More than a year after the Mexican Secretariat of Public Education (SEP) established new mandatory guidelines to prevent and address sexual violence in schools, implementation has lagged nationally. Only nine states have protocols aligned with these new standards, according to the federal repository. On September 7, basic education schools across Mexico held their second 'Jornada de Concientización sobre la Gravedad del Abuso Sexual y el Maltrato Infantil' ('Day of Awareness of the Severity of Sexual Abuse and Child Maltreatment'), titled 'Te escucho, te comprendo, te protejo.' The event took place a week into the new school year, aiming to critically reflect on the role of schools in preventing, detecting, and addressing such issues. The SEP’s ‘Escuela Libre de Violencia’ repository lists protocols from Aguascalientes, Baja California Sur, Chiapas, Guerrero, Michoacán, Nayarit, Oaxaca, Puebla, and Sinaloa as current under the agreement number 17/05/25. Other states have related documents but do not appear under this specific category of validity. The agreement required local and municipal educational authorities to create or update their protocols to align with the new regulations
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the implementation status of policies by the SEP regarding sexual violence prevention in schools. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the progress and gaps in
Why factuality (80): The article accurately reports on the lack of harmonized protocols in most states and mentions the second iteration of the awareness day. It references the 9 states with updated protocols, which aligns with the source’s emphasis on the slow implementation of preventive measures. However, it omits sp
Why objectivity (80): The article presents facts objectively, noting both progress and shortcomings without overtly favoring any perspective. The tone is informative but could have included more context on the significance of the delay in implementing these protocols.






