This column argues that the upcoming US-South Korea security meeting can be delayed pending the outcome of the US midterm elections, which will significantly influence President Donald Trump's foreign policy trajectory. The author notes that several nations, including Iran, Russia, and Canada, have successfully stalled negotiations or extracted concessions by waiting for the post-election period, anticipating that Trump's authority may weaken if the Democrats gain power. In this context, South Korean President Lee Jae Myung has similarly deflected immediate US demands, specifically refusing to deploy troops to the Strait of Hormuz for combat roles. While acknowledging potential indirect implications of adjusting naval operations, the piece suggests these issues can be addressed later once the conflict involving Iran concludes.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames US President Trump's policies as 'self-defeating' and 'aggressive,' portrays other leaders as successfully 'resisting' him, and presents the delay of security commitments as a strategic success rather than a diplomatic risk.




