ON
← Back to feed
Candace Owens concedes no direct proof Israel killed Charlie Kirk in debate with Andrew Wilson
United States🏛️ PoliticsConservativeOverlooked by progressives8 days ago

Candace Owens concedes no direct proof Israel killed Charlie Kirk in debate with Andrew Wilson

Candace Owens participated in a live-streamed debate with Andrew Wilson, where she conceded she lacks direct evidence linking Israel to the assassination of Charlie Kirk. Despite this, she proposed an 'Israeli angle' based on unverified claims, such as the presence of Israeli-registered cellphones near the crime scene. Owens emphasized motives tied to Kirk's criticisms of pro-Israel donors and alleged unusual behavior from Israeli officials after his death. Former counterterrorism official Joe Kent mentioned the incident warranted further scrutiny but did not confirm the cellphone claim or identify a responsible nation. Kirk's wife, Erika, publicly criticized Owens for spreading these theories, though they later met privately. Tyler Robinson remains the sole suspect in Kirk's murder, with no official evidence of foreign involvement.

Charlie Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA, was assassinated on September 10, 2025, while addressing students at Utah Valley University. The attack occurred during a Q&A session in which Kirk was responding to questions about transgender mass shooters. According to court filings, the accused shooter, Tyler Robinson, 23, sent a message to his roommate and trans-identifying partner shortly after the shooting: “I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can’t be negotiated out.” Robinson remains the only person formally charged with aggravated murder in connection with the incident. The assassination came nearly seven years after a notable exchange between Kirk and Hasan Piker, a left-leaning political commentator known for his advocacy of Marxist ideology. Their debate took place at the 2018 Politicon convention in Los Angeles. During the discussion, Kirk challenged Piker's adherence to communist principles by asking him to demonstrate his beliefs through action. Kirk posed the question: “Why don’t you give 95% of your money away and go live on a commune?” Piker responded by questioning the feasibility of such a move, noting that even if he gave away a large portion of his income, it would not significantly impact systemic issues. When Kirk pressed further, Piker revealed that his annual salary was approximately $60,000, a figure he described as “a really good salary.” The exchange escalated when Cenk Uygur, Piker’s uncle and former employer at The Young Turks, interrupted to demand Kirk disclose his own earnings. Kirk countered by stating his income was less than Piker’s, suggesting that Uygur could verify the claim himself. The debate highlighted Kirk’s commitment to libertarian values, contrasting sharply with Piker’s progressive views. Since the 2018 encounter, Piker has gained prominence among far-left circles and has received support from figures such as Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Alexandria Ocaso-Cortez. His influence has expanded, leading to collaborations with Democratic candidates in states like New York and Michigan. Public estimates of Piker’s wealth vary, with Fox Business host Charles Payne placing his net worth at $35 million, although other sources suggest a lower figure. Regardless of the exact number, Piker resides in a $2.7 million home in West Hollywood, a stark contrast to the communal lifestyle he once advocated. In recent years, Piker has expressed controversial opinions, including praise for Chinese leader Mao Zedong and statements implying that the United States “deserved” the 9/11 attacks. These remarks led to his temporary suspension from the streaming platform Twitch in March 2025, marking his fifth such suspension. Additionally, Piker has endorsed policies that critics argue border on incitement, such as advocating for the theft of goods from large corporations, claiming that these entities exploit their own employees. Meanwhile, speculation surrounding Kirk’s assassination has persisted, particularly regarding potential foreign involvement. Candace Owens, a prominent conservative commentator, has theorized that Israel may have played a role in the killing, citing the presence of 12 Israeli-registered cellphones near the scene. However, Owens admitted during a televised debate with Andrew Wilson that she lacks direct evidence to substantiate this claim. The theory has drawn criticism, notably from Kirk’s widow, Erika, who publicly urged Owens to cease spreading unverified narratives. Despite this, Owens continues to promote her theories, asserting that the case involves a larger conspiracy. Law enforcement agencies have not found conclusive evidence of foreign involvement in Kirk’s death. The only individual charged with the crime is Tyler Robinson, whose motives remain unclear. As the investigation proceeds, the focus remains on determining the circumstances of Kirk’s assassination and ensuring justice is served.

Go to the primary sources (4)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

The Daily Wire logoThe Daily WireIndependentConservativeFactual 75Objective 408 days ago
FLASHBACK: Watch Charlie Kirk Expose Absurdity Of Hasan Piker’s Communist Dream

This article discusses a 2018 debate between conservative activist Charlie Kirk and left-wing streamer Hasan Piker, where Kirk challenged Piker's advocacy for communism by asking him to live according to his beliefs. During the exchange, Piker claimed his income would not justify giving away 95% of his earnings, while Kirk defended his own capitalist practices. The conversation escalated when Piker's uncle and employer, Cenk Uygur, questioned Kirk's financial practices. The article notes that Piker has since gained prominence among progressive circles and has been associated with figures like Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. It also mentions that Kirk was assassinated in 2025 due to his views on transgender issues, with the suspect expressing personal grievances against him.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames Hasan Piker as a 'communist' and 'America-hating' figure, using terms like 'left-wing streamer' and 'far-Left,' while portraying Charlie Kirk as a principled advocate of capitalism. The emphasis on Piker's alleged hypocrisy and Kirk's moral superiority aligns with conservative意识形态

Why factuality (75): The article accurately reports the 2018 Politicon debate between Charlie Kirk and Hasan Piker, including Kirk's question about Piker living by his communist ideals and Piker's response about his income. However, it omits key context such as the specific date of the debate (October 20, 2018) and does

Why objectivity (40): The article uses highly charged language such as 'America-hating communist streamer' and frames the exchange as a clear-cut ideological battle, favoring Kirk's perspective. It lacks neutrality in describing Piker's views and presents Kirk's arguments as more reasonable while portraying Piker as defe

The Washington Times logoThe Washington TimesParty-alignedConservativeFactual 60Objective 309 days ago
Candace Owens concedes no direct proof Israel killed Charlie Kirk in debate with Andrew Wilson

Candace Owens participated in a live-streamed debate with Andrew Wilson, where she conceded she lacks direct evidence linking Israel to the assassination of Charlie Kirk. Despite this, she proposed an 'Israeli angle' based on unverified claims, such as the presence of Israeli-registered cellphones near the crime scene. Owens emphasized motives tied to Kirk's criticisms of pro-Israel donors and alleged unusual behavior from Israeli officials after his death. Former counterterrorism official Joe Kent mentioned the incident warranted further scrutiny but did not confirm the cellphone claim or identify a responsible nation. Kirk's wife, Erika, publicly criticized Owens for spreading these theories, though they later met privately. Tyler Robinson remains the sole suspect in Kirk's murder, with no official evidence of foreign involvement.

Bias read (Conservative): The article presents Owens’ unsubstantiated claims about Israeli involvement in Kirk’s death, which align with right-wing narratives often questioning official accounts and suggesting foreign conspiracies. The framing emphasizes Owens’ lack of concrete evidence while highlighting her persistent, unv

Why factuality (60): The article mentions Candace Owens discussing theories about Israeli involvement in Charlie Kirk's death but fails to provide sufficient context about the actual circumstances of Kirk's death. It references an unverified claim about Israeli-registered cellphones near the scene without clarifying tha

Why objectivity (30): The article exhibits strong bias by presenting Owens' unverified claims as plausible without challenging them. It uses phrases like 'conspiracy building' and gives significant weight to unsubstantiated allegations. The tone is clearly sympathetic to Owens' narrative and lacks balance by not addressi

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories