Congress to move Supreme Court against rejection of Meenakshi Natarajan’s Rajya Sabha nomination
The Indian National Congress plans to file a petition with the Supreme Court challenging the rejection of Meenakshi Natarajan's nomination for a Rajya Sabha seat from Madhya Pradesh. The nomination was rejected by the Returning Officer following allegations that Natarajan concealed information about a legal case against her in Hyderabad. Congress leaders, including K.C. Venugopal and Abhishek Manu Singhvi, met with Election Commission officials to seek a reversal of the decision, calling it 'egregious, blatantly unlawful, and detrimental to the democratic process.'
Political tensions have escalated dramatically in recent weeks following the rejection of Meenakshi Natarajan’s nomination for the Rajya Sabha elections in Madhya Pradesh. The incident has sparked a series of accusations, protests, and legal challenges involving multiple political parties and stakeholders. At the center of the controversy is the alleged withholding of information related to a legal notice issued against Natarajan in Telangana, which the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) claims constitutes a criminal case.
The rejection of Natarajan’s nomination occurred after the BJP filed a complaint against her, alleging that she had concealed details of a case against her in Telangana. The Returning Officer in Madhya Pradesh, Arvind Sharma, upheld the objection and rejected her nomination. This decision triggered immediate backlash from the Indian National Congress, which labeled the action as a “murder of democracy” and a case of “seat theft.” Congress leaders, including Meenakshi Natarajan herself, argued that the matter in question was merely a legal notice and not a criminal case. They emphasized that no formal case had been registered against her, and thus, the information was not required to be disclosed in her nomination affidavit.
The situation further complicated when the Supreme Court dismissed Natarajan’s petition challenging the rejection of her nomination, citing Article 329 of the Constitution, which bars judicial interference in electoral matters. The court noted that the appropriate recourse for such disputes lies in the high court through an election petition. Despite this, the Congress continued to push for a review of the decision, arguing that the Returning Officer’s order was arbitrary and violated the principles of fair play in elections.
The political fallout extended beyond the immediate rejection of Natarajan’s nomination. The Congress, fearing potential defections and cross-voting by its lawmakers, organized a mass movement to relocate its members to Karnataka, a state governed by the Congress. This strategic move aimed to prevent the BJP from influencing its legislators and ensuring their presence during the Rajya Sabha elections. The relocation effort included flying lawmakers from Bhopal to Bengaluru in two batches, with plans to return to Madhya Pradesh on June 18, the day of the elections.
Meanwhile, the Telangana state government and its leadership, particularly Chief Minister A. Revanth Reddy, weighed in on the controversy. Revanth Reddy accused the BJP of attempting to establish a one-party electoral system in India, likening their tactics to those of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. He criticized the BJP for moving from “vote theft” to “seat theft” and highlighted the political implications of their actions. Additionally, Revanth Reddy clarified his previous remarks about the BJP and HYDRAA, stating that his comments were misinterpreted and that he never intended to compare himself to Adolf Hitler.
The controversy surrounding Natarajan’s nomination also brought attention to the broader dynamics within the Telangana Pradesh Congress Committee (TPCC). K.T. Rama Rao, the BRS working president, accused Revanth Reddy of backstabbing Natarajan, suggesting that the Chief Minister had shared details of a false case against her with BJP leaders in the state. These allegations underscored the deepening rift between the Congress and the BRS, with both parties accusing each other of undermining democratic processes.
The legal and political dimensions of the issue intersected further when the Supreme Court declined to intervene in the matter, reinforcing the notion that electoral disputes must be resolved through the established legal framework. This decision, however, did not quell the concerns of the Congress, which continues to argue that the rejection of Natarajan’s nomination was politically motivated rather than legally justified. The party’s leaders have expressed their intent to challenge the decision in the high court, emphasizing the need to uphold the integrity of the electoral process.
As the Rajya Sabha elections approach, the political landscape in Madhya Pradesh remains highly charged. The BJP, confident in its numerical advantage, has positioned itself to secure two of the three available seats. Meanwhile, the Congress is rallying its forces, focusing on preventing defections and ensuring a unified front. The outcome of these elections will not only determine the composition of the Rajya Sabha but also reflect the broader political strategies and alliances shaping the nation’s governance. The controversy surrounding Natarajan’s nomination serves as a microcosm of the larger struggles for influence and control within India’s political arena.
Looking ahead, the resolution of this dispute will depend on the legal proceedings in the high court and the subsequent political maneuvering by both the Congress and the BJP. The Supreme Court’s stance on the matter, combined with the potential for a judicial review, will play a crucial role in determining the legitimacy of the rejection of Natarajan’s nomination. As the deadline for the Rajya Sabha elections approaches, the stakes remain high, with the future of democratic practices and electoral fairness hanging in the balance.
29 reports
The HinduIndependentLeftFactual 95Objective 9019 days ago
BRS working president K.T. Rama Rao accused Chief Minister A. Revanth Reddy of betraying AICC in-charge of Telangana Meenakshi Natarajan, leading to the rejection of her nomination papers for the Rajya Sabha election. Rama Rao alleged that Revanth Reddy filed a false case against Natarajan and shared information with BJP leaders. He criticized the Chief Minister's comparison to Hitler and stated that the current government has failed to fulfill its promises.
Bias read (Left): The article presents accusations from KTR, a prominent figure in the BRS party, against the Chief Minister, suggesting a political conflict within the state. The framing emphasizes the actions of the ruling party as negative, using terms like 'heinous politics' and 'utter flop', which indicate a slt
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 90): Factuality is very high as it accurately describes the legal process and court decision. Objectivity is excellent with a neutral tone and focus on procedural aspects.
India TodayIndependentLeftFactual 95Objective 8024 days ago
Meenakshi Natarajan, a Congress leader, accused the BJP of manipulating the Madhya Pradesh Rajya Sabha election after her nomination was rejected due to an alleged non-disclosure of a court matter in Telangana. Natarajan argued that the issue cited against her was a legal notice and not a criminal case. She claimed the BJP introduced the issue as a strategy to counter Congress after failing to secure enough support through cross-voting and political defections.
Bias read (Left): The article presents Meenakshi Natarajan’s accusations against the BJP without significant counterpoints or balanced perspectives from the opposing side. It emphasizes the BJP’s alleged manipulation and frames the rejection of Natarajan’s nomination as a politically motivated move rather than a mere
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 80): Factuality is very high as it accurately reports the events surrounding Natarajan's rejected nomination. Objectivity is good, though there is a slight tilt towards the Congress perspective.
Hindustan TimesIndependentLeftFactual 95Objective 8024 days ago
The Indian opposition party Congress has arranged flights for its lawmakers from Madhya Pradesh to Karnataka ahead of the Rajya Sabha elections, citing concerns about the ruling BJP attempting to 'poach' them. Congress has nominated Meenakshi Natarajan as its candidate for the Rajya Sabha from Madhya Pradesh. The lawmakers are traveling voluntarily, according to their leader Umang Singhar, though the move is seen as a precaution against potential efforts by the BJP to sway them.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the situation as an effort by the BJP to 'poach' Congress lawmakers, using terms like 'poaching politics' which imply unethical behavior by the ruling party. This framing suggests a critical stance toward the BJP and supports the narrative of the opposition Congress being under du
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 80): Detailed and factually sound report on the rejection of Meenakshi Natarajan's nomination. Maintains a balanced perspective between the Congress and BJP positions, with minimal bias.
Hindustan TimesIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 7024 days ago
The Election Commission (EC) has agreed to meet with a delegation from the Indian National Congress following the rejection of Meenakshi Natarajan's nomination for a Rajya Sabha seat in Madhya Pradesh. The nomination was rejected due to allegations that Natarajan concealed information in her affidavit. The BJP candidate Mahesh Kevat filed the complaint against her.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual details without overtly favoring either the Congress or the BJP. It reports on the EC's decision to meet with the Congress delegation and provides background on the reasons for the nomination rejection. There is no evident editorializing or biased language that would tip
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 70): Highly factual account of the EC's response to Congress protests. Objectivity is lower due to the strong language used by Congress leaders describing the situation as a 'murder of democracy.'
The HinduIndependentLeftFactual 90Objective 8520 days ago
The article criticizes the BJP and BRS for allegedly engaging in a misinformation campaign following an incident involving Meenakshi Natarajan's seat. It compares the BJP's actions to those of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un.
Bias read (Left): The article uses strong, critical language towards the BJP, comparing them to Kim Jong Un, which indicates a clear ideological stance against the ruling party. This framing suggests a left-leaning perspective.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): Factuality is excellent as it provides detailed information on the Supreme Court filing. Objectivity is high with balanced reporting on the legal arguments and the political implications.
Hindustan TimesIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8521 days ago
The Supreme Court of India rejected Meenakshi Natarajan's petition challenging the rejection of her Rajya Sabha nomination. The court stated it would not invoke its writ jurisdiction under Article 329.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a legal decision by the Supreme Court without apparent bias. It presents the court's reasoning neutrally, focusing on the legal grounds for rejecting the petition. There is no evident framing that favors one side over another.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): Factual reporting on the EC's involvement and the political reactions. Objectivity is preserved with balanced coverage of both Congress and BJP positions.
Scroll.inIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8522 days ago
Congress has approached the Supreme Court challenging the rejection of Meenakshi Natarajan's nomination for the Rajya Sabha elections in Madhya Pradesh. The nomination was rejected following objections raised by the BJP regarding a criminal case against Natarajan in Telangana. Natarajan claims that her legal representatives were not heard during the process. Congress leaders argued that the case does not constitute a valid criminal charge under the Representation of the People Act.
Bias read (Center): The article presents facts without overtly favoring either political party. It reports on the legal challenge and arguments from both sides without using biased language or selectively omitting perspectives. The framing remains neutral, focusing on procedural aspects and legal interpretations rather
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): Factuality is strong with accurate details on the Supreme Court move and legal arguments. Objectivity remains high with balanced coverage of the political and legal aspects.
Times of IndiaIndependentLeftFactual 90Objective 8524 days ago
The Election Commission is set to meet with a Congress delegation regarding the rejection of Meenakshi Natarajan's nomination for the Rajya Sabha elections from Madhya Pradesh. Congress leaders protested outside the EC office, alleging that the rejection was an attempt by the BJP to undermine the democratic process. KC Venugopal, a Congress leader, criticized the decision as an effort to sabotage the party's candidates.
Bias read (Left): The article presents the Congress party's perspective, using strong language such as 'blatant attempt by the BJP to destroy the democratic process' and 'hollow commitment to the Constitution.' It quotes a senior Congress leader who accuses the BJP of undermining democracy and highlights the party's愤
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): Detailed and accurate background on Meenakshi Natarajan. Objectivity is maintained with neutral presentation of facts and her political significance.
Hindustan TimesIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8524 days ago
Congress leader Meenakshi Natarajan, a candidate for Rajya Sabha elections in Madhya Pradesh, had her nomination rejected after a complaint was filed against her alleging she concealed a pending criminal case. Her opponent, BJP candidate Mahesh Kewat, claimed the case was not disclosed in her affidavit. Natarajan previously served as an MP from 2009 to 2014 and is known as a close aide to Rahul Gandhi.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual details without overtly favoring either political side. It reports on the rejection of a nomination due to legal issues and provides background on the individual involved without apparent bias or loaded language.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): Factual account of the nomination cancellation and political fallout. Objectivity is upheld with balanced reporting on both BJP and Congress actions.
Scroll.inIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8023 days ago
Six Naga men abducted on May 13 by alleged Kuki groups were found dead following a 24-hour search operation by Manipur Police. The incident occurred amid tensions between Kuki and Naga communities, with at least 48 civilians reported kidnapped. Meanwhile, the Congress party challenged the rejection of their Rajya Sabha candidate, Meenakshi Natarajan, arguing that a criminal case cited by the BJP had not been formally recognized by the court. Trinamool Congress leader Sushmita Dev also resigned from her position as a Rajya Sabha MP.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual updates on two separate events without overtly favoring any political side. It reports on the recovery of bodies and ongoing investigations related to abductions, as well as the political dispute over a Rajya Sabha candidate's rejection. No clear ideological framing or o
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 80): Factuality is strong as it accurately reports on the SIR exercise and concerns raised by Asghar Chulbul. Objectivity remains high with balanced reporting on the implications of the revision process.
The HinduIndependentLeftFactual 90Objective 7524 days ago
In Madhya Pradesh, the nomination of Congress candidate Meenakshi Natarajan for a Rajya Sabha seat was rejected during scrutiny, leading to protests by Congress leaders outside the Election Commission of India's office. The situation arose amid concerns over potential cross-voting by Congress MLAs who had traveled to Bengaluru. Natarajan accused the BJP of shifting tactics from 'vote theft' to 'seat theft', citing the party's alleged misuse of electoral processes.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the incident as an attack on democratic processes by the BJP, using terms like 'vote theft' and 'seat theft' which imply wrongdoing by the opposition. It highlights the actions of the Congress party and quotes their accusations against the BJP without presenting counterpoints or a
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 75): Faithful to the primary source on the rejection of Meenakshi Natarajan's nomination and the BJP's allegations. Objectivity is somewhat compromised by the emotional language used in quoting Congress leaders.
The HinduIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 7524 days ago
Meenakshi Natarajan, a Congress candidate, has been named as a respondent in a private legal petition filed by a former TDP leader who later joined the Congress party. The petition was filed in 2025 in Hyderabad against several Congress leaders, including Natarajan, over alleged misconduct.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It reports on a legal matter involving a political figure without taking a stance on the allegations or the parties involved.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 75): Facts about potential cabinet reshuffle and BJP organizational changes are accurately reported. Objectivity is slightly affected by speculative nature of the content.
Hindustan TimesIndependentLeftFactual 90Objective 7524 days ago
Congress leaders criticized the BJP for rejecting the nomination papers of their candidate Meenakshi Natarajan for the Rajya Sabha elections. They claimed that Election Commission officials refused to meet them when they sought to challenge the decision, leading to a protest outside the Election Commission's office. The Congress accused the BJP of attempting to manipulate the Rajya Sabha election and subverting previous elections in Madhya Pradesh.
Bias read (Left): The article presents the Congress party's accusations against the BJP regarding alleged manipulation of the Rajya Sabha election and subversion of previous elections in Madhya Pradesh. The framing emphasizes the BJP's actions as problematic and highlights the Congress's stance without providing a nu
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 75): Accurate description of Congress moving MLAs to Karnataka. Objectivity is affected by the emotionally charged accusations against the BJP and the emphasis on 'poaching' tactics.
The HinduIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 7525 days ago
In Madhya Pradesh, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has fielded Mahesh Kewat, an OBC leader from the Bundelkhand region, for one of three Rajya Sabha seats. This follows Congress candidate Meenakshi Natarajan filing her nomination. In response, the Congress party is considering relocating some of its MLAs to states where it holds power, such as Karnataka or Telangana, to avoid potential defections.
Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced account of both parties' actions without overtly favoring one side. It reports on the BJP's decision to field a candidate and the Congress's strategic considerations without using biased language or emphasizing one perspective over the other.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 75): The article provides detailed information about the BJP's candidate and Congress' considerations, matching the primary source. It maintains a neutral tone, though it slightly emphasizes the Congress' concerns without fully presenting BJP's position. Factuality is high, objectivity is moderate.
The HinduIndependentCenterFactual 88Objective 6023 days ago
Meenakshi Natarajan, the Congress candidate for a Rajya Sabha seat in Madhya Pradesh, had her nomination rejected following allegations of hidden information related to a legal case in Telangana. The rejection came after objections raised by BJP candidate Mahesh Kewat and State party general secretary Rahul Kothari. The Congress accused the opposition of orchestrating a 'premeditated conspiracy' and planned to approach President Droupadi Murmu for intervention. Meanwhile, the BJP candidate is expected to win unopposed, securing all three seats.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the Congress and BJP perspectives without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from both parties and does not use loaded language or omit key context. The framing appears balanced, with no clear indication of bias toward one political group over another.
Why these scores (Factual 88 · Objective 60): Reports on the SIR process and includes quotes from officials. However, it frames the issue through the lens of potential voter disenfranchisement, suggesting a partisan perspective.
Scroll.inIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8024 days ago
Congress has transported several of its Madhya Pradesh MLAs to Karnataka ahead of the Rajya Sabha elections scheduled for June 18. The move comes amid concerns over potential disruption by the BJP. The Congress is currently in power in Karnataka but is part of the opposition in Madhya Pradesh. The assembly has 230 members, with the BJP holding 164 MLAs and Congress holding 63. The BJP needs 116 votes to secure two of the three Rajya Sabha seats, while Congress could potentially win the third seat.
Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced overview of the situation without overtly favoring either the Congress or the BJP. It reports on the movement of MLAs, the political context, and the electoral arithmetic without using biased language or selectively citing sources.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): Factuality is high as it provides relevant details about the political maneuvering. Objectivity is good, though there is a slight emphasis on the Congress' actions.
The HinduIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7523 days ago
The Indian National Congress plans to file a petition with the Supreme Court challenging the rejection of Meenakshi Natarajan's nomination for a Rajya Sabha seat from Madhya Pradesh. The nomination was rejected by the Returning Officer following allegations that Natarajan concealed information about a legal case against her in Hyderabad. Congress leaders, including K.C. Venugopal and Abhishek Manu Singhvi, met with Election Commission officials to seek a reversal of the decision, calling it 'egregious, blatantly unlawful, and detrimental to the democratic process.'
Bias read (Center): The article presents facts without overtly favoring any side. It reports on the actions of the Congress party and their response to the rejection of a nomination, citing statements from both the party and the affected individual. There is no evident editorializing or biased language that would skew.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 75): Factuality is good as it reports on the rejection of the nomination and the controversy. Objectivity is slightly lower due to the emotional tone and focus on the Congress' grievances.
NDTVParty-alignedRightFactual 85Objective 7024 days ago
The article discusses Mahesh Kewat's candidacy for a Madhya Pradesh Rajya Sabha seat, noting that his selection by the BJP is not solely based on caste identity but also includes religious and regional factors.
Bias read (Right): The article frames the BJP's choice of candidate through the lens of symbolic value tied to religion and region, which aligns with the party's strategy of leveraging identity markers for political advantage. The emphasis on 'symbolism' suggests a narrative that supports the BJP's broader ideological
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): Factual accuracy is high regarding BJP's strategy, but the article presents a biased interpretation of Mahesh Kewat's candidacy, emphasizing religious and regional symbolism without sufficient evidence. Objectivity is compromised by the selective framing of the BJP's approach.
The HinduIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7025 days ago
The Karnataka government has increased minimum wages by 60% across 81 sectors, setting different rates for Bengaluru and smaller towns. The move aims to address rising living costs in urban areas. The Labour Minister stated the revision followed Supreme Court guidelines, highlighting the legal framework for minimum wage determination. The article notes disparities in wage enforcement across states, attributing it to employer influence and labor department complicity. Employers argue higher wages could fuel inflation.
Bias read (Center): The article presents facts about wage increases and mentions both government actions and employer concerns without overtly favoring one side. It includes quotes from officials and references legal frameworks, maintaining a balanced tone.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): Factual claims are generally accurate but the tone is clearly critical of the TVK government, showing bias towards the DMK's perspective.
Times of IndiaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 6524 days ago
Ahead of the Rajya Sabha elections in Madhya Pradesh, the Indian National Congress has relocated its MLAs to Karnataka, which is under Congress rule, to prevent potential cross-voting. Congress leaders accused the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) of attempting to 'poach' their legislators through financial incentives. A meeting was held where nearly 60 MLAs were informed of the relocation plan. Some MLAs reportedly expressed reluctance, but the decision was made by the party leadership.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the Congress and BJP perspectives without overtly favoring either side. It reports allegations from Congress leaders regarding BJP's attempts to influence MLAs and includes quotes from multiple sources within the Congress party. There is no clear indication of biased phrasе
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 65): The article accurately reports on Congress shifting MLAs to Karnataka ahead of Rajya Sabha polls, aligning with the primary source. However, it presents the Congress perspective with some emotional language ('poaching attempts') and lacks balance by not mentioning BJP's stance. Objectivity is lower
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
India
