ON
← Back to feed
Gay couple denounce discrimination at Decameron hotel in San Andrés: 'You are a minority, go away!', a guest shouted at them during a contest
CO🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive6 hr. ago

Gay couple denounce discrimination at Decameron hotel in San Andrés: 'You are a minority, go away!', a guest shouted at them during a contest

Una pareja gay, Diego Martínez y Juan Torres, denunció que durante un concurso organizado en el hotel Decameron de San Andrés, un presentador les negó la participación en el escenario debido a su orientación sexual. La pareja afirma que una mujer presente en el evento gritó: 'Son minoría ustedes dos, váyanse', mientras más de 300 personas presenciaban la situación. Los jóvenes sostienen que su integridad y la de su familia fueron puestos en peligro, especialmente dado que había consumo de alcohol en el lugar. A pesar de la agresión, la pareja decidió permanecer en el escenario y reafirmó sus derechos, destacando que Colombia los 'cobija'. Recibieron apoyo de otros huéspedes, incluida una familia chilena que rechazó la situación. El presentador respondió que 'aquí en Colombia las leyes no son iguales', lo cual los denunciantes consideraron absurdo. Finalmente, la discusión terminó cuando comenzó a llover, algo que la pareja interpretó como una señal divina.

A video capturing a heated fight among tourists during a guided ride on a recreational cart in San Andrés has gone viral on social media, sparking public outrage and calls for stricter safety measures. The incident occurred on July 19, 2026, along one of the island’s main roads, where a group of visitors reportedly turned their peaceful tour into a physical confrontation. The footage, recorded by someone riding a motorcycle alongside the group, shows two pairs of women pulling each other's hair while two men exchange punches. Other bystanders attempt to intervene, shouting warnings such as “Ey, suave, Vale” to calm the situation. The video captures moments of intense tension, with pushing, shouting, and physical altercations forcing some witnesses to step in to separate the participants. However, no immediate police presence is visible in the recording, and there is no indication of injuries or formal sanctions following the incident. According to local authorities, the Police Department of San Andrés stated they were unaware of the reasons behind the altercation and confirmed that no official intervention was requested. “That video lasted only the time they recorded and a little more,” a spokesperson said. “We don’t know who the individuals were or how the situation ended.” This lack of clarity has left many questions unanswered regarding the identities of the participants and the exact nature of the dispute. Testimonies suggest that the conflict may have originated from disagreements over who would operate the vehicle during the tour. What began as a verbal argument escalated into a physical fight involving several members of the group. In addition, the video includes a voice stating, “They’re all drunk,” implying that alcohol consumption might have played a role in the behavior of the individuals involved. The viral spread of the video has prompted widespread reactions online, with users criticizing the actions of the tourists and emphasizing the need for respect and civility in crowded tourist areas. Some have called for greater awareness campaigns targeting visitors, highlighting the importance of responsible conduct when using rented recreational vehicles. Others have pointed to the broader issue of safety protocols in popular tourist spots, especially where shared activities can lead to unexpected conflicts. This incident has reignited discussions about the necessity of enforcing stricter guidelines for rental vehicles used in tourism. While such tours are a common attraction for visitors to San Andrés, officials often remind participants to exercise caution and maintain appropriate behavior to prevent incidents that could endanger both travelers and others. The episode underscores the challenges faced in managing large groups of tourists in confined spaces, particularly when tensions arise unexpectedly. As the situation continues to unfold, local authorities remain focused on addressing concerns related to public safety and visitor conduct. The absence of formal reports or follow-up actions suggests that the matter may not yet require further investigation. Nonetheless, the incident serves as a reminder of the potential risks associated with unregulated group activities in high-traffic tourist zones. For now, the focus remains on the footage itself, which continues to circulate widely and provoke debate.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

3 reports

Semana logoSemanaIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 682 days ago
Centro Comercial Andino ruled on discrimination case and announced first decision: Does not reflect the principles

A shopping mall in northern Bogotá, Centro Comercial Andino, addressed allegations of discrimination after a security guard allegedly told a same-sex couple they could not display affection inside the premises. The incident was captured on video and shared online, showing the guard approaching the couple after they kissed. The couple explained they were filming a video when the encounter occurred. The mall issued a statement condemning the behavior, emphasizing that all individuals are welcome at their facilities and that the couple did not engage in any actions warranting such treatment. The mall apologized to the affected individuals and announced plans to review security protocols and enhance staff training to ensure respectful and inclusive service.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a specific incident involving alleged discrimination at a commercial establishment and the mall’s response. It presents the event neutrally, quoting both the victims and the mall’s official statement. There is no evident ideological framing or biased language; the focus is on谴

Why factuality (75): The article reports on an incident where a security guard allegedly discriminated against a gay couple at a shopping mall in Bogotá. It includes quotes from the affected individuals and the mall’s response. While there is no primary source document, the information aligns with similar reports and ap

Why objectivity (68): The tone is generally neutral, presenting both sides of the story—what happened and the mall’s response. However, the article uses emotionally charged language such as 'presunta discriminación' (alleged discrimination) and emphasizes the mall’s stance, which may slightly favor the victims’ perspecti

El Tiempo logoEl TiempoIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 654 days ago
Video of the moment when tourists engage in a heated fight during a beach cart tour in San Andrés

A tourist altercation turned violent during a tour on a beach cart in San Andrés, Colombia, was captured on video and went viral on social media. The footage shows two groups of tourists engaging in a physical fight, including hair-pulling and punches, while others tried to intervene. According to witnesses, the conflict arose from disagreements over who would drive the vehicle during the tour. Authorities stated they were unaware of the incident and confirmed no police involvement occurred. Some participants reportedly consumed alcohol before the event, which may have contributed to the escalation. The incident has sparked discussions online about tourist behavior and the need for improved safety measures in popular destinations.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the incident objectively, quoting both eyewitness accounts and official statements from local authorities. It does not take a stance on the broader implications or assign blame, focusing instead on the sequence of events and reactions from the public and authorities. There is no

Why factuality (75): The article reports on a viral video of a tourist fight in San Andrés, citing social media as the source. It describes the incident accurately based on the footage, including details like the cause being disputes over driving time and the involvement of multiple participants. However, it does not pr

Why objectivity (65): The tone remains relatively neutral, though there is some emotional language in describing the confrontation. The article presents the event without overt bias but includes phrases like 'violent' and 'riña' which carry emotional weight. The focus on the conflict and lack of broader context may lean

El Tiempo logoEl TiempoIndependentProgressive6 hr. ago
Gay couple denounce discrimination at Decameron hotel in San Andrés: 'You are a minority, go away!', a guest shouted at them during a contest

Una pareja gay, Diego Martínez y Juan Torres, denunció que durante un concurso organizado en el hotel Decameron de San Andrés, un presentador les negó la participación en el escenario debido a su orientación sexual. La pareja afirma que una mujer presente en el evento gritó: 'Son minoría ustedes dos, váyanse', mientras más de 300 personas presenciaban la situación. Los jóvenes sostienen que su integridad y la de su familia fueron puestos en peligro, especialmente dado que había consumo de alcohol en el lugar. A pesar de la agresión, la pareja decidió permanecer en el escenario y reafirmó sus derechos, destacando que Colombia los 'cobija'. Recibieron apoyo de otros huéspedes, incluida una familia chilena que rechazó la situación. El presentador respondió que 'aquí en Colombia las leyes no son iguales', lo cual los denunciantes consideraron absurdo. Finalmente, la discusión terminó cuando comenzó a llover, algo que la pareja interpretó como una señal divina.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the incident as a clear case of discrimination against a same-sex couple, emphasizing their rights and the hostile reaction from a guest. The narrative highlights the couple's resilience and their belief in Colombian law and divine support, which aligns with progressive values. It

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories