Canadian teens still rank among the world’s best in reading, math and science — but scores are slipping. Here’s why
The article reports that Canadian teenagers continue to rank among the top performers globally in reading, mathematics, and science according to international assessments, although their scores have been declining over time. The piece explores potential reasons behind this trend, including changes in educational approaches, resource allocation, and societal factors affecting student performance. It highlights concerns about maintaining high academic standards while addressing underlying challenges impacting learning outcomes. The focus remains on understanding the causes of the gradual decline rather than attributing blame to specific groups or policies.
Canadian students' reading and math scores have declined in the OECD's latest global assessment, though they remain among the top performers globally. Results from the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), released Tuesday, show Canada ranked in the top 10 out of 91 countries and economies evaluated. The OECD conducts PISA every three years to measure the performance of 15-year-olds in science, math, and reading. This cycle focused primarily on science, with math and reading also assessed using fewer questions. In 2025, approximately 24,600 students from the 10 provinces took part in the assessment. Canada’s scores in science, math, and reading have all fallen, a trend observed in many other nations. In science, the average score dropped five points from 2022. Math scores fell 12 points, and reading scores decreased by 17 points. Most other countries also experienced similar or greater declines. Andreas Schleicher, the OECD’s director for education and skills, noted that while scores have declined, Canada continues to perform strongly compared to most OECD countries. He described Canada as a “success story” due to its resilient academic outcomes. Anna Stokke, a mathematics professor at the University of Winnipeg, remarked that Canadian students are “near the top of a falling curve.” In math, 26 percent of Canadian students performed below level 2, the baseline proficiency needed for societal participation. Only 11.1 percent achieved levels 5 and 6, the highest levels. These figures contrast with 2003, when 10.1 percent performed below level 2 and 20.3 percent reached higher levels. In reading, 21.8 percent of students performed below level 2 in 2025, up from 9.5 percent in 2003. Just 9.4 percent reached levels 5 and 6, down from 12.6 percent in 2003. Science performance followed a similar pattern, with 16 percent of students scoring below level 2, compared to 10 percent in 2006. Provincial variations were also noted. New Brunswick had the highest percentage of students performing below level 2 in reading, at 33 percent. Ontario had the lowest, at 20.9 percent. Alberta led in reaching higher reading levels, with 12.3 percent achieving levels 5 and 6, while New Brunswick had the smallest percentage at 5.1 percent. Paris Semansky, co-executive director of People for Education, urged provinces with higher scores to share best practices. She asked, “What can the rest of the country learn that makes sense and is adaptable?” Schleicher emphasized the concern over declining reading skills, noting their importance in today’s world. Students now struggle more with complex texts and distinguishing fact from fiction.
2 reports
CBC NewsState / PublicCenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 92
Recent OECD test results show that Canadian teenagers performed relatively well overall, but there were notable declines in their scores for reading and mathematics. These drops have raised concerns among educators and policymakers regarding the quality of education and student preparedness in these critical areas. The findings highlight potential challenges within the Canadian educational system that require further investigation and possible intervention. Experts suggest that addressing these issues could involve reviewing teaching methods, curriculum content, and support systems for students.
Bias read (Center): The article presents statistical data on educational performance without overtly favoring any particular political stance. It highlights both positive outcomes and areas of concern, maintaining a balanced perspective by noting the need for further investigation rather than attributing blame to any一方
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (92): The tone remains largely neutral and informative, presenting both positive and negative aspects of the data without overt bias or emotional language.
Toronto StarIndependentCenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 80
The article reports that Canadian teenagers continue to rank among the top performers globally in reading, mathematics, and science according to international assessments, although their scores have been declining over time. The piece explores potential reasons behind this trend, including changes in educational approaches, resource allocation, and societal factors affecting student performance. It highlights concerns about maintaining high academic standards while addressing underlying challenges impacting learning outcomes. The focus remains on understanding the causes of the gradual decline rather than attributing blame to specific groups or policies.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced overview of the issue without overtly favoring any particular political ideology. It focuses on analyzing trends and possible contributing factors without taking a clear partisan stance. While the decline in scores is presented as a concern, the framing does not align
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (80): The tone remains neutral, presenting the facts without overt bias. While it highlights the decline, it also acknowledges the strong rankings, providing a balanced view. The article includes some contextual analysis but does not take a definitive position on the implications of the score drops.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.