ON
← Back to feed
Cybercrime: US empowers private companies to counter hackers
AR🏛️ PoliticsProgressive9 days ago

Cybercrime: US empowers private companies to counter hackers

The article discusses the new U.S. strategy under Donald Trump that allows private companies to participate in counterattacks against cybercriminals, particularly those involved in ransomware attacks. This shift marks a significant change from previous state-led operations, where intelligence agencies or military forces were primarily responsible. The strategy involves collaboration between private firms and U.S. federal departments like the Department of Justice and Homeland Security. The move has raised concerns about potential international escalation, especially since countries like China and Russia already allow private sector involvement in similar operations. Experts warn that this could lead to a global cyber conflict, affecting critical infrastructure such as electricity and water systems.

The U.S. government has announced a new strategy allowing private companies to take part in counterattacks against cybercriminals, marking a significant shift in its approach to cybersecurity. This policy, introduced under President Donald Trump’s administration, enables businesses to collaborate with federal agencies such as the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security in targeting cyber threats. The move comes amid growing concerns over ransomware attacks and other forms of digital crime that have increasingly targeted corporations, public institutions, and critical infrastructure. According to reports from U.S.-based journalists, this change represents a departure from previous practices where state-run intelligence services and military units were primarily responsible for responding to cyber threats. Under the new framework, private entities will be permitted to engage directly in offensive operations against cybercriminal networks, though they must work under the supervision of designated federal authorities. The initiative was outlined during discussions with local media outlets, including Perfil, where journalist Norman Powell explained how the policy aligns with broader efforts to combat cybercrime more aggressively. Previously, the U.S. had maintained a strict separation between private-sector involvement and direct action against cyber threats. However, the new directive allows selected private firms to participate in coordinated strikes against malicious actors. These firms would operate under the oversight of the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security, ensuring that all actions remain within legal boundaries. The decision reflects a growing recognition of the scale and complexity of modern cyber threats, which often require rapid and adaptive responses beyond traditional law enforcement capabilities. The policy has raised concerns among experts regarding potential international repercussions. Some analysts warn that the U.S. move could trigger a broader escalation in cyber conflicts, particularly given that countries like China and Russia have long allowed private entities to play a role in cyber operations. Powell noted that there is apprehension that increased U.S. activity could provoke retaliatory measures from other nations, potentially leading to a destabilizing cycle of cyber retaliation. He emphasized that while the focus is currently on disrupting ransomware schemes and other financial crimes, the implications extend far beyond economic harm. Critical infrastructure systems, such as power grids, water treatment facilities, and transportation networks, are also at risk. Cybersecurity experts have warned that these systems are increasingly vulnerable to sophisticated attacks that can disrupt essential services. Powell highlighted that the evolving nature of cyber threats means that the lines between criminal activity and national security are becoming harder to define. As a result, the U.S. is seeking to broaden its response mechanisms to include both public and private sectors in addressing these challenges. The implementation of this policy will likely involve careful coordination between federal agencies and participating private firms. While specific details about which companies will be eligible remain unclear, the process is expected to follow rigorous vetting procedures. The goal is to create a more dynamic and responsive system capable of countering emerging cyber threats before they escalate into major incidents. As the policy takes shape, further developments are anticipated, particularly in terms of how it will interact with existing international norms and agreements governing cyberspace.

1 reports

Perfil logoPerfilIndependentProgressiveFactual 75Objective 609 days ago
Cybercrime: US empowers private companies to counter hackers

The article discusses the new U.S. strategy under Donald Trump that allows private companies to participate in counterattacks against cybercriminals, particularly those involved in ransomware attacks. This shift marks a significant change from previous state-led operations, where intelligence agencies or military forces were primarily responsible. The strategy involves collaboration between private firms and U.S. federal departments like the Department of Justice and Homeland Security. The move has raised concerns about potential international escalation, especially since countries like China and Russia already allow private sector involvement in similar operations. Experts warn that this could lead to a global cyber conflict, affecting critical infrastructure such as electricity and water systems.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the U.S. strategy as a controversial expansion of executive power, emphasizing the risks of international escalation and drawing comparisons to authoritarian regimes. It highlights concerns over privacy, security, and democratic values, which align with left-leaning perspectives.

Why factuality (75): The article accurately reports the U.S. strategy allowing private companies to engage in counter-cyberattacks under Trump's administration. It cites Norman Powell as a source and aligns with general consensus from other articles about the policy change. However, some details like the specific scope

Why objectivity (60): The article presents the information relatively neutrally but includes a section titled 'Esto no les gusta a los autoritarios' which introduces an opinionated statement about authoritarian figures being bothered by professional journalism. This section slightly skews the tone away from strict neutra

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories