ON
← Back to feed
Changes to Form 6 not made by court; post-retirement immunity to CEC not given to even judges: Supreme Court
India🏛️ PoliticsCenter8 hr. ago

Changes to Form 6 not made by court; post-retirement immunity to CEC not given to even judges: Supreme Court

On October 5, 2026, the Supreme Court of India clarified that it did not authorize changes made to Form 6, a document used for voter registration during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. These modifications, which required new voters to provide information linking them to previous registrations, were implemented unilaterally by the Election Commission of India (ECI). During hearings on petitions seeking the suspension of Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar, the court emphasized that any changes to Form 6 must follow formal legislative procedures rather than administrative decisions. The justices also discussed the legal immunity granted to the CEC and Election Commissioners under the 2023 Act, noting that this protection extends beyond their tenure but does not apply to judges. Senior advocate Vikas Singh argued that the CEC’s elevated status could undermine democratic principles, though the court cautioned against disrupting election processes.

4 reports

The Hindu logoThe HinduIndependentCenter8 hr. ago
Changes to Form 6 not made by court; post-retirement immunity to CEC not given to even judges: Supreme Court

On October 5, 2026, the Supreme Court of India clarified that it did not authorize changes made to Form 6, a document used for voter registration during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. These modifications, which required new voters to provide information linking them to previous registrations, were implemented unilaterally by the Election Commission of India (ECI). During hearings on petitions seeking the suspension of Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar, the court emphasized that any changes to Form 6 must follow formal legislative procedures rather than administrative decisions. The justices also discussed the legal immunity granted to the CEC and Election Commissioners under the 2023 Act, noting that this protection extends beyond their tenure but does not apply to judges. Senior advocate Vikas Singh argued that the CEC’s elevated status could undermine democratic principles, though the court cautioned against disrupting election processes.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the Supreme Court's clarification regarding changes to Form 6 and discusses legal debates around the CEC's immunity. It includes perspectives from both the court and petitioners without overtly favoring one side. The language remains neutral, focusing on legal arguments and the

Deccan Herald logoDeccan HeraldIndependentCenter10 hr. ago
From removing Form 6 declaration to capping Form 7 submissions: All changes EC made in last three weeks amid SIR row

The Election Commission of India (EC) has implemented several procedural changes in the last three weeks amid internal disagreements within the commission. These changes include modifying the Declaration Form attached to Form 6, which is used for registering new voters, particularly in non-Special Intensive Revision (SIR) states. The EC also announced a special summary revision in 17 states and union territories, aiming to include eligible voters who were previously removed during the SIR process. Additionally, the EC plans to provide machine-readable voter lists in PDF format to recognized political parties and candidates during elections upon request and payment of fees. There are caps on the number of Form 7 applications an individual voter can submit during different phases of the electoral process. The EC also mandated that annual performance appraisal reports for all officers be completed by December 31 each year and required approval for officers' foreign travel.

Bias read (Center): The article provides a factual account of procedural changes made by the Election Commission without overtly favoring any political side. It outlines the actions taken by the EC in response to internal disputes but does not present biased language or selective information that would indicate a clear

Deccan Herald logoDeccan HeraldIndependentCenter11 hr. ago
Sanjay Raut has to explain his conduct: Supreme Court while hearing plea over SIR

The Supreme Court of India has issued a notice to the Election Commission and its chief, Gyanesh Kumar, regarding a plea filed by Shiv Sena-UBT leader Sanjay Raut and 12 other opposition figures, including Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, concerning alleged irregularities in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. The court has asked Raut to explain his conduct, as he is one of the co-petitioners in the case. The bench, led by Chief Justice Surya Kant, stated that it would entertain the plea provisionally but emphasized that Raut must clarify his actions. During the hearing, the Chief Justice criticized allegations that opposition leaders were attempting to intimidate the judiciary, stating that the court is aware of both public statements and courtroom arguments. The plea seeks the formation of an independent committee to audit changes made during the SIR process.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the Supreme Court's response to a legal challenge involving multiple political figures and the Election Commission. It includes direct quotes from the court and does not exhibit overtly biased language or selective sourcing. The framing remains neutral, focusing on procedural st

Times of India logoTimes of IndiaIndependentCenter20 hr. ago
SC issues notices to CEC, ECs on INDIA bloc SIR petition

The Supreme Court of India has issued notices to the Chief Election Commissioner and other election commissioners regarding a petition filed by the INDIA bloc, likely concerning electoral processes or governance issues. The petition, referred to as 'SIR,' suggests there may be legal challenges or requests for clarification related to elections. As the matter is before the judiciary, the issue remains under review, and further developments are expected.

Bias read (Center): The headline reports on a judicial action involving the Supreme Court and election authorities, which is inherently political but does not show clear slant through word choice or framing. No explicit ideological leaning is evident from the limited information provided.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories