ON
← Back to feed
Chaos at Schengen borders: airports simply turn off EES biometrics
Germany🏛️ PoliticsCenteryesterday

Chaos at Schengen borders: airports simply turn off EES biometrics

The European Union's ambitious Entry-Exit System (EES), designed to streamline border management through automated biometric data collection at Schengen area borders, has faced significant challenges during peak travel season. Despite being fully implemented since April 2026, the system has caused long queues and missed connecting flights at major airports like Paris, Amsterdam, Frankfurt, Brussels, and Milan. To prevent gridlock, airport operators and border authorities have resorted to temporarily disabling the biometric component of the system, reverting to manual checks. This practice is legally permitted under EU regulations, which allow for exceptions during extreme congestion. The issue stems partly from the need to register all non-EU travelers for the first time, requiring additional time and personnel. Airlines such as Air France-KLM and Lufthansa have reported delays impacting passengers, prompting temporary exemptions until September 6.

Chaos has erupted at Schengen borders as major European airports have resorted to disabling the new Entry Exit System (EES) biometric checks during peak travel times. The automated system, designed to manage border control more efficiently for non-EU nationals entering the Schengen area, has instead led to long queues and missed connecting flights. To prevent gridlock, airport operators and border authorities have increasingly turned to a legally permitted emergency measure, temporarily deactivating the collection of biometric data such as fingerprints and facial scans. The EES was launched in October 2025 and fully implemented by April 10, 2026. However, its rollout has faced challenges during the summer high season, when passenger volumes surge. When lines grow too long at border checkpoints, the system is suspended. According to reports, this practice has become common at several major European hubs, including Paris, Amsterdam, Frankfurt, Brussels, and Milan. Instead of using the automated kiosks for full registration, officials manually verify documents in abbreviated form. This emergency measure falls within the legal framework set by the EU’s EES regulation, which explicitly allows for special provisions under exceptional circumstances to maintain passenger flow during extreme traffic surges. The European Commission granted such a temporary exemption for the summer months under pressure from the travel industry. This exception officially expires on September 6. The decision to allow these exceptions stems from intense feedback from the aviation sector. Lufthansa CEO Carsten Spohr recently described how passengers were missing connecting flights due to delays caused by the entry system. In Frankfurt, the airline had to implement the emergency measure in coordination with German authorities after waiting times became unreasonable. The exemption applies not only to air travel but also to sea ports, road crossings, and international train stations. The origins of the EES trace back to 2017, when the system was approved by the European Parliament as part of the Smart Border Program. Multiple postponements occurred because border authorities lacked both technical readiness and sufficient personnel. A primary cause for current delays lies in the initial registration process: since the system is new, nearly every traveler from third countries must be fully registered for the first time. This requires not only time at terminals but also substantial staff resources. Control teams at key points such as Milan’s Malpensa Airport have long complained of being overwhelmed. Maintaining regular EES operations would require significantly more personnel during peak times. At Brussels Airport, just a few kilometers from the European Commission headquarters, the emergency rule was already invoked earlier this year. Within 21 hours, approximately 600 passengers missed their flights. Despite the temporary shutdowns, border authorities emphasize that security within the Schengen area remains intact. Travelers continue to be recorded in the EES, and their travel documents are systematically checked. Only the time-consuming collection of fingerprints and facial images is temporarily suspended. The European Commission continues to defend the system, stating it enhances citizen safety and replaces outdated manual stamping procedures. Nevertheless, eight EU member states and Switzerland have already requested modifications to the system.

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

heise online logoheise onlineIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 65yesterday
Chaos at Schengen borders: airports simply turn off EES biometrics

The European Union's ambitious Entry-Exit System (EES), designed to streamline border management through automated biometric data collection at Schengen area borders, has faced significant challenges during peak travel season. Despite being fully implemented since April 2026, the system has caused long queues and missed connecting flights at major airports like Paris, Amsterdam, Frankfurt, Brussels, and Milan. To prevent gridlock, airport operators and border authorities have resorted to temporarily disabling the biometric component of the system, reverting to manual checks. This practice is legally permitted under EU regulations, which allow for exceptions during extreme congestion. The issue stems partly from the need to register all non-EU travelers for the first time, requiring additional time and personnel. Airlines such as Air France-KLM and Lufthansa have reported delays impacting passengers, prompting temporary exemptions until September 6.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the technical and logistical issues with the EES, citing both the implementation challenges and the legal framework allowing temporary exemptions. It includes perspectives from airlines and mentions the EU Commission’s role without overtly favoring any side

Why factuality (75): The article accurately reports that the EES system has caused delays and that airports have temporarily disabled biometric data collection during peak times. It references Politico as a primary source and aligns with the reported issues. However, it does not mention the specific suspension at Charle

Why objectivity (65): The tone leans slightly towards criticism of the EES system, using terms like 'Nadelöhr' (choke point) and 'Kollaps im Urlaubsverkehr' (collapse in holiday traffic). While it presents facts objectively, there is a subtle editorial bias against the system.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories