ON
← Back to feed
The solution is not to line them up like slugs and make them run
Croatia🏛️ PoliticsOverlooked from the right4 days ago

The solution is not to line them up like slugs and make them run

The article discusses the controversy surrounding HNK Hajduk Split's decision to send captain Marko Livaja home for disciplinary reasons, which has sparked divided public reactions. While some support the club's stance as a demonstration that no one is above the team, others criticize the treatment of Livaja, whom they view as an icon of the club. Former Croatian parliamentarian Ante Čačić, speaking on HRT's open program, criticizes the approach taken by coach Gonzalo García, arguing that it is unreasonable and unprofessional. He compares the punishment to a doctor prescribing a harsh penalty after a patient forgets to take medication, suggesting it could be seen as harmful. Čačić also expresses broader concerns about the state of Croatian football, including the lack of investment in local players and the influence of external factors in player recruitment. He argues that this trend undermines the development of Croatian football. Similarly, coach Samir Toplak criticizes the decision, stating that Hajduk has become overly dependent on Livaja and that García made a mistake by prioritizing him over the team’s collective success.

Marko Livaja, jedan od najvažnijih simbola Hrvatskog nogometa, uvelike je doprinio prestihu Hajduka u posljednjih nekoliko sezona. Njegova prisutnost na terenu, kao i njegova popularnost među fanovima, čini ga ne samo ključnim igračem, već i ikonom jednog grada – Splita. Međutim, njegova sudbina je postala centar brojnih diskusija i kritika, posebno nakon što je bio potjeran s priprema izvan domaćinstva, što je izazvalo šok i rasprstu u javnosti. U tom kontekstu, stručnjaci i bivši igrači, kao što su Marin Galić, Ante Čačić i Samir Toplak, dao su svoje komentare o situaciji i njezinim posljedicama.

Galić, sportski stručnjak i docent na Sveučilištu Sjever, naglasio je da je odnos između trenera Gonzala Garcije i Livaje od početka bio narušen. Prema njemu, Garcija nije uspio postati blizu Livaje, što je doveles do nepovratne situacije. "Odnos Garcije i Livaje od početka je narušen, nije postajao kontakt, to se vidjelo kroz cijelu prošlu sezonu," objasnio je. Galić je također istaknuo da je Livaja, iako "polubog", isto i "polučovjek", a Garcija nije polubog. Prema njemu, ovo je završnica jedne ere, a ne povratak, jer je Livaja više nije imao isti status kao ranije. "Po meni, ovo je skoro sigurno kraj, zato što tu povratka više nema," dodao je.

Čačić, bivši izbornik Hrvatske, bio je jedan od najjasnijih kritičara prema postupku Hajduka. U emisiji Otvoreno, rekao je da je pristup koji je koristio Garcija neshvatljiv. "Ono što me čudi kao trenera jest da igrača koji je napravio neki disciplinski prekršaj sutradan tjeraš na dodatni fizički rad. To je kao da svojoj liječnici kažem da sam ujutro zaboravio popiti tabletu, a ona mi na to kaže: 'Sad za kaznu popijte tri.' Pokušava li me ubiti? Ne razumijem," objasnio je. Čačić je također naglasio da je Livaja ne zaslužuje takav pristup, a da je to neprimjerno prema hrvatskim stručnjacima. "Nemam ništa protiv da naši treneri rade vani, ali pogledajte koji su sve treneri prošli kroz hrvatsku ligu i kakav su trag ostavili," dodao je.

Toplak, trener Hajduka, također je kritizirao potez stručnog stožera. "Nikada u povijesti Hajduk nije bio toliko ovisan o jednom igraču kao što je o Livaji. Ono u čemu je Garcia pogriješio jest to da kao trener najboljeg igrača uvijek želiš imati uz sebe, a ne protiv sebe. Ne želim preko najboljeg igrača momčadi graditi svoj ego," objasnio je. Toplak je također istaknuo da se olako obezvrjeđuju legende Hajduka, koje su jako puno dale za taj klub. "Mogu ih nabrojiti desetak koji su klub napustili na nedopustiv način," dodao je.

U kontekstu ove situacije, Galić je također analizirao rezultate i očekivanja. "Rezultatski, nažalost, nije postigao ono što je trebalo – to je osvajanje titule. Onda bi bio apsolutni Bog, onda bi mu se vjerojatno i još neke druge stvari oprostile, odnosno kroz nekoliko godina, uvijek treba proći nekoliko godina da se to sve slegne i onda se dobije konačni ishod. Onda bi on bio Bog. Ovako, uvijek će ostati ta praznina da nije osvojio titulu," objasnio je.

Osim toga, Galić je komentirao i očekivanje drugačijeg krajevnog razvoja. "Možemo se vratiti vjerojatno i priči između Perišića i Hajduka. Svi su očekivali neki drugačiji, ljepši kraj, pa nije bio baš jako lijep. Ovo je kraj jedne ere, jedne era koja će biti svakako obilježena velikim, masovnim, nije to povratak, ali recimo, još većim učešćem navijača u samom klubu. Vidite koliko su se povećale pretplate, koje su znak potpore kluba, otkad je došao Livaja," dodao je.

Uz sve to, Galić je također analizirao utakmicu s Portugalom, koja je privukla veliku pažnju. "Klasična priča, kapitalistička ponuda i potražnja. Potražnja očito je pala i samim time automatski cijene padaju. Činjenica je da je to možda jedna od najatraktivnijih, možda i najatrativnija utakmica. Imate u krajnjem slučaju tri utakmice gdje igraju Europljani među sobom. Ovo je jedna od te tri, možda vjerojatno i najatrativnija. Portugal, bivši europski prvak, Hrvatska viceprvak, treće mjesto u Kataru, Modrić versus Ronaldo zadnji put. Prema tome, tu postoji jedna priča, jedna savršeni scenarij za jednu dobru priču, ali je tržište očito pokazalo drugačije," objasnio je.

Sve ukupno, situacija s Livajom i Hajdukom postala je centar širokog diskursa o stanju hrvatskog nogometa. Kritike su se usredsređile na pristup trenera, sportskog direktora i općeg pristupa prema ključnim igračima. Uz to, postoji i očekivanje da će se situacija promijeniti, ali sadašnji trenutak predstavlja završnicu jedne ere, koja će ostati u pameti fanova i stručnjaka.

3 reports

Net.hr logoNet.hrIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 554 days ago
Hajduk drama expert: 'The lion is half-deaf, but did not achieve what was needed'

The article discusses the situation involving Croatian footballer Marko Livaja and his relationship with Hajduk Split club and coach Gonzalo García. Initially, there were reports suggesting Livaja might leave the club, but it was later clarified he remained with the team after being temporarily sent to Slovenia for preparation. Sports expert Marin Galić comments on the strained relationship between García and Livaja, noting a lack of communication throughout the season. He suggests that if the coach had resigned after this incident, it would signal the end of an era for the club. Galić acknowledges Livaja’s significance to the club but notes that his influence has diminished compared to previous years. The article concludes by reflecting on the broader implications of Livaja’s tenure and the expectations surrounding his future with the club.

Bias read (Center): The article focuses on a sports-related issue involving a football player and club dynamics, which is considered apolitical. There is no clear ideological leaning in the framing of the story, and the discussion remains focused on the professional relationships and outcomes within the sports context.

Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 55): Factual accuracy is good but includes subjective analysis from a sports expert. Objectivity is low due to biased commentary suggesting Livaja’s departure is inevitable.

Index.hr logoIndex.hrIndependentLeft4 days ago
The solution is not to line them up like slugs and make them run

The article discusses the controversy surrounding HNK Hajduk Split's decision to send captain Marko Livaja home for disciplinary reasons, which has sparked divided public reactions. While some support the club's stance as a demonstration that no one is above the team, others criticize the treatment of Livaja, whom they view as an icon of the club. Former Croatian parliamentarian Ante Čačić, speaking on HRT's open program, criticizes the approach taken by coach Gonzalo García, arguing that it is unreasonable and unprofessional. He compares the punishment to a doctor prescribing a harsh penalty after a patient forgets to take medication, suggesting it could be seen as harmful. Čačić also expresses broader concerns about the state of Croatian football, including the lack of investment in local players and the influence of external factors in player recruitment. He argues that this trend undermines the development of Croatian football. Similarly, coach Samir Toplak criticizes the decision, stating that Hajduk has become overly dependent on Livaja and that García made a mistake by prioritizing him over the team’s collective success.

Bias read (Left): The article frames the criticism of Hajduk's handling of Livaja as a broader critique of the state of Croatian football, emphasizing systemic issues such as the undervaluing of local talent and the influence of external factors. The language used suggests a concern for the integrity and development,

Jutarnji list logoJutarnji listIndependentCenter4 days ago
The former selector of the Firemen answered: "Well, they're not ballads, the Leftist didn't deserve it!

The article discusses the controversy surrounding Marko Livaja, a player who was expelled from Hajduk's training session after refusing to complete additional running as punishment for participating in an informal 'team-building' activity following Croatia's World Cup victory. The incident has sparked reactions from various experts, commentators, and fans, with some criticizing the club's disciplinary approach. Former Croatian national team coach Ante Čačić and former player Samir Toplak both commented on the situation, with Čačić arguing that Livaja does not deserve such treatment and questioning the broader state of Croatian football. Toplak emphasized the club's over-reliance on Livaja and criticized the handling of his departure.

Bias read (Center): The article focuses on a sports-related issue involving a football club and player, which is considered apolitical. While there are strong opinions expressed by former players and coaches, the discussion remains within the realm of sports management and does not involve political ideology or policy.

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories