In the wake of a long-standing conflict between the United States and Iran, a significant development has emerged as both nations appear to have reached an agreement aimed at ending hostilities. However, the exact terms of the deal remain shrouded in ambiguity, with key issues such as access to the Strait of Hormuz, Iran's nuclear program, and the situation in Lebanon still under negotiation. The Guardian has compiled information about the main points of contention, including the strategic importance of the Strait of Hormuz, which serves as a critical passage for approximately one-fifth of the world’s oil supply.
On Sunday evening, former U.S. President Donald Trump made a decisive statement regarding the status of the Strait of Hormuz, declaring his full support for its reopening and simultaneously ordering the immediate lifting of the U.S. naval blockade. He urged ships around the world to resume their operations, stating, "Let the oil flow!" However, just an hour later, Trump was more restrained when speaking to the *New York Times*, indicating that the opening of the crucial waterway would be conditional upon the signing of an agreement scheduled for Friday. According to him, the purpose of this action would be to remove mines.
The involvement of Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, who acted as a mediator in the peace talks, adds another layer of complexity. In his initial announcement, he did not mention the Strait of Hormuz, while Iran's state news agency Mehr reported that the signed memorandum predicts the reopening of the strait within 30 days under "Iranian arrangements." This discrepancy highlights the ongoing negotiations and the need for clarity regarding the specifics of the agreement.
The global drop in oil prices following the announcement underscores the economic implications of the potential resolution of tensions. Despite uncertainties surrounding the details of the agreement, international oil prices fell sharply hours after the news broke, reaching their lowest level since early March, shortly after the start of the war with Iran.
One of the most contentious issues during the early stages of the ceasefire discussions was whether Lebanon would be included in the agreement. Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi stated that the agreement clearly includes Lebanon: "A permanent and immediate end to the war on all fronts, including Lebanon." Mediator Sharif also confirmed that the permanent cessation of military operations includes Lebanon. However, Trump initially focused almost exclusively on the Strait of Hormuz in his early posts on Truth Social, without mentioning Lebanon. This could pose challenges for Israel, which did not participate in the negotiations and has not immediately reacted to the news of the agreement. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reportedly has internal political reasons for continuing the conflict with Iran and its allies, including Hezbollah in Lebanon. Further military actions could jeopardize any agreement between the U.S. and Iran, according to the Guardian.
Trump and Netanyahu have had several conflicts over Israeli military operations in Lebanon. Trump allegedly called Netanyahu "a f***ing lunatic" after an attack on Beirut and told him he would be in jail if it weren't for him. He then demanded that Israel agree to a ceasefire with the Lebanese Hezbollah.
The fate of Iran's nuclear program, a key reason cited by Trump for the war, remains unresolved. Trump reiterated on Sunday that "Iran will never have nuclear weapons," but Pakistani officials indicated that nuclear negotiations would continue for the next 60 days. Trump later told the *New York Times* that the U.S. might again attack Iran if an agreement on the nuclear program is not reached.
In a joint statement, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and Italy emphasized that they are prepared to lift sanctions in exchange for "clear and verifiable steps" by Iran regarding its nuclear program. Iran has consistently claimed that its nuclear program is peaceful and has refused to abandon enriched uranium, which is said to be located at three sites damaged in American attacks.
Trump faces political pressure to achieve a better agreement than the one from his first presidential term. Recall that Trump withdrew the U.S. from the multilateral Iran deal in 2015, which was negotiated under Barack Obama and saw sanctions lifted on Tehran in exchange for restrictions on Iran's nuclear program.
According to reports, the framework agreement between Iran and Washington does not include Iran relinquishing control over the Strait of Hormuz. The Iranian news agency IRNA wrote that Tehran will maintain its right to enrich nuclear material. "Iran does not commit itself in any way to surrender control of the strait," writes the Iranian news agency about the "main guidelines of the current text" which is in the finalization phase.
American President Donald Trump mentioned the possibility of signing a framework agreement already "this weekend," according to France Press. On the other hand, Iranian diplomacy indicated that "Iran has not yet made a final decision regarding the agreement." Reuters, based on statements from an anonymous Western source, writes that the "understanding memo" between the warring countries could be signed as early as Sunday, with Geneva being the most likely location.
Currently, Tehran offers most of what it wants, while Trump receives little except the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, according to Reuters. According to IRNA, the draft agreement predicts that negotiations on the issue of Iran's nuclear program will take place in a second phase, during a 60-day negotiation period.
Iran will negotiate "exclusively within the framework of the fundamental principles of the Islamic Republic," and will demand that the final agreement include "the right to enrich uranium" and "the retention of enriched material." The Iranian news agency Mehr, citing a source close to the Iranian negotiating team, published a text that presents itself as a draft agreement, predicting "a permanent and immediate end to enmity, including in Lebanon," and "60 days of negotiations to reach an agreement on nuclear issues and the complete removal of American sanctions."
The same agency notes that the draft includes "the release of $24 billion in blocked Iranian funds during the final, 60-day negotiation period." According to Mehr, the text also predicts the "lifting of sanctions on the sale" of Iranian oil and petrochemical products, the "complete removal" of the American blockage of Iranian ports, and mentions the need for the U.S. to pay Iran compensation.
The temporary agreement between the U.S. and Iran aimed at ending the war in the Middle East could be signed on Friday in the mountain resort of Buergenstock in central Switzerland, according to a statement released by the Swiss government on Tuesday. The Swiss Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced that it had been in close contact with the U.S., Iran, Pakistan, and Qatar regarding the possible signing of what they called a memorandum of understanding between Washington and Tehran.
"In this phase, the signing is scheduled for Friday, June 19, in Buergenstock in the canton of Nidwalden. The location was proposed by the Pakistani and Qatari mediators, as well as the U.S. and Iran," the ministry stated.
What does the agreement say?
President Donald Trump said on Tuesday that the interim agreement with Iran clearly defines that Tehran will not be allowed to develop nuclear weapons. He also said that Syria might be in a better position than Israel to disarm the pro-Iranian militia Hezbollah in Lebanon.
Speaking ahead of meetings with Qatari Emir Tamim bin Hamad Al-Thani on the sidelines of the G7 summit in France, Trump defended the 14-point memorandum of understanding with Iran, which has not yet been published.
"The only thing that really matters to me is that Iran never possesses nuclear weapons, and the agreement clearly and loudly says that," Trump told reporters, warning that "hell will break loose in Iran if it tries to acquire them."
American and Iranian officials will meet in Switzerland on Friday to begin detailed discussions and will have 60 days for complex technical negotiations. It is expected that they will cover issues such as the future of highly enriched uranium in Iran and the lifting of sanctions against Tehran. They are expected to address questions related to the future of highly enriched uranium in Iran and the lifting of sanctions against Tehran. It is anticipated that these negotiations will cover topics such as the future of highly enriched uranium in Iran and the lifting of sanctions against Tehran.
The conflict in Lebanon has significantly calmed down following the agreement between the U.S. and Iran, although fighting has not completely ceased despite the ceasefire agreement between the U.S. and Iran to end the broader conflict. One person was killed in an Israeli strike, and Hezbollah fired on Israeli troops in southern Lebanon.
Pakistan mediated: Agreement on immediate cessation of fire
Pakistan, a key mediator between Tehran and Washington, announced that an agreement was reached on Monday morning calling for a "temporary and permanent cessation of military operations on all fronts, including Lebanon."
The declaration brought relative calm to southern Lebanon, even though Israeli forces remained stationed on territory they occupied during the three-month war, according to Lebanese and foreign security sources.
However, sources noted several cases of violence, including an Israeli drone strike on a car in the town of Kfar Tebnit, where the driver was killed.
Hezbollah also fired drones and rockets at Israeli military vehicles, claiming they were trying to penetrate deeper into southern Lebanon. The Israeli army did not comment on any of these incidents.
Lebanon: Almost 3,800 dead and 1.2 million displaced
Lebanon has suffered the worst consequences of the conflict between the U.S. and Iran, with nearly 3,800 deaths and about 1.2 million displaced people due to the Israeli offensive against Hezbollah, a group supported by Iran, which opened fire on Israel on February 2nd in solidarity with Tehran.
The U.S. and Iran are nearing an agreement to end the war. Reuters has published some details. A senior official from the U.S. administration said that both sides have agreed on the text and that Washington expects
19 reports
N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7522 days agoIranian media have reported details of a potential agreement with the United States, suggesting that Iran would not relinquish control over the Strait of Hormuz as part of any deal to end the conflict.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a potential international agreement involving Iran and the U.S., but it does not take a clear stance or use biased language. It presents information without overtly favoring either side.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 75): The article provides details about potential negotiations between Iran and the US regarding the Hormuz Strait and nuclear enrichment, citing IRNA and Reuters. However, it lacks confirmation of the agreement being finalized and presents Iran's position without counterpoints from the US.
Telegram.hrIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 6519 days agoThe United States and Iran have reached an agreement to end their conflict, but the exact terms of the memorandum remain unclear. The final text has not been published, and details on key issues such as access to the Strait of Hormuz, Iran's nuclear program, and Lebanon were sparse. The Guardian reported on what is known so far about these critical topics. On Sunday evening, Donald Trump strongly supported the opening of the Strait of Hormuz and ordered the immediate lifting of the U.S. naval blockade. However, shortly afterward, Trump was more cautious with the New York Times, stating that re
Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides' statements without overtly favoring one over the other. It includes direct quotes from Trump and mentions Iranian state media reports, providing a balanced view of the situation.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 65): Article accurately reports on the US-Iran deal and quotes Trump's statements, but includes speculative details not confirmed by primary sources. It also frames the situation with some bias toward Iran.
Net.hrIndependentCenterFactual 82Objective 7318 days agoThe article reports that a temporary agreement between the United States and Iran aimed at ending the conflict in the Middle East could be signed on Friday, June 19, at the Buergenstock mountain resort in central Switzerland. The Swiss Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated it has been in close contact with the U.S., Iran, Pakistan, and Qatar regarding the potential signing of a 'memorandum of understanding' between Washington and Tehran. The location was proposed by Pakistani and Qatari mediators, as well as the U.S. and Iran. President Donald Trump emphasized that the agreement clearly states伊朗将
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the potential signing of an agreement between the U.S. and Iran without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from officials and does not exhibit clear bias through language or framing.
Why these scores (Factual 82 · Objective 73): The article provides specific details about the proposed location and date of the agreement, citing the Swiss government as the source. These claims align with the general consensus among other sources, though some specifics like the exact content of the agreement remain unconfirmed. The tone includ
Index.hrIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 7018 days agoFighting in Lebanon has calmed significantly today following an agreement between the US and Iran to end the broader conflict. However, hostilities have not completely ceased despite the deal. In an Israeli attack, one person was killed, and Hezbollah fired at Israeli troops in southern Lebanon. Pakistan acted as a key mediator between Tehran and Washington, announcing an agreement calling for an immediate and permanent cessation of military operations on all fronts, including Lebanon. The declaration brought relative calm to southern Lebanon, even as Israeli forces remain stationed on the领土他们
Bias read (Center): The article reports on the situation in Lebanon with a neutral tone, providing factual information without apparent bias towards any political side.
Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 70): The article accurately describes the ceasefire and ongoing violence in Lebanon but does not confirm the existence of an official agreement between the US and Iran. It cites sources but lacks definitive proof of the agreement's content or status.
Index.hrIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 6021 days ago Iran: The ceasefire agreement would lead to the reopening of HormuzThe article reports that the US and Iran are close to reaching an agreement to end their conflict, which would involve reopening the Strait of Hormuz and lifting the American blockade. Negotiations regarding Iran's nuclear program would follow.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It states the potential agreement between the US and Iran neutrally, without emphasizing one side over the other.
Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 60): Article provides factual information about the US-Iran deal and mentions the reopening of Hormuz Strait. However, it leans slightly towards Iran's perspective and lacks balance in presenting both sides' positions.
Index.hrIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 5021 days ago SAD and Iran close to agreement on ending the war. Reuters published some detailsThe United States and Iran have signaled that an agreement to end their conflict is nearing completion. A senior U.S. administration official stated that both sides have agreed on the text of the preliminary deal, with Washington expecting the signing of an initial agreement in the coming days. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araki said that although changes to the agreement are still possible, the preliminary deal shows that Iran has emerged stronger from the conflict. He claimed Iran has won the war against the U.S. Shortly after these statements, U.S. forces shot down several Iranian drones,
Bias read (Center): The article presents information from multiple sources including a senior U.S. administration official, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araki, and a Reuters source. The language appears neutral, reporting events without overtly favoring either side. There is no clear editorializing or biased framing.
Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 50): Article discusses the US-Iran deal and quotes Trump, but includes strong opinions and historical comparisons that lack neutrality. It presents a critical view of the conflict and its outcomes.
tportalIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 7018 days agoThe Swiss Ministry of Foreign Affairs has announced that a temporary agreement between the United States and Iran aimed at ending the conflict in the Middle East could be signed on Friday, June 19, at the Buergenstock resort in central Switzerland. The ministry stated it has been in close contact with the U.S., Iran, Pakistan, and Qatar regarding the potential signing of what they called a 'memorandum of understanding' between Washington and Tehran. The location was proposed by Pakistani and Qatari mediators, as well as the U.S. and Iran.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information without overtly biased language or framing. It reports on an event involving multiple countries and does not take a stance on the potential agreement or its implications. The tone remains neutral, focusing on the logistics and involvement of various parties.
Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 70): The article reports on Switzerland's involvement in the potential agreement location but does not confirm the agreement itself. It provides logistical details without verifying the actual status of the agreement.
Večernji listIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 7018 days agoFighting in southern Lebanon has calmed significantly following an agreement between the US and Iran to end the broader conflict, but violence has not completely ceased. According to Lebanese and foreign security sources, Israeli forces remain stationed in territory they occupied during a three-month war. Despite the ceasefire declaration, there have been several incidents of violence, including an Israeli drone strike that killed a driver in Kfar Tebnit and Hezbollah firing drones and rockets at Israeli military vehicles attempting to advance further into southern Lebanon. The Israeli armyhas
Bias read (Center): The article reports on the situation in Lebanon with a neutral tone, presenting facts without apparent ideological bias. It includes details from multiple sources and does not favor any particular side in the conflict.
Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 70): The article accurately describes the ceasefire and ongoing violence in Lebanon but does not confirm the existence of an official agreement between the US and Iran. It cites sources but lacks definitive proof of the agreement's content or status.
tportalIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 6518 days ago Fighting in Lebanon is quiet after the US-Iran agreementFighting in Lebanon has significantly calmed down on Monday, although it has not completely stopped despite an agreement between the US and Iran to end the broader conflict. One person was killed in an Israeli attack, and Hezbollah fired at Israeli troops in southern Lebanon. Pakistan, a key mediator between Tehran and Washington, announced that an agreement was reached early Monday morning calling for an immediate and permanent cessation of military operations on all fronts, including Lebanon. The declaration brought relative calm to southern Lebanon even as Israeli forces remain stationed on
Bias read (Center): The article reports on the situation in Lebanon with a neutral tone, providing factual information without apparent bias towards any political side.
Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 65): The article covers the ceasefire in Lebanon and mentions the conflict's impact but does not provide clear confirmation of the US-Iran agreement. The information is based on reported events rather than verified facts.
Telegram.hrIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 5518 days ago The US-Iran agreement has brought a calm to Lebanon, but not a complete peace.The agreement between the US and Iran has brought calm to southern Lebanon but not complete peace. Fighting has significantly decreased since Monday, though some incidents have occurred, including an Israeli drone strike that killed one person and Hezbollah firing at Israeli troops. Pakistan, a key mediator between Tehran and Washington, announced the agreement calling for an immediate and permanent halt to military operations across all fronts, including Lebanon. Despite this, Israeli forces remain stationed in areas they occupied during a three-month conflict. Lebanon has suffered nearly 3,8
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information without overtly biased language or framing. It reports on events objectively, citing multiple sources and providing details on both Israeli actions and Hezbollah responses.
Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 55): Article covers the ceasefire in Lebanon but presents a biased view favoring Iran. Some details are speculative and not fully supported by the primary source.
Novi listIndependentCenterFactual 70Objective 6520 days agoU subotu, predsjednik SAD-a Donald Trump objavio je na društvenim mrežama da bi sporazum s Iranom trebao biti potpisan u nedjelju, a da će se Hormuški tjesnac otvoriti za sve nakon potpisivanja. Pakistanski premijer Šehbaz Šarif naveo je da su SAD i Iran dogovorili okvir za mirovni sporazum nakon više od tri mjeseca rata, a očekuje se da će se početni sporazum potpisati u sljedećih 24 sata. Glasnogovornik iranske vanjske zemlje Esmaeil Baghaei upozorio je da ne treba komentirati datum potpisivanja, navodeći da se moguće dogoditi u nadolazećim danima, ali da se mora biti oprezan zbog oklijevanj
Bias read (Center): The article reports on international diplomatic developments without overtly favoring any side. It includes statements from both U.S. and Iranian officials, providing a balanced view of the situation. There is no clear ideological framing or biased language.
Why these scores (Factual 70 · Objective 65): The article discusses conflicting statements about the timing of the agreement and includes quotes from various officials. While informative, it lacks definitive confirmation of the agreement's existence or terms.
Index.hrIndependentCenterFactual 70Objective 6019 days ago SAD and Iran have reached an agreement, which will be signed in SwitzerlandThe United States and Iran have reached a preliminary peace agreement aimed at ending military operations across all battlefields, including those in Lebanon, and reopening the Strait of Hormuz for traffic. The deal is set to be officially signed in Switzerland. Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif announced this development, according to BBC. Additional details are still emerging.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a neutral summary of an international diplomatic development without overtly favoring any side. It includes multiple perspectives, such as comments from analysts and officials, but does not exhibit biased language or selective sourcing.
Why these scores (Factual 70 · Objective 60): The article states that the US and Iran have reached a framework agreement but lacks specific details or verification of the agreement's terms. It relies on external claims without independent corroboration.
HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicCenterFactual 70Objective 6019 days agoThe United States and Iran have reached an agreement to end the war, according to statements by Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and U.S. President Donald Trump. The official signing ceremony will take place in Switzerland on Friday. The agreement reportedly includes the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, lifting the U.S. blockade on Iranian ports, extending the ceasefire, and continuing negotiations on Iran's nuclear program over the next 60 days. Trump stated that the Strait of Hormuz will be opened without tolls and that the U.S. naval blockade will be lifted.
Bias read (Center): The article presents statements from both U.S. President Donald Trump and Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif regarding the agreement between the U.S. and Iran to end the war. It includes details about the terms of the agreement as reported by multiple sources, including Reuters, and does not明显偏
Why these scores (Factual 70 · Objective 60): The article reports on a claimed agreement between the US and Iran, citing Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Donald Trump. However, it lacks verification of the agreement's terms and presents the claim as confirmed without sufficient evidence.
Večernji listIndependentCenterFactual 70Objective 4515 days ago Only the dead see the end of war, and the winner is always the one who survives.The article discusses the ongoing conflict between the United States and Iran, noting that even a recent agreement between them does not necessarily mark an end to the war. It references U.S. President Donald Trump's statement that the agreement is not final and that military options could return if Iran fails to comply with the terms. The piece also reflects on historical conflicts where both sides claimed victory, such as the Soviet-Finnish War, the Napoleonic Wars, and the Iran-Iraq War. It argues that declaring a winner in any war is premature and highlights the long-standing tensions, not
Bias read (Center): The article presents a general reflection on the nature of war and historical conflicts without taking a clear stance on current events or political issues. It uses historical examples and quotes from various figures but does not exhibit overt bias toward any particular side.
Why these scores (Factual 70 · Objective 45): Article reports on the potential US-Iran deal but includes strong subjective commentary and criticism of the agreement. It presents a biased view and lacks objectivity in its analysis.
HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicCenterFactual 65Objective 6018 days ago The United States and Iran reached a framework agreement to end the warThe United States and Iran have reached a framework agreement to end the war.
Bias read (Center): The statement is neutral and does not include any biased language or framing. It simply reports the fact that an agreement was reached without indicating favoritism toward either side.
Why these scores (Factual 65 · Objective 60): The article briefly mentions a framework agreement between the US and Iran but provides minimal details. It lacks verification of the agreement's specifics or status.
HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicCenter11 days ago Trump says Hormuz is open and says, "I'll do what I have to do".US President Donald Trump stated he would do whatever was necessary if Iran did not adhere to their agreement with Washington. This comes after Trump and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkan signed a temporary agreement between the US and Iran following over three months of conflict involving attacks by the US and Israel on Iran, and retaliatory strikes by Iran against Israel and Gulf states with American bases. Trump emphasized that Iran should use the unfrozen funds to buy food exclusively from the United States, stating this money would support American farmers. Trump also claimed that the Strait of Hormuz is fully open. Iran's chief negotiator confirmed that Tehran agreed to establish communication channels regarding ship passage through the strategic waterway to avoid conflicts. Additionally, the release of $12 billion in frozen Iranian assets was finalized during talks.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both Trump's statements and Iran's responses neutrally, without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from both parties and provides context about the ongoing tensions and agreements.
Index.hrIndependentCenter18 days ago Iran Could Get Hundreds of Billions? Trump: Everything Is Signed, I'm Very HappyThe United States and Iran have reached a preliminary peace agreement aimed at ending military operations in the Middle East and reopening the Strait of Hormuz for shipping. The deal, which will be officially signed in Switzerland on Friday, includes provisions regarding Iran's access to a $300 billion fund and the payment of maritime services in the Strait of Hormuz. Details of the agreement are still being finalized. The announcement was made by Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif. The agreement has led to a significant drop in oil and gas prices.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about an international agreement between the US and Iran without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It reports on multiple perspectives and developments related to the agreement, including statements from various officials and entities, without明显的
Index.hrIndependentCenter19 days ago Sad in Iran signed an agreement. Israelis are dissatisfied: 'We will have to bring down the regime ourselves'The United States and Iran have reached a preliminary peace agreement aimed at ending military operations across all battlefronts, including in Lebanon, and reopening the Strait of Hormuz for traffic. The deal was announced by Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, who acted as a mediator. Key points include an Iranian agency stating that a clause regarding maritime service fees in the Strait of Hormuz was added at the last minute. Israeli Finance Minister said Israel would need to creatively dismantle the Iranian regime itself, while the Israeli Defense Minister stated Israel would remainin
Bias read (Center): The article presents multiple perspectives without overtly favoring any side. It includes quotes from both Iranian and Israeli officials, providing a balanced view of the situation.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenter20 days ago A U.S.-Iran deal today? The inhabitants are furious: "Death to him who yields!"American and Pakistani officials anticipate that today could see the signing of a long-awaited framework agreement to end the conflict between the United States and Iran.
Bias read (Center): The summary is purely factual and does not include any biased language, framing, or emphasis. The content is about an anticipated diplomatic development and does not involve political controversy or ideological framing.
Croatia
