Vivanco case adds a new flank: payments of $27 million to Migueles and controversy over his statement

BioBioChileIndependentCenter19 hr. ago

New developments have emerged in the investigation involving former Supreme Court Minister Ángela Vivanco and her partner, Gonzalo Migueles, following revelations of payments totaling $27 million made by two real estate companies involved in cases related to their projects at the Supreme Court. According to an investigation by Reportea, $15 million came from Inmobiliaria Argenta and $12 million from Inmobiliaria Alta Vista Pucón. These transfers occurred while Vivanco was part of the Third Chamber of the Supreme Court, which handled cases linked to these firms. While the timing of the payments aligns with the processing of these cases, they do not alone prove illegal consideration. The controversy has also arisen over Migueles' declaration to the prosecution, which his defense claims was leaked prematurely before they could review it, potentially violating procedural secrecy laws. The defense of Ángela Vivanco has filed a motion questioning the premature disclosure, citing legal concerns. Meanwhile, Migueles recently transitioned from preventive detention to house arrest, and his new testimony raises questions about potential judicial benefits.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the allegations against Vivanco and Migueles, as well as the defenses raised by their legal representatives. It does not exhibit overtly biased language or selective sourcing but rather reports on conflicting claims and legal arguments without clear endorsement of either.

CIPER ChileIndependentProgressive3 days ago

The article reports that Miguel Migueles has accused former judge Vivanco of being aware in 2023 that an attorney representing a Belarusian consortium would pay for a favorable court ruling. This revelation suggests potential corruption or undue influence in judicial proceedings involving the Belarusian firm. The claim implies that Vivanco had knowledge of financial arrangements aimed at securing a specific legal outcome. Such allegations could raise questions about the integrity of the judicial process and the involvement of foreign entities in domestic legal matters.

Bias read (Progressive): The article highlights accusations of judicial misconduct and potential foreign influence, which are typically covered with a critical lens by left-leaning outlets. The framing emphasizes corruption and the need for accountability, aligning with progressive values.