ON
← Back to feed
Censorship / New owners canceled the TV show
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsCenter

Censorship / New owners canceled the TV show

The satirical TV show '24 Minuta sa Zoranom Kesićem' was removed from Serbian television channel Nova S after its new owners, Alpac Capital and Summer Parent under United Group, claimed high production costs were the reason. The show, known for its critical stance towards Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić, had been a popular fixture on the channel. Its creators argue that the decision was politically motivated, linked to approaching parliamentary elections in Serbia. Despite the cancellation, the show will continue on YouTube with over 600,000 subscribers. The change in ownership includes restructuring leadership across several media outlets in Serbia and neighboring countries.

The Serbian television channel Nova S has removed the broadcast of its satirical show 24 minuta sa Zoranom Kesićem, known for its critical stance toward President Aleksandar Vučić. The decision comes amid recent changes in ownership of the network, which was sold to international investment group Alpac Capital and company Summer Parent, a subsidiary of United Group. The show’s creators claim political motivations underlie the move, though the new management cited high production costs as the official reason. The show, hosted by Zoran Kesić, had long been a platform for commentary on political issues, often targeting government policies and figures, including Vučić. Its removal follows broader restructuring efforts at the media outlet, which included leadership changes at several platforms within the Adria News Network (ANN). These changes began with shifts in management at Serbian channels N1 and Nova, as well as online portals Radar and Dnevnik, which operate independently of the president’s direct control. Subsequent adjustments occurred in Slovenia, Croatia, and Bosnia and Herzegovina. According to statements released by ANN, the primary justification for ending the show was financial. The network stated that the program was one of the most expensive elements of their schedule, with annual costs exceeding half a million euros for less than 30 hours of content per year. In a public statement, they noted that the commercial impact of the show was minimal compared to its operational cost, leading them to decide not to renew the contract. However, the show’s team disputes this explanation, asserting that the decision is politically motivated. They believe the timing aligns with the approaching parliamentary elections in Serbia, which Prime Minister Vučić has repeatedly called for since November 2024. The team claims the show would have continued to challenge the ruling party during the campaign period, making it a potential obstacle to the establishment’s interests. Despite the cancellation, the show will continue on its official YouTube channel, where it already has over 600,000 subscribers. The launch of the new season on Nova S was originally scheduled for September 19, but the team plans to start broadcasting the show independently on the same day through their own platform.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

RTV Slovenija (MMC) logoRTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 70
With the change of leadership of TV Nova S, a satirical show that was critical of Vučić was also washed away

The article reports that Serbia's television channel Nova S has discontinued the satirical show '24 minuta sa Zoranom Kesićem,' known for its critical stance towards President Aleksandar Vučić. The show's creators claim the decision was made for political reasons, though the network cites high production costs as the official reason. They believe the show could have been more disruptive during upcoming parliamentary elections. The show will continue on YouTube. The change in ownership of Nova S, part of the broader restructuring of Adria News Network (ANN), includes leadership changes across several countries.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives: the official explanation of financial reasons versus the creators' belief in political motivations. It does not overtly favor one side over the other, maintaining a balanced tone by including quotes from both the network and the show's team. There is no clear,

Why factuality (85): The article reports that SRBian TV station Nova S has removed the airing of the satirical show '24 minuta sa Zoranom Kesićem', known for its critical stance towards President Vučić. It aligns with the cross-source consensus from other articles about the change in ownership of Adria News Network (ANN

Why objectivity (70): The tone suggests a somewhat critical view of the government and the political implications of the show's removal, though not overtly biased. The article presents the official reason (cost-cutting) but also implies political motivations, which may lean slightly toward a particular perspective.

Mladina logoMladinaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 70
Censorship / New owners canceled the TV show

The satirical TV show '24 Minuta sa Zoranom Kesićem' was removed from Serbian television channel Nova S after its new owners, Alpac Capital and Summer Parent under United Group, claimed high production costs were the reason. The show, known for its critical stance towards Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić, had been a popular fixture on the channel. Its creators argue that the decision was politically motivated, linked to approaching parliamentary elections in Serbia. Despite the cancellation, the show will continue on YouTube with over 600,000 subscribers. The change in ownership includes restructuring leadership across several media outlets in Serbia and neighboring countries.

Bias read (Center): While the article discusses a politically sensitive issue involving media control and criticism of a political leader, it presents both perspectives: the official explanation of financial reasons and the creators’ claim of political motivation. The article does not clearly favor one side over the其他,

Why factuality (85): This article corroborates the previous one by stating that the show was removed from SRBian TV and that the creators believe it was due to political reasons. It also mentions the sale of ANN and the cost-cutting rationale provided by the company. These details match the information found in the firs

Why objectivity (70): Similar to the first article, this piece appears to have a subtle bias towards highlighting the political implications of the show's removal. While it provides both the official reason (cost) and the creators' belief (political), the emphasis on the political angle may influence the reader's percept

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories