Changwon asks public how to save its $24 million ‘ugly’ landmark

Changwon, a city in South Gyeongsang Province, has launched a nationwide contest to seek public input on how to revitalize the controversial 40-meter-tall Big Tree observation structure in Daesang Park. The structure, which cost 34.4 billion won ($24.4 million) to build, has become a focal point of public debate since its unveiling last year. The city announced the initiative on Sunday, inviting citizens across South Korea to submit ideas aimed at improving the building's appearance, functionality, and integration within the park. The Big Tree was initially designed as a modern landmark meant to symbolize Changwon's urban renewal efforts. However, the final version of the structure diverged significantly from early blueprints, leading to widespread public dissatisfaction. During a two-week trial period in August, 85 percent of 1,868 participants surveyed expressed negative opinions about its visual appeal. Many criticized the design, with some calling for its complete demolition. This backlash forced the city to delay its official opening, originally planned for October 1, indefinitely. The controversy surrounding the Big Tree extended beyond aesthetic concerns. In June, following an internal audit, Changwon authorities requested police intervention to investigate the private developer responsible for the project. The probe focused on allegations of inflated construction costs, raising questions about transparency and financial accountability in municipal projects. These developments further fueled public discontent and highlighted broader issues of governance and oversight in local government initiatives. In response to mounting pressure, the city has opted to engage the public directly in shaping the future of the Big Tree. The contest, open until September 2, invites submissions from individuals and groups across the country. Proposals should address practical aspects such as design enhancements, structural safety, user accessibility, and alternative uses for the facility. A panel will evaluate entries, with winners likely to be announced in September. Any approved suggestions could influence future redesigns or modifications to the structure. City officials have acknowledged that while the contest aims to generate innovative solutions, the extent of financial commitment remains undetermined. Details regarding potential funding for proposed improvements have not been finalized. Even under the most optimistic scenarios, the official opening of the Big Tree is expected to be postponed well past the current year. This uncertainty underscores the complexity of balancing public expectations with administrative constraints. The Big Tree continues to occupy a central role in discussions about urban development and civic engagement in Changwon. Its fate reflects broader challenges faced by cities striving to balance ambitious infrastructure projects with community values and fiscal responsibility. As the contest unfolds, the outcome may serve as a case study in how municipalities can navigate public dissent and adapt to evolving social priorities. For now, the focus remains on gathering diverse perspectives to guide the next phase of this ongoing process.