ON
← Back to feed
Collins Did Not ‘Support’ OBBBA’s Medicaid Cuts, as Democratic Ad Claims
United States🏛️ PoliticsCenter11 days ago

Collins Did Not ‘Support’ OBBBA’s Medicaid Cuts, as Democratic Ad Claims

Senator Susan Collins, a Republican, opposed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) in July 2025 due to its proposed Medicaid cuts, despite having previously supported a procedural vote to move the bill forward. A Democratic-sponsored ad falsely claimed Collins 'supported' the bill, which includes significant reductions in Medicaid funding. The ad, produced by Affordable Maine, uses a quote from a May 2025 blog post claiming the OBBBA represents the 'largest Medicaid cut in U.S. history.' However, Collins explicitly voted against the final version of the bill, citing concerns over its impact on Medicaid recipients. The Congressional Budget Office estimated the bill would reduce federal Medicaid spending by over $900 billion over ten years and increase the number of uninsured Americans by 7.5 million.

Sen. Susan Collins did not support the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), despite claims by a Democratic campaign ad that she did, according to FactCheck.org. The ad, produced by the group Affordable Maine, falsely asserted that Collins “voted to support Donald Trump on the largest Medicaid cut in history.” This claim contradicts public records showing that Collins opposed the bill, citing its adverse effects on Medicaid as the primary reason. The OBBBA, introduced in early 2025, proposed sweeping changes to the U.S. healthcare system, including significant reductions in federal Medicaid spending. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projected that the law would decrease Medicaid funding by over $900 billion over a decade. These cuts would result in approximately 7.5 million more Americans becoming uninsured, according to the CBO's analysis. Despite these projections, the bill advanced through Congress, eventually becoming law under President Donald Trump. Collins, a Republican senator representing Maine, played a key role in the legislative process. On July 1, 2025, she joined 47 Democratic senators and two Republicans, Thom Tillis and Rand Paul, in voting against the OBBBA. Her opposition was rooted in concerns over how the legislation would affect Medicaid, a critical component of the U.S. healthcare infrastructure. In a statement released that day, Collins emphasized the importance of Medicaid as a safety net for vulnerable populations, including children, seniors, and low-income families. She noted that nearly a third of Maine’s residents rely on the program and warned that the proposed cuts could jeopardize the viability of rural hospitals. Collins acknowledged that some aspects of the OBBBA were beneficial, particularly the extension of tax relief for families and small businesses. However, she maintained that the Medicaid provisions were too severe and posed a serious threat to public health. Specifically, she highlighted the potential loss of $5.9 billion in Medicaid funding for Maine over the next ten years. She also expressed concern over the elimination of certain energy-saving incentives and tax credits, though these were not central to her decision to oppose the bill. Before the final vote on the OBBBA, Collins participated in a procedural vote on June 28, 2025, which determined whether the bill should move forward. She cast a “yes” vote, aligning with 50 other senators. This procedural vote allowed the bill to reach the Senate floor for debate. It was a strategic move, as the bill required only a simple majority to proceed, and Collins believed that the broader implications of the legislation warranted further scrutiny. The bill ultimately passed when Vice President JD Vance, serving as president of the Senate, cast the deciding vote to break a 50-50 deadlock. After the Senate approved the measure, the House of Representatives passed an amended version of the bill, and President Trump signed it into law on July 4, 2025. Affordable Maine, the group behind the misleading ad, has spent over $473,000 on advertising efforts since August 12, 2025, according to AdImpact. The ad features an intensive care unit nurse who claims to have witnessed patients being financially ruined by rising healthcare costs. The nurse accuses Collins of supporting Trump’s policies that led to the largest Medicaid cut in history. However, the ad fails to acknowledge that Collins explicitly opposed the bill and did not endorse the policy changes it proposed. As the election approaches, Collins faces a tough race against Democrat Troy Jackson, a former state Senate president. The controversy surrounding the OBBBA and its impact on Medicaid continues to shape the political landscape in Maine.

Go to the primary sources (4)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

FactCheck.org logoFactCheck.orgIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8011 days ago
Collins Did Not ‘Support’ OBBBA’s Medicaid Cuts, as Democratic Ad Claims

Senator Susan Collins, a Republican, opposed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) in July 2025 due to its proposed Medicaid cuts, despite having previously supported a procedural vote to move the bill forward. A Democratic-sponsored ad falsely claimed Collins 'supported' the bill, which includes significant reductions in Medicaid funding. The ad, produced by Affordable Maine, uses a quote from a May 2025 blog post claiming the OBBBA represents the 'largest Medicaid cut in U.S. history.' However, Collins explicitly voted against the final version of the bill, citing concerns over its impact on Medicaid recipients. The Congressional Budget Office estimated the bill would reduce federal Medicaid spending by over $900 billion over ten years and increase the number of uninsured Americans by 7.5 million.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the issue: the claim made by the Democratic ad and the rebuttal provided by Senator Collins. It does not favor one side over the other, providing factual context about Collins' voting record and the content of the OBBBA. The article avoids loaded language and gives

Why factuality (85): The article accurately describes Sen. Collins' position and corrects the misleading claim in the Democratic ad. It references the Congressional Budget Office's estimate of the Medicaid impact, aligning with cross-source consensus that the ad misrepresents her stance. However, it does not provide ful

Why objectivity (80): The article presents the facts neutrally, explaining the context of the ad and its inaccuracies. While it highlights the misleading nature of the ad, it maintains a balanced tone without overtly criticizing the ad's sponsor or using emotionally charged language.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories