ON
← Back to feed
CJI vows intervention if Supreme Court metro station stays shut amid CJP protest
India🏛️ PoliticsCenteryesterday

CJI vows intervention if Supreme Court metro station stays shut amid CJP protest

The Chief Justice of India (CJI), Surya Kant, expressed his willingness to intervene if the Supreme Court Metro station remains closed beyond lunchtime, following concerns raised by the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) regarding disruptions caused by the closure during student protests. The SCBA highlighted that the shutdown of multiple Delhi Metro stations, including the Supreme Court station, significantly hindered access for lawyers, litigants, and court staff. During a meeting with the CJI, SCBA President Vikas Singh proposed a restricted-access system allowing only authorized personnel to exit the station after security checks. The CJI confirmed that the Supreme Court administration had already engaged with the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) to resolve the issue and emphasized that no adverse judicial actions would be taken solely due to the Metro closure. Earlier, the CJI had refused to expedite a petition concerning police action against student protesters at Jantar Mantar.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

2 reports

India Today logoIndia TodayIndependentCenteryesterday
CJI vows intervention if Supreme Court metro station stays shut amid CJP protest

The Chief Justice of India (CJI), Surya Kant, expressed his willingness to intervene if the Supreme Court Metro station remains closed beyond lunchtime, following concerns raised by the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) regarding disruptions caused by the closure during student protests. The SCBA highlighted that the shutdown of multiple Delhi Metro stations, including the Supreme Court station, significantly hindered access for lawyers, litigants, and court staff. During a meeting with the CJI, SCBA President Vikas Singh proposed a restricted-access system allowing only authorized personnel to exit the station after security checks. The CJI confirmed that the Supreme Court administration had already engaged with the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) to resolve the issue and emphasized that no adverse judicial actions would be taken solely due to the Metro closure. Earlier, the CJI had refused to expedite a petition concerning police action against student protesters at Jantar Mantar.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the situation, focusing on the administrative and logistical challenges posed by the Metro shutdown without taking a clear ideological stance. While the issue involves political actors (student protests, police action), the framing remains neutral, avoiding

Hindustan Times logoHindustan TimesIndependentCenteryesterday
SC may hear plea on closure of metro stations if authorities fail to act: CJI

The Chief Justice of India (CJI), Surya Kant, indicated that the Supreme Court may intervene judicially if authorities do not resolve the issue of closed metro stations affecting access to the court. The Supreme Court metro station and several others were shut due to heightened security measures following protests by supporters of the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP). This has created significant challenges for lawyers, court staff, and litigants trying to reach the court. The CJI stated that administrative directives have been issued to find a solution, and if no progress is made by lunchtime, the court will consider taking action. Senior advocate Vikas Singh highlighted the disruption caused by the closures and proposed allowing verified legal professionals to use the stations under certain conditions.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the situation, quoting both the CJI and the Supreme Court Bar Association representative. It outlines the problem, the steps taken by authorities, and potential judicial interventions without showing clear favoritism toward any side. The framing remains non

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories