ON
← Back to feed
Carroll scraps plan for statue of Daniel Andrews
Australia🏛️ PoliticsCenter8/31/2026

Carroll scraps plan for statue of Daniel Andrews

On August 29, 2026, Victoria's new Premier Ben Carroll announced the cancellation of a $134,000 statue of former Premier Daniel Andrews, citing that the statue policy did not meet taxpayer expectations. The policy, initiated in 1999 by then-premier Jeff Kennett, allowed long-serving premiers to receive statues near Parliament House. Carroll stated that while the contract for the Andrews statue would not be canceled, an independent panel would determine an alternative subject for a statue. The decision follows broader changes including reduced spending on state funerals. Carroll emphasized that public funds should be used 'carefully and deliberately,' arguing that automatic statue grants were inappropriate. He acknowledged gratitude for former premiers' service but maintained that taxpayer-funded memorials were unnecessary.

Planned statue of ex-Victorian premier Daniel Andrews scrapped Victoria’s new premier, Ben Carroll, has ordered the cancellation of a planned $134,000 bronze statue of his predecessor, Daniel Andrews, following a review of how the state commemorates past leaders. The decision comes after Carroll appointed an independent, bipartisan panel to reassess the criteria for erecting statues of former premiers and to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of such memorials. The panel will also consider alternatives for the existing commissioned artwork, ensuring no financial burden falls on taxpayers. The initiative to create statues of long-serving premiers began under Jeff Kennett during his tenure as premier in the late 1990s. At that time, the policy was established to recognize individuals who had spent more than 3,000 days in office, a threshold equivalent to nearly eight years of continuous service. This led to the installation of four statues in Treasury Place, Melbourne, honoring Albert Dunstan, Henry Bolte, Rupert Hamer, and John Cain Jr. Each of these figures met the 3,000-day requirement and was immortalized in bronze. Daniel Andrews, who served as premier from 2014 to 2023, reached the 3,000-day mark in 2020. His statue was commissioned by the previous government, led by Jacinta Allan, in March 2023. However, the current administration has decided not to proceed with its creation, citing concerns over public expenditure. While the contract for the statue will remain intact to avoid additional costs, the project itself has been halted pending the findings of the newly formed panel. Ben Carroll, who assumed leadership of the state Labor party in July and took office as premier last month, emphasized the need for fiscal responsibility in government spending. In a formal statement, he stated that while the government respects the contributions of past leaders, taxpayer funds should be allocated carefully. He noted that state funerals, though meaningful, should remain rare due to their emotional weight and cost. The decision has sparked discussion among political figures and historians regarding the legacy of past premiers. Jeff Kennett, who initiated the statue program, clarified earlier this month that the policy was not legally binding but rather a guideline. Meanwhile, Melbourne’s mayor, Nick Reece, has previously advocated for a statue to honor Joan Kirner, the first woman to hold the position of premier, despite her shorter tenure. Kirner served from 1990 to 1992 before being succeeded by John Cain. Despite the controversy surrounding the cancellation of the Andrews statue, the new panel tasked with reviewing commemorative practices will also assess the frequency and cost of state funerals. This move reflects a broader effort to align memorial traditions with contemporary fiscal priorities. The panel will include representatives from diverse backgrounds to ensure a balanced perspective on how the state honors its political history. The independent review process is expected to take several months, during which the panel will gather input from stakeholders, including members of the public, historians, and former officials. Their final recommendations will determine whether the Andrews statue proceeds in a modified form or if it is replaced entirely by another figure. The outcome could set a precedent for future decisions on how Victoria chooses to remember its political leaders. Daniel Andrews has not yet commented on the decision, though he previously expressed indifference toward having a statue erected in his honor. During his 3,000-day milestone in 2023, he remarked that the threshold was a concept introduced by Kennett and held no particular significance for him personally. Instead, he focused on continuing his government’s agenda without seeking symbolic recognition. As the panel begins its work, the focus shifts to evaluating the broader implications of how Victoria chooses to commemorate its political past. The review will likely influence future policies on state memorials and the balance between honoring tradition and managing public resources responsibly.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 3 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

4 reports

The Age logoThe AgeIndependentCenterFactual 97Objective 888/28/2026
Carroll scraps plan for statue of Daniel Andrews

On August 29, 2026, Victoria's new Premier Ben Carroll announced the cancellation of a $134,000 statue of former Premier Daniel Andrews, citing that the statue policy did not meet taxpayer expectations. The policy, initiated in 1999 by then-premier Jeff Kennett, allowed long-serving premiers to receive statues near Parliament House. Carroll stated that while the contract for the Andrews statue would not be canceled, an independent panel would determine an alternative subject for a statue. The decision follows broader changes including reduced spending on state funerals. Carroll emphasized that public funds should be used 'carefully and deliberately,' arguing that automatic statue grants were inappropriate. He acknowledged gratitude for former premiers' service but maintained that taxpayer-funded memorials were unnecessary.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the decision as a policy reversal based on fiscal responsibility rather than ideological stance. While the removal of the statue could be seen as politically motivated, the focus is on budgetary considerations and public accountability. The framing remains balanced, quoting both

Why factuality (97): This article provides precise details about the $134,000 cost, the repeal of the statue policy, and the role of Jeff Kennett in initiating the original guidelines. It correctly identifies the four premiers already honored with statues and accurately reflects Carroll's statements. The information mat

Why objectivity (88): The article presents the situation objectively but uses phrases like 'controversial' and 'immortalised in bronze,' which carry some emotional weight. While it quotes Carroll and provides background, it leans slightly toward framing the decision as a response to public sentiment rather than a purely

The Sydney Morning Herald logoThe Sydney Morning HeraldIndependentCenterFactual 96Objective 878/28/2026
Carroll scraps plan for statue of Daniel Andrews

Victoria's new premier, Ben Carroll, has canceled plans for a $134,000 statue of former Premier Daniel Andrews, citing concerns about public funding and taxpayer expectations. The policy, originally introduced in 1999 under Jeff Kennett, allowed long-serving premiers to be commemorated with statues near Parliament House. Carroll stated that automatic allocation of statues to long-serving leaders does not align with responsible use of public funds. Instead, an independent panel will now determine an alternative subject for a statue and provide guidance on the frequency and cost of state funerals. This decision reflects a shift toward more deliberate management of public resources.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the decision to cancel the statue of Daniel Andrews in a balanced manner, highlighting both the reasoning behind the cancellation and the proposed changes. It quotes Carroll directly but does not exhibit overtly biased language or selective sourcing. The framing remains neutral,

Why factuality (96): The article accurately conveys the cancellation of the statue, the $134,000 cost, and the formation of an independent panel. It correctly attributes the original policy to Jeff Kennett and names the four premiers already honored. The content aligns with the cross-source consensus, though it omits mi

Why objectivity (87): The article remains largely neutral but repeats the term 'controversial' and uses similar phrasing to the first article, which may contribute to a shared framing of the issue as divisive. It avoids strong opinion but still frames the decision through the lens of public accountability and taxpayer co

ABC News (Australia) logoABC News (Australia)State / PublicCenterFactual 95Objective 908/28/2026
Planned statue of ex-Victorian premier Daniel Andrews scrapped

A planned bronze statue of former Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews has been canceled, with his successor Ben Carroll establishing an independent panel to reassess how the state honors past leaders. The decision follows longstanding debates over the cost and necessity of such memorials, particularly after Andrews surpassed 3,000 days in office. The statue was initially commissioned by the previous government, but opposition figures had previously threatened to cancel it if they gained power. While the specific statue of Andrews will not be funded, the panel will explore alternative commemorative projects. This move reflects broader discussions about the value of taxpayer-funded monuments and the criteria for honoring public servants.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the political controversy surrounding the statue, including perspectives from both the current government and opposition figures. It avoids overtly favoring one side while highlighting the debate over public spending and historical recognition. The framing,

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports that the planned statue of Daniel Andrews was scrapped, citing Ben Carroll's decision to form an independent panel. It provides context about the history of the statues initiated under the Kennett government and mentions the $134,000 cost and the involvement of the pre

Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a neutral tone overall, presenting the decision without overt bias. It quotes Carroll directly and acknowledges opposition concerns without taking sides. However, it slightly emphasizes the 'political debate' around the statue, which may subtly frame the issue as contentious ra

The Age logoThe AgeIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 708/31/2026
In limbo, ‘in pieces’: State of Andrews statue revealed as Carroll confesses $60,000 spent

Premier Ben Carroll has canceled the planned statue of former premier Daniel Andrews, revealing that $60,000 had already been spent on the project, which was originally commissioned by Jacinta Allan. The decision comes amid criticism of the initiative, with Carroll blaming former premier Jeff Kennett for the 'stuff-up' and stating that taxpayer-funded statues of past leaders failed the 'pub test.' The partially completed statue is currently stored in pieces at a Fitzroy foundry, and it remains unclear whether the design work includes a complete figure or just partial components. While the project is being scrapped, the contract will remain active, and an independent panel will determine an alternative subject for the sculpture. Meanwhile, comedian Anthony Lehmann attended two separate charity events on the same evening.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the cancellation of the statue and associated costs without overtly favoring any political side. It quotes Premier Ben Carroll and criticizes the policy as a Liberal Party initiative, but does not take a clear stance on the merits of the policy itself. The tone remains neutral,

Why factuality (85): The article provides specific details such as the $60,000 already spent, the total contract value of $134,000, and mentions Premier Ben Carroll’s comments about Jeff Kennett’s policy. These align with what would be expected from a cross-source consensus if multiple reports covered similar details. H

Why objectivity (70): The article uses phrases like 'cancelled plan', 'divisive project', and 'unloved proposed work of art' which introduce a degree of subjective judgment. While it quotes Carroll directly, the framing suggests a critical stance toward the project without presenting counterpoints or alternative perspect

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories