ON
← Back to feed
Federal competition authority investigates Foodora
Austria🏛️ PoliticsCenter8/31/2026

Federal competition authority investigates Foodora

The Austrian Federal Competition Authority (BWB) has initiated formal investigations into online food delivery platforms, suspecting abuse of market dominance by companies like Foodora and Lieferando. The authority reports that these platforms control a significant portion of the Austrian market, with Foodora holding around 50-60% and Lieferando approximately 40-50%. Restaurants increasingly rely on these platforms, often earning up to 30% of their revenue through them. The BWB criticizes exclusive clauses, price-fixing agreements, and penalty fees, which they argue limit competition and negatively impact both restaurants and delivery workers. The investigation was based on data collected from over 2,500 restaurants in Vienna, highlighting growing concerns about market concentration and its effects on pricing, offerings, and working conditions.

The Austrian Federal Cartel Office has initiated formal investigations into Foodora over allegations of abuse of dominant market power in the online food delivery sector. The probe follows a completed market study that identified concerns regarding the dominance of platforms such as Foodora and Lieferando, which together control approximately 90 to 100 percent of the domestic market. According to the Federal Cartel Office (BWB), restaurants increasingly depend on these services, with some earning up to 25 to 30 percent of their revenue through online platforms. The authority criticized exclusive agreements, strict price clauses, unilateral contract changes, and penalty fees imposed on restaurants. These findings were partially forwarded to KommAustria, the regulatory body responsible for enforcing the European Union's Digital Services Act (DSA). The investigation was launched after the BWB concluded its examination of the online food delivery market, which began in March 2023. During this period, the authority surveyed around 2,500 gastronomic businesses in Vienna. The results revealed several problematic practices, including exclusivity clauses that required restaurants to pause operations on competing platforms in exchange for better contract terms. This issue became more pronounced following the entry of Wolt, a new player in the market launched in 2023. Additionally, tight price clauses prevented local eateries from offering meals cheaper on their own online channels. The BWB questioned the economic necessity of such restrictions. Restaurants also reported instances of one-sided contract modifications and penalties of up to €10 for delays in meal preparation. Approximately one-third of the surveyed businesses complained about poor accessibility, prompting the BWB to share its findings with KommAustria for further review under the DSA. The investigation does not conclude with mere recommendations but marks the beginning of formal proceedings against suspected abuse of a dominant market position. These proceedings allow the BWB to thoroughly investigate potential cartel law violations. They could lead to legal action before the Competition Court or result in the case being dropped. The principle of innocence applies, emphasized by the BWB. Foodora confirmed that the BWB has initiated an investigation and stated it would fully cooperate with the authority while carefully reviewing the outcomes. However, the company clarified that the initiation of an investigation does not imply any actual violation of competition laws. The company expressed willingness to engage with the BWB and await the final conclusions of the probe. According to the BWB’s General Director, Natalie Harsdorf, digital platforms have brought innovative solutions that efficiently connect restaurants with customers, providing new impulses for the gastronomy industry. However, she warned that the consolidation of market power among certain platforms can disrupt competitive balance, negatively affecting prices, offerings, and working conditions for delivery personnel. The BWB highlighted the need to maintain fair competition and prevent excessive dependence of restaurants on specific platforms. The market structure shows that Foodora dominates the Viennese market with a share of 50 to 60 percent, while Lieferando leads in other parts of Austria with around 40 to 50 percent. Although Wolt has been gradually expanding since its launch in 2023, the market still presents significant barriers to entry. For many restaurants, online delivery services have become a crucial sales channel, contributing significantly to their overall revenue. The BWB’s findings suggest that the current market dynamics may require regulatory intervention to ensure fair competition and protect the interests of both restaurants and consumers. The ongoing investigation will determine whether the alleged practices constitute a breach of competition laws and what measures, if any, should be taken to address them. The outcome of this process will have implications for the future of the online food delivery sector in Austria.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

Der Standard logoDer StandardIndependentCenterFactual 88Objective 828/31/2026
Federal competition authority investigates Foodora

The Austrian Federal Competition Authority (BWB) has initiated investigations against Foodora, suspecting abuse of market dominance. The authority criticizes problematic contract clauses and penalty fees, particularly concerning exclusivity agreements that force restaurants to pause operations on competing platforms. Foodora confirmed the investigation but emphasized that it does not confirm any violation of competition law. The BWB highlights growing dependency of restaurants on these platforms, which could negatively impact prices, offerings, and working conditions for delivery personnel. The investigation includes data from over 2,500 restaurants in Vienna, revealing increased discount campaigns by Foodora alongside the entry of Wolt into the market.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the regulatory action taken by the BWB against Foodora, citing both the authority’s concerns and Foodora’s response. It avoids taking sides in the debate over market dominance and focuses on factual reporting rather than ideological framing. While the issue

Why factuality (88): This article confirms the initiation of antitrust investigations by the BWB against Foodora, citing similar concerns about market dominance and contractual terms. It includes direct quotes from Foodora confirming the investigation and their stance on not implying legal violations. The facts are pres

Why objectivity (82): The article maintains a balanced tone, providing both the regulatory perspective and Foodora's official statement. There is no overt bias or emotional language, making it more objective than the first article.

Kurier logoKurierParty-alignedCenterFactual 85Objective 788/31/2026
Federal competition authority investigates Foodora

The Austrian Federal Competition Authority (BWB) has initiated formal investigations into online food delivery platforms, suspecting abuse of market dominance by companies like Foodora and Lieferando. The authority reports that these platforms control a significant portion of the Austrian market, with Foodora holding around 50-60% and Lieferando approximately 40-50%. Restaurants increasingly rely on these platforms, often earning up to 30% of their revenue through them. The BWB criticizes exclusive clauses, price-fixing agreements, and penalty fees, which they argue limit competition and negatively impact both restaurants and delivery workers. The investigation was based on data collected from over 2,500 restaurants in Vienna, highlighting growing concerns about market concentration and its effects on pricing, offerings, and working conditions.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the regulatory actions taken by the Austrian Federal Competition Authority against dominant food delivery platforms. It outlines the findings of the investigation without overtly favoring either the platforms or the restaurant industry. While the issue of '

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports that the Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde has initiated formal investigations into Foodora due to suspected abuse of market dominance. It provides specific market share percentages and mentions the concerns about exclusive clauses and penalty fees. The information aligns with

Why objectivity (78): The tone remains generally neutral, presenting both the regulatory action and Foodora's response. However, there is a slight editorial lean towards highlighting the issues with the platforms, particularly in the concluding sentence that suggests these practices are problematic.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories