ON
← Back to feed
Carr: FCC ‘looking at a lot of actions’ to stop broadcasters' partisan coverage
United States🏛️ PoliticsConservativeOverlooked by progressives9/6/2026

Carr: FCC ‘looking at a lot of actions’ to stop broadcasters' partisan coverage

Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chair Brendan Carr stated that the agency is considering various actions to prevent broadcasters from airing fake polls and partisan content ahead of the midterm elections. Carr emphasized that networks should serve the public interest rather than a narrow partisan agenda. His remarks followed President Donald Trump's criticism of NBC News anchor Kristen Welker, who noted Trump's mixed performance in Republican primaries. Trump accused Welker of spreading 'purposeful inaccuracy' and threatened to report her to the FCC. NBC defended Welker, calling her 'one of the best in the business.' Trump has repeatedly pressured the FCC, which is typically an independent body, to influence broadcasters. Carr has also investigated diversity and inclusion hiring practices at NBC and ABC, and praised CBS under new leadership aligned with Trump allies. Critics argue that Trump is using the FCC to intimidate journalists, while some Republicans caution against penalizing broadcasters, citing past controversies like the suspension of Jimmy Kimmel.

Brendan Carr, chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), said Sunday he is considering multiple steps to curb networks from broadcasting misleading information ahead of the midterm elections. During an appearance on Fox News's The Sunday Briefing, Carr stated that media outlets should serve the public interest, not a narrow political agenda. He mentioned that the FCC might issue guidance to prevent broadcasters from airing fabricated polls aimed at influencing voter behavior. Carr noted that President Donald Trump has criticized NBC News anchor Kristen Welker for highlighting his poor performance in recent Republican primary races. Trump, who has a 96% win rate in this year's primaries, reportedly demanded that the FCC investigate Welker for alleged inaccuracies. NBC News defended Welker, describing her as one of the best in the industry. The FCC has faced scrutiny for its role in regulating media, especially under Trump's administration. Carr has previously investigated diversity and inclusion policies at major networks like NBC and ABC. He has also praised CBS News, which is owned by a company led by Trump ally David Ellison. Critics argue that Trump's frequent calls for FCC intervention could be used to pressure journalists. Some Republicans, including Senator Ted Cruz, have expressed concerns about potential regulatory actions against broadcasters, citing past instances such as the suspension of late-night host Jimmy Kimmel following a controversial incident involving a conservative activist.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

The Hill logoThe HillIndependentConservativeFactual 60Objective 409/6/2026
Carr: FCC ‘looking at a lot of actions’ to stop broadcasters' partisan coverage

Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chair Brendan Carr stated that the agency is considering various actions to prevent broadcasters from airing fake polls and partisan content ahead of the midterm elections. Carr emphasized that networks should serve the public interest rather than a narrow partisan agenda. His remarks followed President Donald Trump's criticism of NBC News anchor Kristen Welker, who noted Trump's mixed performance in Republican primaries. Trump accused Welker of spreading 'purposeful inaccuracy' and threatened to report her to the FCC. NBC defended Welker, calling her 'one of the best in the business.' Trump has repeatedly pressured the FCC, which is typically an independent body, to influence broadcasters. Carr has also investigated diversity and inclusion hiring practices at NBC and ABC, and praised CBS under new leadership aligned with Trump allies. Critics argue that Trump is using the FCC to intimidate journalists, while some Republicans caution against penalizing broadcasters, citing past controversies like the suspension of Jimmy Kimmel.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the FCC's potential actions as a response to 'fake polls' and 'partisan coverage,' aligning with conservative concerns about media bias. It highlights Trump's direct involvement and criticism of a journalist who challenged his narrative, suggesting a right-leaning perspective on媒体

Why factuality (60): The article discusses FCC Chair Brendan Carr's comments about preventing partisan coverage and fake polls, which is unrelated to the primary source document about the Senate market. The primary source focuses on Senate control determination rules and prediction market data, while this article covers

Why objectivity (40): The article exhibits clear bias through direct quotes from President Trump and selective framing of the issue. It presents Trump's perspective as valid without counterbalance, using phrases like 'President Trump is over the target' and 'purposeful inaccuracy.' The tone is overtly partisan, favoring

The Washington Times logoThe Washington TimesParty-alignedConservativeFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 309/6/2026
Federal Communications Commission plans to warn broadcasters against airing 'fake polls'

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) chairman, Brendan Carr, stated that President Trump is correct in questioning 'partisan' television networks. This remark suggests a potential regulatory action by the FCC to caution broadcasters against disseminating 'fake polls,' which could be interpreted as an effort to curb politically motivated misinformation during election periods.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the FCC's potential actions as aligned with President Trump's skepticism toward partisan media, implying a conservative stance against perceived liberal bias in news outlets. The emphasis on 'partisan' networks and the suggestion that they spread 'fake polls' reflects a rightward傾

Why factuality: no official source document/info detected

Why objectivity (30): The article shows strong political bias by directly quoting President Trump and implying his concerns are valid without providing opposing viewpoints. It uses loaded language like 'partisan' networks without defining or contextualizing the term. The framing suggests approval of Trump's stance withou

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories