Nthabiseng Zandile Nzama, one of five accused in the Vusimuzi 'Cat' Matlala trial, requested to be excused from parts of the trial to focus on her studies. She argued that much of the evidence presented did not relate to her and that attending court was draining her physically and mentally. Her request was denied by Judge Cassim Moosa, who emphasized that criminal proceedings typically require the accused to be present. The trial involves multiple charges including attempted murder, conspiracy, money laundering, and firearm offenses linked to alleged hit plots orchestrated by Matlala. The state plans to start its case with the shootings and will later connect Nzama to the crimes through evidence such as a vehicle previously registered in her name.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the legal arguments made by both the defense and the prosecution without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from the accused and the judge, providing balanced perspectives on the legal reasoning behind the court's decision. There is no evident editorializing
![[EDITORIAL] Ang patlang sa retoriko at realidad ni Pangulong Marcos](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=newsinfo.inquirer.net%2Ffiles%2F2026%2F07%2FTULFO_ULET.mp4.00_03_26_16.Still001.png&w=3840&q=75&output=webp&we)


