The article discusses a parliamentary session regarding the investigation into the Black Cube affair, where Miro Cerar, a former prime minister and law professor, criticized the lack of adherence to constitutional procedures. He accused the ruling coalition of undermining the constitution by blocking the session. The article highlights past instances where similar issues arose under previous governments, such as the investigation into Robert Golob, but claims there was little public reaction at the time. Critics, including SDS members like Jelka Godec and Andrej Poglajen, accuse Cerar of selective outrage, pointing out his silence during earlier controversies involving energy issues and European elections. They argue that his criticism now is politically motivated and inconsistent with his past actions.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Miro Cerar’s recent criticism as hypocritical and politically motivated, suggesting he selectively condemns current events while ignoring past instances where similar issues occurred without public outcry. This implies a left-leaning perspective that criticizes political opportun즘





