identity verification, and the delayed removal of the listing. It also mentions the f

Why objectivity (90): The tone remains neutral, presenting the facts without overt bias. However, the phrase 'glaring gaps' suggests some level of criticism, though it is framed as an objective report of findings rather than an opinion.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories