The article discusses the issue of noise pollution in Mexico City (CDMX), highlighting its prevalence in various aspects of daily life such as traffic, commercial establishments, homes, and street performers. The noise comes from vehicles, music in bars and restaurants, household appliances, and street vendors. Jonathan Torres, who works in a store in the Historic Center, notes that the World Cup has increased the noise level due to fans using horns and other loud equipment. Mónica, a shopper in the area, mentions that street artists also contribute significantly to the noise, suggesting authorities should regulate their sound levels. According to the Environmental Prosecutor’s Office (PAOT), there have been approximately 3.3 noise complaints per day, totaling 613 between January and July of this year—a number comparable to the same period in 2025. The current legislation regarding noise limits appears outdated, according to the environmental prosecutor, Mónica Viétnica Alegre González.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view of the noise pollution problem in Mexico City, citing multiple perspectives including residents, business owners, and officials. It does not show clear favoritism toward any side but rather reports on the issue and the responses from different stakeholders.
Why factuality (85): The article provides specific examples of noise sources such as vehicles, street vendors, and music from bars and homes. It includes direct quotes from Jonathan Torres and Mónica, adding credibility. However, it lacks quantitative data or official statistics to support the claim that noise levels ha
Why objectivity (75): The article presents multiple perspectives on noise pollution but uses descriptive language like 'aturdir los oídos' and 'exceso de ruido' which can imply judgment. The mention of the World Cup increasing noise is presented as an observation rather than a definitive statement.





