A member of the Mosta Club made the most appearances in the assembly, the leader of the opposition made five appearances.

Net.hrIndependentCenter11 hr. ago

The article reports on the frequency of speech by members of the Croatian Parliament (Sabor) during the spring session, which ran from January 15th to July 1st. Independent representative Josip Jurčević of the Most Party was the most active speaker, participating 530 times, averaging over six times per day. Other notable speakers include Damir Barbir (Centar) with 452 participations and Dalibor Paus (IDS) with 342. The data is not final, as the session continued for nine more days after July 1st. Some representatives, like Marin Corva and Vladimir Bilek, spoke very few times, while others, such as Željko Reiner and Siniša Hajdaš Dončić, had slightly higher participation. The article notes that many speeches were replies or responses to other speakers, and highlights instances where parliamentary rules were violated.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual statistical data on parliamentary speech frequency without overt ideological slant. It objectively lists the number of times various politicians spoke, including both prominent figures and those with minimal participation. There is no evident attempt to favor one party,

Index.hrIndependentCenter11 hr. ago

The article reports on the most active members of the Croatian Parliament (Hrvatski Sabor) during the spring session, which ran from January 15th to July 1st. Independent representative Josip Jurčević of the Most Party was the most vocal, speaking 530 times over 84 days, averaging more than six times per day. Other notable speakers included Centar's Damir Barbir (452 times) and IDS's Dalibor Paus (342 times). Marin Miletić of Most was among the most active in the autumn session, speaking 260 times in half the session period. The data is not final as the session continued for nine additional days after July 1st. Over 10,000 total speeches were recorded, with a significant portion being replies and responses. Some representatives, such as independent Marin Corva and Vladimir Bilek, spoke very few times, while others like Siniša Hajdaš Dončić (SDP) spoke five times. The article highlights both high levels of participation and disparities in engagement across different parties and representatives.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual statistical data on parliamentary speech frequency without overtly favoring any particular political group or ideology. It objectively lists the number of speeches by various representatives, including those from different parties and independent members, without using褒贬

N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenter11 hr. ago

The article from Hrvatska (HR) reports on the most active members of the Croatian Parliament during the spring session, which ran from January 15th to July 15th. Independent representative Josip Jurčević was the most active, speaking 530 times over 84 days, averaging more than six times per day. He was followed by Centar's Damir Barbir with 452 speeches and IDS's Dalibor Paus with 342. Other notable speakers included Marin Miletić from Most, Anka Mrak-Taritaš from GLAS, and Marijana Puljak from Centar. The data is not final as the session continued for nine additional days after July 1st. Over 23 representatives spoke over 100 times, while 17 spoke fewer than ten times. Notably, independent Marin Corva, who joined the parliament late, did not speak at all. The article also notes that some representatives, such as Vladimir Bilek and others, spoke very few times, highlighting variations in parliamentary activity.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual statistical information about parliamentary speech frequency without overtly favoring any particular political group or ideology. It objectively lists the number of speeches by various MPs, including those from different parties and independent candidates, without using褒

Večernji listIndependentCenter12 hr. ago

The article reports on statistical data from the Croatian Parliament (Sabor) regarding the frequency of parliamentary speeches during the spring session, which ran from January 15th to July 1st, 2026. It highlights that out of the total number of interventions, 2,155 were related to violations of the Rules of Procedure, with the president of the Sabor, Gordan Jandroković, stating that 99% of these cases involved misuse of the institution. The most active MPs are noted, including Josip Jurčević (Most) who spoke 530 times, followed by Damir Barbir (Centar) with 452 interventions and Dalibor Paus (IDS) with 342. Other notable speakers include Marin Miletić (Most), Anka Mrak-Taritaš (GLAS), and Marijana Puljak (Centar). Conversely, 17 MPs spoke less than ten times, with some, like Marin Corva, not speaking at all. The data is not final as the session continued for nine more days after July 1st.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual statistical data on parliamentary speech activity without overtly favoring any particular political group or ideology. While it identifies specific MPs and their levels of participation, it does not frame the information in a way that suggests a clear ideological leaning

HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicCenter12 hr. ago

During the spring session of the Croatian Parliament (Hrvatski Sabor), which ran from January 15 to July 15, independent MP Josip Jurčević was the most active speaker, making 530 interventions over 84 days of plenary sessions—an average of more than six per day. He was followed by Damir Barbir (Centar) with 452 interventions and Dalibor Paus (IDS) with 342. Among those who spoke over 200 times were Marin Miletić (Most) and Anka Mrak-Taritaš (GLAS). The data provided does not include all interventions, as it covers only discussions up to July 1, and the parliament continued sitting for nine additional days. Over 10,000 total interventions were recorded during this period, with more than half consisting of replies and responses to other speakers. The president of the parliament noted that over 99% of the 2,155 instances of procedural violations were considered abuses of the institution.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data on parliamentary activity without overtly favoring any political group or individual. It provides statistics on the number of interventions made by various MPs, including both major and minor parties, and includes information on procedural violations. There is no明显的