ON
← Back to feed
Chinese expert criticizes Filipino FM's claim that Japan-Philippines delimitation 'nothing to do' with China, warns move serves ulterior purposes beyond bilateral talks
CN🏛️ PoliticsProgressive6/11/2026

Chinese expert criticizes Filipino FM's claim that Japan-Philippines delimitation 'nothing to do' with China, warns move serves ulterior purposes beyond bilateral talks

A Chinese expert criticized Philippine Foreign Minister Maria Theresa Lazaro's assertion that maritime delimitation talks between the Philippines and Japan are unrelated to China, arguing that the discussions involve areas near Taiwan and violate international law, particularly the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). The expert highlighted three legal violations: the talks would create obligations for a third state (China), contradict UNCLOS principles of equitable delimitation, and breach international obligations of restraint and good faith. Lazaro defended the talks as essential for national defense and dismissed China's objections, while also expressing concerns about increased Chinese naval activity near Taiwan. The dispute reflects broader tensions in the region, with Japan and the Philippines advancing their claims despite China's opposition.

1 reports

Global Times logoGlobal TimesState / PublicProgressive6/11/2026
Chinese expert criticizes Filipino FM's claim that Japan-Philippines delimitation 'nothing to do' with China, warns move serves ulterior purposes beyond bilateral talks

A Chinese expert criticized Philippine Foreign Minister Maria Theresa Lazaro's assertion that maritime delimitation talks between the Philippines and Japan are unrelated to China, arguing that the discussions involve areas near Taiwan and violate international law, particularly the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). The expert highlighted three legal violations: the talks would create obligations for a third state (China), contradict UNCLOS principles of equitable delimitation, and breach international obligations of restraint and good faith. Lazaro defended the talks as essential for national defense and dismissed China's objections, while also expressing concerns about increased Chinese naval activity near Taiwan. The dispute reflects broader tensions in the region, with Japan and the Philippines advancing their claims despite China's opposition.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the Philippines' actions as legitimate and justified, while criticizing China's stance as obstructionist and legally unsound. The emphasis on international law and the critique of China's position reflect a left-leaning perspective that supports the Philippines and Japan's efforts

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories