The article analyzes the political dynamics involving Zoran Stevanović, leader of the Resnica party, and his impact on Prime Minister Janez Janša's coalition. It notes that despite controversies surrounding Stevanović, including legal convictions and scandals among Resnica MPs, his party has provided crucial support to the ruling right-wing coalition. The piece questions whether Stevanović's actions ultimately harm or benefit Janša's government, highlighting the paradox that Stevanović's radicalism might make the governing right seem more moderate by contrast. However, it raises concerns about the sustainability of this arrangement, suggesting that the cost of maintaining Resnica's five parliamentary seats could eventually become too high.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced analysis of the political situation, examining both potential harms and benefits of Stevanović's influence on Janša's coalition without overtly favoring either side. It uses neutral language and does not exhibit clear bias toward one political faction over another.
Why factuality (75): The article provides general information about Zoran Stevanović's political role and mentions legal convictions and scandals within the Resnica party. It references the formation of a fourth Janez Janša government and Stevanović's position as the first man in parliament. However, it lacks specific d
Why objectivity (70): The article presents a somewhat analytical perspective but uses phrases like 'radicalism' and 'political paradox' which may imply a certain viewpoint. While it attempts to remain neutral by posing questions, the framing suggests an interpretation rather than strictly presenting facts.




![[Video] Aljuš Pertinač: If Janša is passive, the opposition has problems (Echo weekly, 16 October 2026)](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=www.domovina.je%2Fslike%2Fmedium%2Fmaxresdefault-62.jpg&w=3840&q=75&output=webp&we)

