Several brands have pulled their advertising from the Mexican television program Ventaneando, following controversial comments made by host Pedro Sola regarding dogs. The decision comes after Sola expressed distaste for seeing dogs in public spaces and even suggested he had thoughts of poisoning them, remarks that sparked widespread criticism on social media. The affected brands include Panditas, Clorets, Halls, and Trident, all owned by the multinational company Mondelēz International. In a statement shared via Instagram, the company emphasized its commitment to respect and empathy, condemning any form of violence or cruelty toward animals. It clarified that Sola’s statements did not reflect the values of its brands and that the decision to remove advertisements was taken to distance itself from his comments. The controversy began when Sola, during an episode of Ventaneando on TV Azteca, stated that he disliked seeing dogs in shopping centers, supermarkets, and restaurants, where they might relieve themselves. He admitted having impulses to throw poisoned meat at such dogs or even shoot their owners. These remarks were met with immediate backlash, leading Sola to issue an apology the following day through a video message on his phone. However, many viewers felt this apology was insufficient, and the controversy continued to grow. Despite his apology, Sola acknowledged making a mistake and claimed he spoke without thinking, expressing regret over his comments while reaffirming his opposition to animal cruelty. Nevertheless, the damage to his reputation persisted, with more celebrities joining the criticism against him. Among them was Susana Zabaleta, who urged Sola to be cautious of potential homophobes, though she did not directly address his comments on dogs. Actress Cecilia Tijerina took a direct stance against Sola, recalling an incident years ago when he referred to her as "half-crazy." She now demands that Sola seek psychological help, criticizing his apparent hatred for innocent animals that provide love and companionship. Tijerina also indirectly criticized Pati Chapoy, who laughed during Sola's remarks about hating dogs. Her Facebook post received thousands of likes and supportive comments from users who agreed with her stance. In addition to Tijerina, other figures have voiced concerns about Sola’s comments. Pepillo Origel reportedly issued an indirect critique, suggesting that Sola should not become the devil himself over his remarks on animal cruelty. Meanwhile, social media users continue to debate whether Sola’s apology was genuine or merely a strategy to avoid being removed from the show. The controversy has also drawn attention to Ventaneando's history of contentious remarks, with some questioning whether this incident is part of a pattern. As the situation unfolds, further responses from Sola and additional actions from advertisers remain uncertain, but the impact on his career and the ongoing discussions around animal welfare are likely to persist.
3 reports
El UniversalIndependentCenterFactual 97Objective 882 days agoSeveral brands, including Panditas, Clorets, Halls, and Trident—owned by Mondelēz International—have announced they will remove their advertisements from the TV Azteca program 'Ventaneando' following controversial comments made by host Pedro Sola about dogs. The companies issued a statement through Instagram distancing themselves from Sola's remarks, which were perceived as promoting animal cruelty. They emphasized that their brand values do not align with such views and expressed disapproval of any violence or mistreatment toward animals. Despite Sola offering an apology, stating he spoke without thinking and regretted his words, the controversy continues to escalate, leading to commercial repercussions and growing criticism from celebrities.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation objectively, focusing on corporate responses to public figures' controversial statements. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing. The framing remains neutral, emphasizing the actions of the companies and the public outcry
Why these scores (Factual 97 · Objective 88): The article provides clear details about brands withdrawing their ads from Ventaneando due to Pedro Sola’s remarks. Quotes from Mondelēz International are included accurately, and the reporting appears neutral in presenting the companies’ official stance. Some editorializing is present but does not
El UniversalIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 855 days ago Cecilia Tijerina throws herself at Pedro Sola and asks him to go to the psychologist for saying things about dogsMexican actress Cecilia Tijerina criticized TV host Pedro Sola for his recent comments expressing dislike for dogs in public spaces and suggesting they could be poisoned. She recalled a past incident where Sola called her 'half crazy' during an interview and now demands he seek psychological help for his alleged hatred toward animals. Tijerina also indirectly criticized someone else—likely Pati Chapoy—for laughing at Sola’s remarks. The post received significant support online, with many users defending Tijerina and condemning Sola’s views. Tijerina has recently reentered the public eye after revealing claims of mistreatment by the cast of the 1990s telenovela 'Muchachitas,' where she shared billing with Kate del Castillo and others.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a personal dispute between two public figures over controversial remarks about animals. It includes direct quotes from both parties and user reactions, offering balanced perspectives without overtly favoring one side. There is no clear ideological framing or biased language.
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): The article accurately reports Cecilia Tijerina’s response to Pedro Sola’s comments about dogs, citing her Facebook statement and specific quotes. It includes reactions from social media users, though some commentary may reflect personal opinions rather than facts. The tone leans slightly emotional
Animal PolíticoIndependentProgressiveyesterdayThe article reports on a proposed law in Mexico City (CDMX) that would impose up to 15 years in prison for acts of animal cruelty, specifically targeting individuals like Pedro Sola, who has been accused of such actions. The law is being promoted by the Grupo Animal organization, which advocates for stricter animal protection measures. The focus is on holding individuals accountable for mistreatment of animals, with the potential legal consequences serving as a deterrent.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the proposed law as a necessary measure to hold individuals like Pedro Sola accountable for animal cruelty, emphasizing the severity of the punishment. This suggests a progressive stance on animal rights and social justice, aligning with left-leaning values. The emphasis on legal惩
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
MX
