CJI Kant says ‘no plea’ filed on ‘police violence’ during CJP’s Parliament march

Times of IndiaIndependentCenter9 hr. ago

Nirmala Sitharaman, India's Finance Minister, stated that the government did not prevent students from protesting against the NEET exam paper leaks. She emphasized that the government allowed protests to proceed while simultaneously working to conduct a re-examination of the exams and penalize those responsible for the leaks. Sitharaman explained that the delay in responding to student protests was due to the need to ensure the re-examination was completed promptly to avoid disrupting an entire academic year. She also noted that Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan resigned after the successful completion of the re-examination, which she described as a necessary step. Additionally, Sitharaman highlighted concerns about inflation in India, citing both external factors like El Niño and internal issues such as inadequate rainfall affecting water availability.

Bias read (Center): The article presents statements from a high-ranking government official regarding the handling of student protests and the NEET exam issue. The content is balanced in its presentation of the government's actions and explanations, without overtly favoring one side over another. There is no clear bias

Hindustan TimesIndependentProgressiveyesterday

Rahul Gandhi, leader of the opposition in the Lok Sabha, accused Home Minister Amit Shah of being directly responsible for the alleged use of pellet guns against students during a protest. The protest, linked to the NEET paper leak controversy, led to the resignation of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan. Gandhi claimed the government accepted all demands of the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP), including withdrawing legal cases against protesters. However, Delhi police denied using pellet guns, while Gandhi presented a witness alleging pellet injuries. He called for strict action against those involved in the incident and demanded Prime Minister Narendra Modi apologize to students.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the protest as a legitimate expression of dissent and criticizes the government's handling of the situation. It emphasizes accountability of officials like Amit Shah and calls for governmental reforms. The language suggests a left-leaning perspective by portraying the government's

The HinduIndependentCenter2 days ago

On July 20, a protest organized by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) turned violent as security personnel used lathis and tear gas to disperse demonstrators attempting to reach Parliament. Two days later, Chief Justice of India Surya Kant stated that no formal petition had been filed with the Supreme Court regarding alleged police brutality during the event, criticizing 'reckless' media reports suggesting otherwise. The CJI emphasized that only a legal representation, not a formal petition, had been received, and he dismissed claims that the court had refused to consider the issue. This followed a previous refusal by the Supreme Court to initiate suo motu proceedings on an oral request by advocate Narendra Mishra, who had presented video evidence of alleged police misconduct. The Delhi High Court subsequently ordered the Union government and Delhi Police to respond to petitions alleging excessive force, directing them to preserve relevant records like CCTV footage.

Bias read (Center): While the incident involves a politically sensitive issue of police conduct during protests, the article presents a balanced account of the judicial response and media criticism without overt ideological slant. The focus remains on factual clarification rather than advocacy for any particular side.

NDTVParty-alignedCenter3 days ago

A protest has been organized by individuals who claim the demonstration is focused on seeking justice for students impacted by a recent controversy. The demonstrators assert that the issue at hand pertains specifically to students and should not be politicized. However, the article does not provide further details regarding the nature of the controversy or the specific actions taken during the protest.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the protesters' perspective without overtly endorsing or criticizing their stance. It does not clearly frame the issue as politically charged or take a definitive position on whether the matter should be politicized. The lack of explicit commentary on the political implications,

The HinduIndependentProgressive3 days ago

On July 24, 2026, educational institutions across Telangana observed a shutdown following a bandh call by left-aligned student unions, including SFI, AISF, NSUI, PDSU, AIFDS, AIPSU, and AISB. The protest demanded the resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan and fair compensation for affected students. As part of the strike, student groups planned a rally from Narayanguda to Y junction in Hyderabad. Many schools closed, and Osmania University postponed exams scheduled for the day.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the bandh call as a legitimate protest led by left-affiliated student unions, emphasizing their demands against a central government minister. While it reports the event neutrally, the focus on left-aligned organizations and their specific grievances suggests a slight leftward sl抗