Even 70 percent of Croats think we're going in the wrong direction, here's who we like the most

Novi listIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 859 days ago

In the local council elections held in Kastav, candidates from the Social Democratic Party (SDP) emerged as the clear winners, securing 330 votes or 51% of the total. The SDP candidates were elected across multiple districts, including Kastav, Brnčići, Rešetari, Spinčići, and Rubeši. Candidates from the Action of Young People (AM) came second with 121 votes or 18.70%, followed by the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) with 107 votes or 16.54%, and the Patriotic Community of Croats (PGS) with 89 votes or 13.76%. A total of 651 voters participated, representing 6.98% of the registered electorate. The newly elected members include representatives from all five districts, with the SDP maintaining a strong presence.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents the results of local council elections where the SDP, a traditionally left-leaning party, secured the majority of votes. While the article does not explicitly frame the outcome as favorable or unfavorable, the emphasis on the SDP’s victory and the detailed listing of their elect

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): The article provides specific election results in Kastav with clear percentages and candidate names. It is factual and neutral in presenting the outcomes without overt bias.

Net.hrIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 802 days ago

The article reports on a new CRO Demoskop survey conducted by RTL Hrvatska, which ranks political parties based on popularity and negativity ratings. The survey shows HDZ remains at the top with a significant lead over SDP and other opposition parties. Zoran Milanović is the most positively viewed figure, while Prime Minister Andrej Plenković is the most negatively viewed. The survey was conducted using a representative sample of 1,300 participants via CATI method, stratified by region and demographic factors. The results highlight the ongoing political dynamics in Croatia, particularly focusing on public perception of leaders and parties.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the survey findings in an objective manner, providing data without overtly favoring any particular political stance. It reports on the rankings and perceptions of political figures and parties without editorializing or emphasizing one side over another. The framing remains cent,

Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 80): The article presents survey data from CRO Demoskop accurately, providing methodology details. It remains largely neutral but focuses on HDZ's lead, slightly favoring their position.

Net.hrIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 752 days ago

A new CRO Demoskop survey conducted by agency Promocija Plus for RTL reveals the current state of political preferences among Croatian voters. The HDZ leads with 27.3% support, followed by the SDP at 22%, while 'Možemo!' stands at 12%. Positive perceptions of politicians include Zoran Milanović, Andrej Plenković, and Zagreb mayor Tomislav Tomašević. On the negative side, Prime Minister Andrej Plenković is viewed most negatively by 33% of respondents, followed by President Zoran Milanović at 11%, and DP leader Ivan Penava surpassing Tomašević in negativity. Key issues discussed include the murder of a high school student in Drniš, which sparked reforms in the justice system, high inflation in the Eurozone, crime in sports federations, the war in the Middle East, and recent anti-inflation measures introduced by the government.

Bias read (Center): The article presents survey results objectively, highlighting both positive and negative perceptions of political figures and parties without overtly favoring any side. It includes data on public opinion and contextualizes it with relevant national issues, maintaining neutrality in framing.

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 75): Factual based on the CRO Demoskop survey data, aligning with cross-source consensus. Objectivity slightly compromised by promotional tone and lack of contextual depth.

Večernji listIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 605 days ago

The article discusses tensions within Croatia's ruling coalition, focusing on the conflict between Prime Minister Andrej Plenković and President Zoran Milanović over Croatia's participation in a military parade in Paris. Plenković criticized Milanović for his negative stance toward the 'Coalition of Willing,' which includes countries participating in the event. The disagreement has spilled into the ruling coalition, revealing similar divisions within the main HDZ ally, the Homeland Defense Movement (Domovinski Pokret). This internal discord raises questions about the stability of the current government and its ability to maintain unity.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation neutrally, highlighting both the criticism from the prime minister and the subsequent revelation of internal divisions within the ruling coalition. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing that would indicate a clear lean.

Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 60): Factual about political dynamics but lacks balance, focusing more on criticism of Milanović with less attention to alternative viewpoints.

Telegram.hrIndependentCenterFactual 70Objective 552 days ago

The July CRO Demoskop survey by RTL Danas reveals a decline in support for the main political parties HDZ and SDP, while smaller parties like 'Možemo!' and 'Most' show growth. HDZ remains the most supported party with 27% approval, followed by SDP at 21.5%. 'Možemo!' has risen slightly to 12.2%, and 'Most' now holds nearly 8%. Smaller parties such as IDS, DOMiNO, and others have minimal support. Approximately 17% of respondents remain undecided. President Zoran Milanović leads the list of positive politicians with nearly 25% approval, though he experienced a slight decline compared to June. Prime Minister Andrej Plenković has lower approval at 16.8%, but his negative perception has increased. The survey also highlights that 70% of respondents believe Croatia is moving in the wrong direction.

Bias read (Center): The article presents survey data objectively, showing shifts in party support and public opinion without overtly favoring any side. It includes both positive and negative perceptions of political figures and provides balanced context about the overall sentiment toward the country's direction.

Why these scores (Factual 70 · Objective 55): Focuses on political polling data rather than the main event. While factual about poll results, it lacks depth on the core issue and appears more like commentary than news, reducing objectivity.

Net.hrIndependentCenterFactual 65Objective 502 days ago

A recent survey by CRO Demoskop conducted between June 30 and July 2 reveals shifting public opinion toward political parties and figures in Croatia. Both the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) and the Social Democratic Party (SDP) experienced slight declines in their ratings over the past three months. HDZ would have led in hypothetical early July elections with 27%, but continues its downward trend. The SDP holds 21.5%, while 'Možemo!' ranks third at 12.2%. Smaller parties like Most (now at nearly 8%) show modest gains, whereas the former club member Marija Selak Raspudić’s party remains low at 2.2%. Approximately 17% of respondents remain undecided. President Kolinda Grabar-Kitarović maintains the highest positive rating at nearly 25%, though she has seen a slight decline compared to June. Prime Minister Andrej Plenković, despite a rise in positive perception, remains significantly lower on the positive scale. Zagreb Mayor Tomislav Tomašević dropped slightly in positive ratings but still ranks third. On the negative side, Plenković leads with 34.3%, followed closely by Grabar-Kitarović. Other notable figures include Sandra Benčić, Dalija Orešković, and Vili Beroš. Overall, 70% of C

Bias read (Center): The article presents survey data on political party ratings and public sentiment without overtly favoring any particular political group. It reports both positive and negative perceptions of various politicians and parties neutrally, using standard journalistic language. There is no clear emphasis,

Why these scores (Factual 65 · Objective 50): Contains incomplete quotes and focuses on political analysis rather than factual reporting. The article seems to present opinion rather than objective analysis, reducing both factuality and objectivity.