The Commission has already taken a number of measures to improve the situation in the Community, such as the introduction of a new system of excise duties for motor vehicles.
The article reports on the rapid reversal of a recent tax cut on diesel fuel in Italy, which was introduced to offset rising prices ahead of summer holidays. The price of diesel increased again within three days, with the average price on ordinary roads rising from €2.066 to €2.080 per liter, and motorway prices increasing from €2.165 to €2.175 per liter. This swift increase occurred despite the temporary reduction in excise duties, which was intended to provide relief to drivers. The measure, funded by a €125 million allocation over ten days, has already lost effectiveness before fully reaching consumers, as international oil prices rose due to tensions in the Middle East. The Ministry of Enterprises and Made in Italy’s Price Observatory notes that the benefit of the tax cut has significantly diminished, with the discount now reduced to around 10.5 cents per liter on ordinary roads and 8 cents on motorways. Consumers report additional costs, with an extra €0.50 for a 50-liter tank on motorways and €0.70 on ordinary roads compared to the previous day. Regional disparities exist, with areas like Valle d’Aosta experiencing more significant increases, while Sicily remains stable. The
Go to the primary sources (2)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
The price of self-service diesel has risen to 2.10 euros per liter across Italy's national road network, marking the highest level since July 29. This increase follows the recent reduction in fuel taxes implemented by the government, which lowered the diesel tax rate by 17 cents between July 28 and August 6. The average price for self-service gasoline remains stable at 1.999 euros per liter. On highways, the average price for self-service gasoline is 2.084 euros per liter, while diesel averages 2.173 euros per liter. These figures come from the Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport's Fuel Price Observatory.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data on fuel prices without overtly favoring any political stance. It references government actions (tax cuts) but does not editorialize or frame the information in a biased manner. The tone is neutral, focusing on statistical updates rather than commentary.
Why factuality (90): The article provides up-to-date pricing data for gasoline and diesel, referencing the MIMIT observatory. It accurately reflects the current state of fuel prices and aligns with the primary source document’s context.
Why objectivity (88): The article is factual and neutral, presenting data without editorializing. It focuses on the latest price updates and regional variations without taking sides on policy decisions.
Il Sole 24 OreParty-aligned🔒CenterFactual 90Objective 85yesterday
The article reports on the average price of gasoline and diesel in Italy as of August 4, 2026. The average street price for gasoline was 1.998 euros per liter, while the average highway price was 2.084 euros per liter, both stable compared to the previous day. The highest average daily street price was recorded in Bolzano province, followed by Nuoro and Trieste, whereas the lowest was in Sondrio, followed by Biella and Asti. Nationally, the weekly average price reported by the Ministry of Environment and Energy Security was 1.961 euros, showing an increase compared to the previous week. The historical peak for gasoline prices occurred during the week of March 14, 2022, reaching an average of 2.184 euros per liter, before declining due to temporary reductions in excise taxes implemented by the government in March 2022, which were later suspended at the start of 2023.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data on fuel prices without overtly favoring any political stance. It includes historical context regarding government actions (such as the reduction of excise taxes) but does so neutrally, focusing on statistical information rather than commentary or advocacy.
Why factuality (90): The article discusses the effectiveness of the recent tax cut on diesel and provides detailed price changes over time. It references official data sources and aligns with the primary source document’s context.
Why objectivity (85): The tone is informative and objective, discussing the impact of the tax cut and the ongoing price trends without expressing personal opinions or biases.
The article discusses the rising prices of gasoline and diesel in Italy during the summer travel season, noting that the average price for self-service diesel reached 2.096 euros per liter. The Ministry of Enterprises and Made in Italy provided these figures based on data from their observatory. The article highlights the frustration among drivers who feel the discounts they expected have disappeared, and it includes an interactive map to help users find the cheapest fuel stations. The piece also promotes subscription packages to the newspaper, offering various benefits such as ad-free browsing, exclusive content access, and discounts on related services.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on fuel prices, which are a matter of public concern and economic policy, but presents factual information without overtly favoring any political stance. It does not include strong ideological language or one-sided sourcing, maintaining a balanced tone.
Why factuality (90): The article details the government's considerations around extending the diesel tax cut and discusses potential funding sources like mobile excises and the suggestion by Salvini. This aligns with the primary source document's focus on fiscal policy and government decisions. It includes specific figu
Why objectivity (85): While the article presents the situation objectively, there is a subtle emphasis on political suggestions (like Salvini's comments), which may introduce a slight ideological tilt.
Il Sole 24 OreParty-aligned🔒CenterFactual 90Objective 854 days ago
The average price of gasoline in Italy has reached nearly 2 euros per liter, with peaks in Bolzano, Valle d'Aosta, and Friuli. Diesel prices have also risen significantly but saw a slight decrease after the government reduced taxes by 17 cents per liter. The government is closely monitoring fuel prices ahead of an upcoming cabinet meeting, as they approach thresholds deemed critical by authorities. International oil prices, measured by the Brent crude index, have stabilized at around $87 per barrel, but domestic fuel prices continue to rise.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data on rising fuel prices and mentions government actions such as tax cuts on diesel. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing. The tone remains neutral, focusing on reported figures and official measures taken by the Italian政府.
Why factuality (90): This article provides specific price data for gasoline and diesel, matching the primary source document. It accurately reflects the recent trends and government actions related to fuel prices, including the reduction in diesel taxes. It also references the Brent oil price, which is relevant to the o
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting both rising prices and government interventions without taking sides. It focuses on factual reporting rather than opinionated commentary.
The Italian government introduced a temporary tax cut on diesel fuel aimed at alleviating rising fuel prices during summer holidays. The measure, which reduces excise duties by 17 cents per liter (effective July 28–August 6), has had minimal impact so far, with average diesel prices dropping by just 0.5 cents per liter. Consumers and transporters criticize the limited effect, while the government acknowledges the measure as timely but not sufficient. The tax reduction is funded through a combination of extra VAT revenue and sanctions against companies. Some oil companies, like Eni, have fully implemented the price cuts, but others have delayed updates, causing confusion among retailers. Prices remain largely unchanged at pumps, with gasoline still increasing slightly.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view of the government’s intervention, noting both its limitations and the government’s acknowledgment of those limits. It reports on criticism from consumers and industry groups without overtly endorsing any particular political stance. The framing remains neutral,客观
Why factuality (90): This article provides comprehensive details on the limited effect of the diesel tax cut, including specific figures and the government's response. It aligns closely with the primary source document and includes additional context such as the use of funds from sanctions and the economic fund.
Why objectivity (85): The article is largely factual, though it briefly mentions public criticism, which could be interpreted as a minor editorial angle.
ANSAIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 858 days ago
The Italian government is preparing to introduce emergency measures to address rising fuel prices, with a decree expected to be approved during today's Council of Ministers meeting. The focus is primarily on reducing the cost of diesel, with plans for a second intervention based on July VAT data. Additionally, the decree includes measures related to the extraordinary administration of Ilva. Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and her deputies Matteo Salvini and Antonio Tajani are present at Palazzo Chigi. There is ongoing debate within the government about whether to increase tobacco taxes to fund these measures, with Salvini explicitly opposing this idea. Fuel prices remain high, with gasoline nearing levels seen in October 2023 and diesel approaching historical highs from March 2022.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the government's planned interventions without overtly favoring any particular political faction. It reports on internal debates within the government, including Salvini's opposition to using tobacco taxes, but does not take a clear ideological stance. The framing remains fact-f
Why factuality (90): The article quotes Gianni Murano from Unem, providing expert analysis on the government's measure. It accurately reflects the context and implications discussed in the primary source document, including the rationale behind the temporary measure.
Why objectivity (85): While informative, the article presents the views of an industry representative, which introduces a slight subjective element. However, it maintains a balanced approach by also discussing market factors affecting fuel prices.
The price of fuel continues to rise in Italy, with diesel reaching a historic high. According to data collected by the Mimit’s Fuel Price Observatory, the average price for self-service fuel along national roads was 1,982 euros per liter for gasoline and 2,18 euros per liter for diesel. The article provides an interactive map to help users find the most cost-effective fuel stations.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on rising fuel prices without taking a clear stance or using biased language. It focuses on providing factual information and tools (like an interactive map) to help consumers, without emphasizing any particular political perspective.
Why factuality (90): The article clearly outlines the government's consideration of a targeted diesel tax cut and the timing of the measure. It references the current price levels and the upcoming Council of Ministers meeting, aligning with the primary source document.
Why objectivity (85): The tone is neutral, focusing on the government's actions and the rationale behind them without expressing personal views.
Il Sole 24 OreParty-aligned🔒CenterFactual 90Objective 859 days ago
The Italian government is considering targeted measures to reduce fuel prices by focusing on diesel rather than gasoline. The proposed decree aims to bring down diesel prices, which have reached levels similar to March 2022, below the psychological threshold of €2 per liter. Gasoline remains at €1.982 per liter, slightly above the annual average but still below the critical level, hence not included in the measure. The decision reflects differing trends in price movements between the two fuels over recent weeks. The exact figures remain under review ahead of the Council of Ministers meeting, with potential adjustments based on available resources. This move is part of a broader strategy to manage fuel costs before the anticipated 'red sticker' week in August, following previous spending of around €2 billion to control pump prices.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual economic data and governmental planning without overt ideological slant. It reports on policy considerations and technical assessments without favoring any particular political stance. The framing remains neutral, focusing on economic indicators and government actions, a
Why factuality (90): This article provides detailed price data and explains the government's approach to fuel taxation, including the distinction between gasoline and diesel. It aligns with the primary source document and includes specific figures and context.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains an objective tone, presenting the situation based on available data without introducing subjective commentary.
The price of gasoline continues to rise while diesel remains largely unchanged despite a recent tax cut introduced by the government. According to the latest data from the MIMIT’s Fuel Price Observatory, the average self-service price for gasoline nationwide is 1.986 euros per liter, compared to 1.982 euros the previous day. Diesel prices remain at 2.180 euros per liter, slightly below the previous day's 2.185 euros. On motorway networks, gasoline averages 2.074 euros per liter, up from 2.071 euros, while diesel stands at 2.250 euros per liter, down from 2.255 euros. The article provides an interactive map allowing users to find the most affordable fuel stations in their area or along travel routes, including a calculator to determine how many liters can be purchased with a specific amount of money.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual updates on fuel prices and government policy without overtly favoring any political stance. It reports on the impact of a recent tax reduction without commentary on its effectiveness or political implications. While the topic involves government action, the framing is ap
Why factuality (89): The article offers detailed price data and confirms the minimal impact of the diesel tax cut. It references the Ministry of Enterprises and the Osservatorio del Mimit, aligning with the primary source document. It also includes consumer feedback, adding context.
Why objectivity (85): The tone remains neutral, presenting both the official data and public reaction without taking a clear stance.
The Italian government faces a decision on whether to extend or adjust the recent reduction in fuel taxes, which was introduced to mitigate rising fuel prices during summer travel season. The tax cut, initially effective for a limited period, has already been largely offset by price increases implemented by oil companies. According to the latest data from the Ministry of Enterprises and Made in Italy, the average price of self-service diesel rose to 2.097 euros per liter, reducing the residual benefit of the tax cut to just 8.8 cents per liter. Meanwhile, gasoline prices continue to rise, approaching the 2-euro-per-liter threshold. Despite falling crude oil prices, diesel prices remain high due to refining challenges and supply tensions. Regional disparities persist, with Bolzano recording the highest diesel prices, while the Marche region has the lowest. Consumer advocacy groups argue that current measures are insufficient and urge further government intervention.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information on fuel prices, government decisions, and market dynamics without overtly favoring any political side. It includes quotes from both official sources and consumer advocates but does not exhibit biased language or selective emphasis.
Why factuality (88): The article provides detailed price changes and references the Ministry of Enterprises' observatory. It accurately describes the rapid erosion of the tax cut benefits and aligns with the primary source document’s context.
Why objectivity (85): The article remains neutral, presenting the facts about price increases and the diminishing effect of the tax cut without taking a clear stance on policy outcomes.
Il Sole 24 OreParty-aligned🔒CenterFactual 88Objective 8510 days ago
The article discusses rising fuel prices in Italy, particularly focusing on diesel, which has increased more sharply than gasoline since July. It outlines potential government interventions aimed at curbing price hikes through a decree law, which would use funds from the extra VAT collected in June to provide temporary relief. The proposed measure is seen as a bridge toward future mobile excise adjustments, potentially using the additional VAT collected in July to finance further discounts. The article notes that while gasoline prices have risen by 17.5 cents per liter, diesel has climbed by 30 cents, making it a prime target for targeted intervention. With daily extra costs reaching around €28.4 million, the government is considering measures to address the financial burden on consumers.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation objectively, detailing both the rise in fuel prices and the government’s potential responses without overtly favoring either side. While it highlights the economic impact and the need for intervention, it does not take a clear ideological stance on the solution, as
Why factuality (88): This article provides detailed figures on fuel price increases and mentions the expected intervention. It includes specific numbers like the increase in diesel prices and the potential financial impact. The content is largely aligned with the primary source document.
Why objectivity (85): The article remains neutral in tone, presenting both the current situation and the proposed interventions without overt bias. It focuses on factual reporting rather than opinion.
The article discusses rising fuel prices in Italy, noting that diesel reached 2,092 euros per liter along national highways. The Ministry of Enterprises and Made in Italy reported this based on data from the Mimit Observatory. The piece includes an interactive map to help users find the cheapest fuel stations. However, the majority of the text focuses on promoting subscription packages for the newspaper, detailing various benefits such as unlimited site access, no ads, participation in editorial meetings, and discounts on products and services.
Bias read (Center): The article primarily reports on economic data regarding fuel prices, which is a non-political issue. While there is some mention of government data, the focus is on providing information rather than taking a stance. There is no clear ideological framing or biased language.
Why factuality (87): This article provides specific price data for gasoline and diesel, continuing the trend reported in previous articles. It aligns with the primary source document's context and includes relevant figures, though it is somewhat repetitive.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains an objective tone, providing factual updates without leaning toward any particular viewpoint.
The article reports on the rapid reversal of a recent tax cut on diesel fuel in Italy, which was introduced to offset rising prices ahead of summer holidays. The price of diesel increased again within three days, with the average price on ordinary roads rising from €2.066 to €2.080 per liter, and motorway prices increasing from €2.165 to €2.175 per liter. This swift increase occurred despite the temporary reduction in excise duties, which was intended to provide relief to drivers. The measure, funded by a €125 million allocation over ten days, has already lost effectiveness before fully reaching consumers, as international oil prices rose due to tensions in the Middle East. The Ministry of Enterprises and Made in Italy’s Price Observatory notes that the benefit of the tax cut has significantly diminished, with the discount now reduced to around 10.5 cents per liter on ordinary roads and 8 cents on motorways. Consumers report additional costs, with an extra €0.50 for a 50-liter tank on motorways and €0.70 on ordinary roads compared to the previous day. Regional disparities exist, with areas like Valle d’Aosta experiencing more significant increases, while Sicily remains stable. The
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of the impact of a government policy on fuel prices, focusing on economic data and regional variations. While it critiques the policy's ineffectiveness, it does not take a clear ideological stance or emphasize specific political groups. It provides balanced, if
Why factuality (85): The article discusses the government's response to rising fuel prices and the criticism from international bodies. It references the UPB report and aligns with the primary source document’s context.
Why objectivity (80): The tone has a slight critical edge, highlighting the regression of the policy. While factual, it implies a judgment on the effectiveness of the government's approach.
Three days after the implementation of a tax cut on diesel fuel in Italy, the discount has not fully reached consumers at the pump. The average price of self-service diesel on highways remains 9 cents per liter lower than before the government intervention, which translates to a savings of only 4.5 euros for a 50-liter tank, significantly less than the expected 8.5 euros. Approximately 20% of fuel stations did not reduce prices, while some even increased them. The National Consumers Union highlights discrepancies between the intended tax reduction and the actual savings, suggesting that some companies may have exploited the situation by raising prices despite the tax cut.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data on fuel prices and their alignment with the government’s tax cuts, citing official statistics and consumer associations. It does not exhibit overtly biased language or one-sided sourcing but rather reports on the discrepancy between policy intent and market outcomes
Why factuality (85): The article discusses ongoing fuel price issues and potential new interventions, referencing recent data and government meetings. It aligns with the primary source's focus on price trends and government responses, though it does not cite the primary source directly.
Why objectivity (80): The tone suggests urgency and possible future action, indicating a concern for public welfare. While factual, it implies a need for further governmental steps.
Il Sole 24 OreParty-aligned🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 806 days ago
The Italian newspaper Il Sole 24 Ore reports on the impact of a recent tax cut on fuel prices, noting that nearly 700 gas stations increased their prices above the new rate, while over 2,500 remained unchanged. The Ministry of Enterprises and Made in Italy, under Minister Adolfo Urso, instructed the National Authority for Consumer Protection (Garante) to identify gas stations that had not adjusted their prices accordingly. These findings were shared with the Guardia di Finanza for further investigation. The price reduction, which lowered the cost of diesel by approximately 11 cents per liter, was influenced by both the tax cut and a drop in Brent crude oil prices.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data regarding the implementation of a government tax cut on fuel prices and the subsequent actions taken by regulatory authorities. It does not take a clear ideological stance but rather reports on the administrative process and market responses. The tone remains formal
Why factuality (85): This article discusses rising fuel prices and government response, citing specific locations like Milan and mentioning the impact on consumers. It aligns with the primary source's focus on price increases and government intervention, though it doesn't reference the primary source directly.
Why objectivity (80): The tone is more concerned and highlights the pressure on the government, implying urgency. While factual, it carries a slight emotional undertone regarding consumer impact.
ANSAIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 808 days ago
The Italian government has implemented a reduction in excise taxes on diesel fuel, effective from midnight today, as outlined in two decrees published in the Official Gazette. The measure reduces the excise tax by 17 cents per liter (including 14 cents in excise duty and 3 cents in reduced VAT), resulting in a savings of approximately 8.5 euros for a full tank of fuel. This discount applies until August 6, 2026, and is intended to alleviate rising fuel costs driven by geopolitical tensions in the Persian Gulf. The government chose to target diesel rather than gasoline because diesel traditionally costs more due to lower excise taxes aimed at supporting freight transportation. However, recent fiscal reforms sought to align excise rates between fuels, citing environmental concerns. Funding for this temporary relief comes from increased VAT revenue, Antitrust fines, and economic intervention funds.
Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced overview of the policy decision, explaining both the rationale behind targeting diesel over gasoline and the financial mechanisms used to fund the measure. It includes quotes from the government and mentions the impact on consumers without overtly favoring any side.
Why factuality (85): The article covers the government's response to high fuel prices, including upcoming council meetings and proposed interventions. It aligns with the primary source's focus on price changes and government action, though it does not reference the primary source directly.
Why objectivity (80): The tone reflects concern for consumers and the broader economic impact, suggesting urgency. While factual, it carries a subtle implication of public dissatisfaction.
The Italian government under Prime Minister Meloni has decided to implement a generalized tax cut on diesel fuel rather than targeted measures aimed at helping the most vulnerable families. This decision comes amid rising fuel prices and was made despite recommendations from international organizations like the IMF and the European Commission, which advocate for more focused interventions. The measure, approved by the Council of Ministers, brings the price of diesel back to around €2 per liter but fails to reduce it further due to limited financial resources. Critics argue that this approach disproportionately benefits those with larger vehicles and higher fuel consumption, exacerbating inequality. The Office of Parliamentary Budgeting had previously warned that such policies tend to benefit wealthier households more, as seen during the 2022 tax cuts under the Draghi government. The Ministry of Enterprises' former minister, Adolfo Urso, had also expressed concerns about the fiscal costs and inequity of broad-based subsidies.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the government’s decision as regressive and politically motivated, highlighting how the policy disproportionately benefits wealthier individuals and corporations. It emphasizes the recommendations of international institutions and criticizes the government for ignoring these calls
Why factuality (85): The article covers the government's decision to implement a new tax cut and mentions the opposition from certain ministers. It aligns with the primary source document’s context and provides relevant background.
Why objectivity (80): The article has a somewhat partisan tone, emphasizing the government's actions while noting the opposition from specific officials. It balances reporting but shows some leaning toward the government's position.
Il Sole 24 OreParty-aligned🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 809 days ago
The Italian government is preparing to introduce emergency measures to reduce fuel prices, particularly for diesel, ahead of the summer travel season. The Council of Ministers is expected to meet at 5:30 PM to approve a temporary intervention aimed at lowering costs. This follows discussions between Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and Economy Minister Giancarlo Giorgetti. The measure would initially target diesel prices and could later include mobile excise taxes based on July VAT data. The government has already spent around €1.8 billion since March on this issue and plans to assess available resources by August 4th. Additional funds from the EU are anticipated after parliamentary votes in September.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the government's planned interventions without overtly praising or criticizing them. It reports on the decision-making process, quotes officials, and outlines both current and potential measures without taking a clear ideological stance. While the topic is politically sensitive,
Why factuality (85): The article reports on government action regarding fuel prices, referencing the Council of Ministers meeting and potential interventions. It aligns with the primary source document’s mention of price changes and government measures but lacks specific data from the primary source. The information is
Why objectivity (80): The tone is informative but leans slightly towards urgency and public concern, suggesting the importance of the issue. While not overtly biased, there is an implied need for immediate governmental action.
la RepubblicaIndependent🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 809 days ago
The article discusses the Italian government's proposal to reduce taxes on diesel fuel while maintaining higher rates on gasoline. It mentions that the proposed tax cuts would require approximately 140 million euros in additional funding, which has not yet been secured. The current budget for covering the extra VAT revenue remains at 30 million euros. The article suggests that the new decree might exclude gasoline from the tax reduction plan, highlighting potential financial challenges and policy decisions related to energy taxation.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information about a proposed tax policy without overtly favoring either side of the political spectrum. It reports on the financial implications and policy considerations without taking a clear ideological stance, thus leaning toward center.
Why factuality (85): The article reports on the current state of fuel prices and government measures, aligning with the primary source document regarding the tax cut on diesel. It mentions the lack of funds and exclusion of gasoline from the new decree, which matches the information in the primary source. However, it do
Why objectivity (80): The tone remains informative but slightly leans towards highlighting the government’s challenges, which could be seen as a minor editorial bias. The article presents facts without overt emotional language.
ANSAIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 809 days ago
The Italian government is considering an emergency intervention focused on diesel prices to address rising fuel costs, which remain a top priority for Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni. The proposed measure aims to provide immediate relief ahead of the start of August, during which many citizens will begin their summer trips. The Ministry of Economy and Finance (Mef) has calculated additional tax revenue from July's extra VAT, which could be used to fund this initiative. While the government plans to act quickly, there are concerns over available resources, as current data shows diesel at €2.18 and gasoline at €1.98 per liter. The intervention would initially target diesel, with potential future measures involving mobile taxes once more data becomes available. The government is also preparing to assess available funds during a cabinet meeting on August 4th and is awaiting access to EU funds by September. Opposition parties criticize the focus on mobile taxes as insufficient and advocate for targeted support for vulnerable groups.
Bias read (Center): While the article discusses a politically sensitive issue, fuel price regulation, the framing remains balanced, presenting both government actions and opposition criticisms without overtly favoring either side. It reports on discussions within the government and mentions opposing viewpoints without sl
Why factuality (85): The article reports on government discussions regarding an intervention on fuel prices, particularly focusing on diesel. It references the MEF calculations and the upcoming Council of Ministers meeting. The information aligns with the primary source document’s context but lacks specific numerical da
Why objectivity (80): The tone is informative but leans slightly towards political discussion, mentioning specific ministers and their positions. While objective overall, there is some emphasis on the government's actions and potential measures.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Italy
