Constanza Hube: The UDI has to have its own identity, clear and out of what Chile would be. Let's go

Constanza Hube, a 40-year-old constitutional law professor and newly elected deputy, has emerged as one of the leading voices within the UDI party's so-called "new generation" of leaders. Her recent comments have sparked discussions about the future direction of the UDI, particularly regarding its identity and potential alliances outside of the former coalition known as Chile Vamos. Hube emphasized that the UDI must establish a clear and distinct identity separate from what would constitute Chile Vamos. She acknowledged the challenges faced by the party due to its past association with a coalition that no longer exists but continues to influence political discourse. This sentiment was echoed by some members who believe that the UDI should distance itself from the legacy of Chile Vamos to redefine its role in national politics. The discussion around the UDI's future came amid speculation about internal leadership dynamics. Hube expressed her honor at being considered for the presidency of the party, though she stressed that the current priority is unity rather than competition among potential candidates. She mentioned that there is still ample time before the scheduled elections in January 2027 and suggested that any candidate should focus on reinforcing the UDI’s identity over personal ambitions or factional interests. Regarding the agreement between Jorge Alessandri and Pablo Longueira, Hube viewed it positively, noting that Longueira's decision to support Alessandri strengthens the UDI's position with a leader who aligns with the party's vision of having a distinct identity beyond Chile Vamos. She pointed out that many still associate the UDI with the defunct coalition, including some leaders from Renovación Nacional. On the topic of forming new coalitions with other parties such as the Republicans, Hube suggested that while formal agreements might not be necessary, there should be a minimum framework of coordination among parties supporting significant government initiatives. She cited examples where non-official parties supported legislative measures, indicating an informal coalition already in place on certain issues. Despite the lack of immediate competition for leadership roles, Hube highlighted the importance of the younger generation having representation in the party's leadership. She argued that presence in the executive committee is less about securing seats and more about influencing the development of a coherent political project that reflects the UDI's granite-like solidity, predictability, and reliability—qualities desired by both members and voters. Her involvement in a working group focused on employment policies led to interpretations suggesting support from the current leadership. However, Hube clarified that this assignment stemmed from her role in the Chamber of Deputies' work commission, given the urgent need to address labor issues. The inclusion of Evelyn Matthei in this commission also drew varied interpretations, with some viewing it as an effort to bring her back into the fold after her critical stance toward the government had caused discomfort within the UDI. The ongoing dialogue within the UDI reflects broader considerations about its strategic positioning in the evolving political landscape. As debates continue about its identity and alliances, the party remains focused on consolidating its image as a reliable force capable of offering stability and clarity amidst the complexities of contemporary governance.