ON
← Back to feed
Cash settlements on home insurance claims leaving vulnerable Australians short-changed, Asic says
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsCenter9 hr. ago

Cash settlements on home insurance claims leaving vulnerable Australians short-changed, Asic says

Australian regulators have raised concerns over the practice of home insurers offering cash settlements for cyclone-damaged properties, which often leaves homeowners facing higher repair costs. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) found that many insurers rely on a single quote from preferred contractors, leading to underpayment and forcing homeowners to cover additional expenses. In some cases, the quoted prices were significantly lower than what contractors would charge directly to customers, creating unfair outcomes. ASIC highlighted that nearly 63% of claims were settled through cash payments, with major insurers like IAG and Allianz using this method in over 80% of cases. The report criticized the lack of transparency and support for vulnerable customers, although no legal violations were identified.

Home insurers in Australia are predominantly opting for cash settlements when processing claims, potentially leaving vulnerable homeowners underprepared for the full cost of repairing cyclone-damaged properties, according to a report by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (Asic). The findings highlight concerns over the fairness of current practices, particularly for individuals who may struggle to manage unexpected expenses. The report, released on Monday, examined a sample of home building insurance claims following Cyclone Jasper, which struck far north Queensland in December 2023. Asic focused on major players in the home insurance sector, including Insurance Australia Group (IAG), AAI, QBE Insurance, Allianz Australia, and Sure Insurance. It discovered that over 63% of final claims were resolved through cash payments rather than full rebuilds or managed repairs. Among these insurers, IAG and Allianz used cash settlements in more than 80% of cases. Asic commissioner Alan Kirkland emphasized that while insurers claim to favor managed repairs, the data suggests otherwise. He warned that the reliance on cash settlements often results in homeowners facing additional financial burdens. In some instances, insurers accepted quotes from their preferred builders, which included substantial discounts. These lower figures were then passed directly to homeowners, leading to situations where the quoted price proved insufficient for necessary repairs. One example cited in the report involved an insurer's preferred builder offering a quote at a 40% discount. While the insurer paid out the reduced amount, the builder later declined to perform the work for that sum. This discrepancy highlights the potential mismatch between the cash offer and the actual repair costs. Additionally, the report noted that although some insurers attempted to adjust for the discount, there was no consistent system in place to ensure fair compensation for homeowners. Consumers were often not adequately informed about the implications of choosing cash settlements. Only three of the five insurers explicitly informed policyholders of their right to reconsider their decision after accepting a cash offer, though two later began providing clearer guidance. Furthermore, four of the five insurers lacked robust processes for identifying and supporting vulnerable customers, raising questions about how effectively they address the needs of those most affected by such decisions. The rising costs of construction and repairs have significantly impacted home insurance premiums, with Finity reporting a 51% increase in home insurance costs over five years ending in October 2025. The Australian Bureau of Statistics noted that insurance prices rose 4.2% in the year to July, surpassing general inflation. Asic previously urged car owners to challenge their insurers and seek better deals, citing similar issues with premium justification. Complaints regarding home building insurance have surged back to levels last seen in 2022-23, attributed largely to delays in claim processing. The Insurance Council of Australia has linked the increased frequency of extreme weather events to a near tripling of total costs for insurers. A 2025 report estimated that extreme weather alone generated $4.5 billion in claims annually.

1 reports

The Guardian (World) logoThe Guardian (World)IndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 789 hr. ago
Cash settlements on home insurance claims leaving vulnerable Australians short-changed, Asic says

Australian regulators have raised concerns over the practice of home insurers offering cash settlements for cyclone-damaged properties, which often leaves homeowners facing higher repair costs. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) found that many insurers rely on a single quote from preferred contractors, leading to underpayment and forcing homeowners to cover additional expenses. In some cases, the quoted prices were significantly lower than what contractors would charge directly to customers, creating unfair outcomes. ASIC highlighted that nearly 63% of claims were settled through cash payments, with major insurers like IAG and Allianz using this method in over 80% of cases. The report criticized the lack of transparency and support for vulnerable customers, although no legal violations were identified.

Bias read (Center): The article presents findings from a regulatory body (ASIC) regarding practices in the insurance sector that affect vulnerable populations. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. The focus is on exposing potential systemic issues rather than taking a

Why factuality (85): The article reports on a report by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) regarding cash settlements in home insurance claims following Cyclone Jasper. It cites specific percentages and insurer names, aligning with the cross-source consensus that cash settlements are common and

Why objectivity (78): The article presents the issue from the perspective of ASIC and highlights concerns about unfair outcomes for vulnerable homeowners. While it provides factual information, it uses emotionally charged language such as 'short-changed' and 'unfair outcomes,' which may lean toward a critical view of ins

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories