ON
← Back to feed
2TDK approved the request for the March drive of Bratuškova and Gobola: 55 thousand for stopping works and 652 thousand for acceleration
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsConservativeOverlooked by progressives

2TDK approved the request for the March drive of Bratuškova and Gobola: 55 thousand for stopping works and 652 thousand for acceleration

The infrastructure management company 2TDK has officially confirmed the existence of a cost claim filed by the construction contractor SŽ-Železniško gradbeno podjetje Ljubljana regarding a demonstration train ride on the unfinished second rail track between Divača and Koper. The claim, submitted in May 2026 and supplemented in June 2026, totals approximately 714,224 euros including VAT, comprising 55,853 euros for work stoppages and 652,259 euros for accelerated completion measures. This event occurred on March 1, 2026, just before parliamentary elections, when Prime Minister Robert Golob and Infrastructure Minister Alenka Bratušek rode an extraordinary train along the incomplete line. While 2TDK stated that such claims are standard practice in construction projects, they noted that the supervising engineer DRI has not yet issued a decision on the validity of the costs. The article highlights that 2TDK’s response did not clarify whether the specific work interruptions and measurements were necessary for regular testing or solely for the political event, nor did it explain the contractual basis for these additional charges.

The new management of Slovenia’s state railway infrastructure company, 2TDK, has identified a claim for additional costs totaling approximately 714,224 euros including VAT as its primary initial review item. This financial demand stems from a demonstrative train ride conducted on March 11, 2026, involving then-Prime Minister Robert Golob and Infrastructure Minister Alenka Bratušek along the unfinished second track between Divaca and Koper. The claim was submitted by the contractor consortium, SŽ-Železniško gradbeno podjetje Ljubljana, and officially confirmed by 2TDK. The total amount comprises two distinct parts: 55,853.42 euros excluding VAT for temporary work stoppages and 652,259.36 euros excluding VAT for accelerated completion works. These figures sum to just under 708,000 euros before tax. The political controversy surrounding this expense intensified recently with statements from former Infrastructure Minister Alenka Bratušek. In response to media reports regarding the appointment of Aleksander Srdic as the new prosecutor at 2TDK, Bratušek posted on social media platform X that she had not proposed Srdic for the role and would never have done so herself. She further stated that individuals who actively worked against the second track had no business seeking positions there. Minutes after publishing this message, Bratušek deleted the latter portion of her statement, leaving only the denial of her involvement in Srdic’s nomination. When questioned by reporters about the deletion and the basis for labeling Srdic as an opponent of the project, Bratušek did not provide immediate clarification. Reporters also asked whether the ministry she led had formally proposed his appointment or dismissal, given that the government acts as the assembly for such decisions based on ministerial proposals. Background on the disputed costs reveals that the second track was not ready for regular traffic during the March demonstration. According to unofficial information obtained by investigative portal Zanima.me, contractors were required to halt all operations and remove personnel from the site for 59 hours, spanning from Monday, March 9, to Wednesday evening, March 11, 2026. This suspension was necessary for measurements of dynamic parameters. The key unresolved question is whether these tests and the subsequent work stoppage were strictly required by the engineering schedule or if they were adjusted to accommodate the politically timed event shortly before parliamentary elections. Unofficial reports suggest that instructions for preparing the event originated partly from the cabinet of the then-minister. The contractor began asserting these additional costs in May 2026, following the general elections but while Bratušek still held the infrastructure portfolio. A formal valuation was submitted on June 24, 2026. The supervising engineer, DRI, received the claim on May 5, 2026, and was copied on the supplementary documents. 2TDK stated that submitting such claims is standard practice in construction projects. However, the company emphasized that the mere submission does not guarantee payment. The claim is currently undergoing multi-level technical assessment. As of the latest reports, 2TDK has not yet received a proposal decision from DRI regarding the validity of the claim. Consequently, it remains undetermined how much of the requested sum will actually be approved. Current leadership at 2TDK, headed since mid-October by Marko Pogačnik, indicated that this specific claim would be among the first matters scrutinized in detail. Questions remain unanswered regarding which cost items relate specifically to the political event versus routine testing. There is no public breakdown explaining whether the 59-hour interruption would have occurred without the demonstration. Additionally, it is unclear who formally decided on the measurement timeline within 2TDK or if documented records exist for those decisions. Prime Minister Janez Janša previously described the incident as involving the two most expensive tickets in human history, highlighting the political sensitivity of the issue. The final determination of liability and payment awaits the technical review process currently underway.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

Info360 logoInfo360IndependentConservativeFactual 95Objective 85
Brother: "People who actively worked against the second track have no business there"

The article discusses a statement made by Slovenian Minister Alenka Bratušek regarding the appointment of Aleksander Srdić as the new auditor of state-owned company 2TDK. Initially, the article reported that Bratušek had proposed Srdić for the position, but she later denied this claim on social media. She stated that she would never have recommended Srdić, accusing those who actively opposed the 'second track' (likely referring to a specific policy or initiative) of having no place at 2TDK. However, she deleted part of her message shortly after posting it, leaving only the denial of proposing Srdić. The article raises questions about why Bratušek deleted part of her statement and what evidence led her to label Srdić as someone opposing the second track. It also notes that the government appoints and removes board members based on proposals from the relevant ministry, prompting further inquiry into who actually submitted the proposal for Srdić’s appointment.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames Bratušek's comments as a direct accusation against Srdić, using strong language such as 'osebe, ki so aktivno delale proti drugemu tiru tam nimajo kaj iskati,' which implies a clear ideological stance. The framing emphasizes Bratušek's rejection of Srdić and suggests he belongs to

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the statements made by Alenka Bratušek on social media, including her denial of recommending Srdić and her claim that he was opposed to the second track. It also correctly references the prior reporting by Info360 and raises questions about the basis for Bratušek’s cla

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, presenting Bratušek's statements and the follow-up questions without overt bias. However, the phrasing 'osobe, ki so aktivno delale proti drugemu tiru tam nimajo kaj iskati' may carry a subtle implication of judgment against those opposing the second

Nova24TV logoNova24TVParty-alignedConservativeFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 80
2TDK approved the request for the March drive of Bratuškova and Gobola: 55 thousand for stopping works and 652 thousand for acceleration

The infrastructure management company 2TDK has officially confirmed the existence of a cost claim filed by the construction contractor SŽ-Železniško gradbeno podjetje Ljubljana regarding a demonstration train ride on the unfinished second rail track between Divača and Koper. The claim, submitted in May 2026 and supplemented in June 2026, totals approximately 714,224 euros including VAT, comprising 55,853 euros for work stoppages and 652,259 euros for accelerated completion measures. This event occurred on March 1, 2026, just before parliamentary elections, when Prime Minister Robert Golob and Infrastructure Minister Alenka Bratušek rode an extraordinary train along the incomplete line. While 2TDK stated that such claims are standard practice in construction projects, they noted that the supervising engineer DRI has not yet issued a decision on the validity of the costs. The article highlights that 2TDK’s response did not clarify whether the specific work interruptions and measurements were necessary for regular testing or solely for the political event, nor did it explain the contractual basis for these additional charges.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the story through the lens of political accountability and potential misuse of public funds during an election period. By emphasizing the timing of the ride 'just before parliamentary elections' and listing numerous unresolved questions about the necessity of the work stoppages, '

Why factuality: no official source document/info detected

Why objectivity (80): The tone is largely neutral and informative, focusing on the procedural status of the claim. However, there is a slight intrusion of editorial voice through the inclusion of an unrelated link ('Svobodnjak burek...') and the final section title 'Open questions remain,' which hints at skepticism regar

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories