The article discusses the legal case against former Spanish Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, using metaphors related to ancient astronomy and justice. It critiques the shift toward relying on informants ('delatores') rather than judicial processes, comparing this trend to historical inquisitorial methods. The piece argues that the current legal approach prioritizes confessions over objective evidence, effectively transforming defendants into agents of justice. This change is linked to recent rulings by Spain’s Supreme Court, which emphasize the value of confessions in corruption cases. The author warns that this system undermines due process and rewards denunciation over truth.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the reliance on informants as a dangerous shift toward inquisitorial practices, aligning with leftist critiques of judicial overreach and systemic corruption. It portrays the current legal strategy as undermining due process and promoting a punitive system that rewards denunciant.


