50mph speed limits and double cost of second homes: What Burnham should do in first 100 days, according to Labour pressure group

Prime Minister Andy Burnham faces mounting pressure from within his own party to implement a 2% wealth tax targeting the UK’s wealthiest citizens, according to reports emerging late on Monday. The proposal, backed by a prominent Labour-aligned think tank, comes amid broader calls for increased state oversight of the media sector. The push follows Burnham’s recent ascension to leadership, replacing Keir Starmer, and signals a shift toward more aggressive fiscal policy from the new administration. The proposal originates from Compass, a progressive Labour-linked organization led by Neal Lawson. In a newly released report, Compass urges Burnham to impose a 2% levy on net wealth exceeding £10 million during his upcoming Budget on 28 October. According to the group, the measure could generate £24 billion annually and apply to approximately 22,000 individuals. Additionally, Compass advocates for aligning capital gains taxation with income tax rates, estimating this could yield an extra £11 billion each year from high-net-worth individuals. Critics of the plan argue that such measures risk deterring investment and innovation, potentially undermining the UK’s economic stability. Sir Mel Stride, the Conservative Party’s shadow chancellor, warned that yielding to these demands would convey a message that Britain lacks ambition or appeal for entrepreneurs and investors. “Andy Burnham has barely settled into his role, yet his allies are already drafting a list of targets,” Stride stated. He criticized the Labour Party as a whole, suggesting that Burnham’s approach, characterized by higher taxation, increased borrowing, and greater spending, would burden taxpayers financially. Opposition voices have echoed concerns over the feasibility and effectiveness of wealth taxes. Robert Jenrick, Reform’s economic spokesperson, emphasized historical evidence showing such levies often fail to meet their intended goals. “Wealth taxes don’t work,” Jenrick said. “Millionaires will not absorb every tax increase; instead, they’ll exit the country, dragging their businesses, jobs, and tax revenues with them.” He called for the government to prioritize reducing public expenditure and implementing economic reforms rather than focusing on new tax initiatives. Daniel Herring, head of Fiscal and Economic Policy at the Centre for Policy Studies, concurred with the skepticism surrounding wealth taxes. He described them as both unjust and impractical, arguing that they deter growth and investment. Herring advised Burnham to disregard internal pressures advocating for such taxes if he aims to revive the British economy. Despite these criticisms, some Labour members remain supportive of the proposed wealth tax. The number of millionaires in the UK has declined by 7% since 2024 following the previous Labour government’s tax hikes under ex-Chancellor Rachel Reeves. However, current Labour leaders are leveraging this trend to advocate for even more radical financial policies under Burnham’s leadership. Labour MP Andy McDonald suggested that the party should seriously consider introducing a wealth tax, along with potential reforms to replace the existing council tax system. Similarly, Jon Trickett, another Labour MP, argued that a carefully structured wealth tax could both fund progressive social programs and address public discontent over rising inequality. Burnham’s new Chancellor, John Healey, is scheduled to present the Autumn Budget on 28 October, a date that will likely become a focal point for debates over the government’s fiscal strategy. As discussions intensify, the coming months will reveal whether Burnham chooses to heed the calls for a wealth tax or pursue alternative approaches to address economic challenges.