ON
← Back to feed
Circus at the 1999 murder trial: Gilja demands that Turudić be removed from the case
Croatia🏛️ PoliticsProgressive3 hr. ago

Circus at the 1999 murder trial: Gilja demands that Turudić be removed from the case

The article discusses the ongoing retrial of Krešimir Gilja, who was initially convicted in 1999 for shooting Hrvatski povratnik Mirko Rimac and injuring two others. His defense attorneys, Višnja Drenški Lasan and Lea Ćavić, have requested the exclusion of several state prosecutors, including Davora Mlinarić Žagi, Jurica Ilić, and the chief state prosecutor Ivan Turudić. This move comes just 38 days before the statute of limitations expires for Gilja’s case. The defense argues that the state prosecutors have shown partiality by failing to act on a criminal report against another suspect, Domagoj Novak, who allegedly confessed to the crime and handed over the gun used. Additionally, the defense claims that the state prosecutors have not taken steps to dismiss the charges related to Gilja’s injuries of Iva Jurić and Berigoj Vukojević, despite those charges having expired under the statute of limitations. The defense asserts that the state prosecutors are responsible for the case throughout the judicial hierarchy and lack impartiality.

1 reports

Index.hr logoIndex.hrIndependentProgressive3 hr. ago
Circus at the 1999 murder trial: Gilja demands that Turudić be removed from the case

The article discusses the ongoing retrial of Krešimir Gilja, who was initially convicted in 1999 for shooting Hrvatski povratnik Mirko Rimac and injuring two others. His defense attorneys, Višnja Drenški Lasan and Lea Ćavić, have requested the exclusion of several state prosecutors, including Davora Mlinarić Žagi, Jurica Ilić, and the chief state prosecutor Ivan Turudić. This move comes just 38 days before the statute of limitations expires for Gilja’s case. The defense argues that the state prosecutors have shown partiality by failing to act on a criminal report against another suspect, Domagoj Novak, who allegedly confessed to the crime and handed over the gun used. Additionally, the defense claims that the state prosecutors have not taken steps to dismiss the charges related to Gilja’s injuries of Iva Jurić and Berigoj Vukojević, despite those charges having expired under the statute of limitations. The defense asserts that the state prosecutors are responsible for the case throughout the judicial hierarchy and lack impartiality.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the legal proceedings in a manner that emphasizes the alleged partiality of the state prosecutors, particularly highlighting their failure to act on a potential alternative suspect and their continued pursuit of charges that have legally expired. The tone suggests skepticism of an

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories