ON
← Back to feed
King Phalo Airport bomb threat: EFF MP on board plane ahead of Malema Eastern Cape campaign
ZA🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives16 hr. ago

King Phalo Airport bomb threat: EFF MP on board plane ahead of Malema Eastern Cape campaign

Police responded to a bomb threat at King Phalo Airport in Gqeberha, South Africa, after an anonymous caller alleged a device was present on a FlySafair flight arriving from Johannesburg. The aircraft was detained upon arrival, and all 184 passengers safely disembarked while waiting approximately two hours for security clearance. A multidisciplinary response team, including bomb disposal units, K9 detection dogs, and hostage negotiators, secured the scene as investigations into the threat's origin began. Among those on board was Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) Member of Parliament Sixolisile Gxilishe, who stated she was not frightened by the incident. Party leader Julius Malema was not on the flight but was scheduled to begin a campaign tour in the Eastern Cape region.

King Phalo Airport in KuGompo City secured a FlySafair jet on Wednesday morning after an anonymous caller threatened a bomb on board. Police held the aircraft following the report, allowing all 184 passengers to disembark safely. The incident triggered a large-scale security response involving bomb disposal experts and canine units. Investigations into the origin of the threat remain active. The disruption began when airport passenger services received a phone call at 07:59 from an individual using a private number. The caller alleged that a device was present on the incoming flight. Authorities immediately notified the terminal supervisor and airport security, activating established safety protocols. The plane, identified as Flight FA388, originated in Johannesburg. Despite the alert, the aircraft completed its approach and touched down at 08:49. Police spokesperson Brigadier Nobuntu Gantana confirmed that the jet remained grounded as part of standard procedure. A multidisciplinary team rushed to the tarmac. This group included the Bomb Disposal Unit, K9 explosive-detection dogs, hostage negotiators, disaster management officials, airport security personnel, and emergency medical services. Gantana stated that the scene was under control and that investigators were working to trace the source of the call. She urged the public to avoid speculation while security agencies performed their duties. Among those waiting on the tarmac was EFF Member of Parliament Sixolisile Gxilishe. She traveled to the Eastern Cape ahead of a campaign visit by party leader Julius Malema. Malema was not on the specific flight and his arrival status in the province remained unclear at the time of the incident. Gxilishe described the process as a waste of time for business travelers. She noted that officials instructed passengers to leave their luggage inside the aircraft during the initial check. She expressed no fear regarding the threat itself. Another female passenger, speaking anonymously, recalled the shock of hearing about the security issue just before landing. She observed numerous officers surrounding the plane. Sniffer dogs were deployed near the fuselage. Although initially frightened, she said police reassured her to stay calm. The group waited approximately two hours for final security clearance. A police helicopter hovered over the site around 10:30 before departing an hour later. FlySafair spokesperson Kirby Gordon addressed the media regarding the incident. He clarified that the carrier was alerted to a potential security risk involving Flight FA388. The airline reported 182 passengers and six crew members on board, a slight discrepancy with the police figure of 184 total individuals. Gordon emphasized that the flight operated normally until landing. The company cooperated fully with authorities. He praised the crew and ground staff for handling the situation calmly according to safety standards. No subsequent flights were cancelled due to the event. Airports Company South Africa acted swiftly to resolve the crisis. Acting Chief Executive Officer Charles Shilowa announced in the afternoon that the threat had been successfully de-escalated. At 09:38, the pilot authorized passengers to exit the plane. A comprehensive explosives detection sweep followed, adhering to aviation procedures and local safety requirements. Shilowa assured travelers that all persons involved were safe. The airport returned to normal operations as the investigation continued.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

IOL (Independent Online) logoIOL (Independent Online)Party-alignedCenterFactual 95Objective 9823 hr. ago
Bomb threat reported on aircraft at King Phalo Airport in KuGompo, 184 passengers evacuated

An aircraft with 184 passengers was evacuated at King Phalo Airport in KuGompo City, formerly East London, after receiving a bomb threat from an unknown caller. The threat led to a coordinated security response involving the police's Bomb Disposal Unit, explosive detection dogs, and other emergency services. Police confirmed all passengers were safely evacuated and are now off the plane. Authorities are continuing to investigate the origin of the threat and have asked the public to avoid speculation during the inquiry.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a security incident involving a bomb threat at an airport, which is primarily a matter of public safety and law enforcement. There is no indication of political bias in the framing, sourcing, or emphasis of the report. The content focuses on factual details of the event and is

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reflects the core facts established by the cross-source consensus: a bomb threat via phone led to the evacuation of 184 passengers at King Phalo Airport. It correctly identifies the responder units (Bomb Disposal, K9, etc.) and quotes the police spokesperson accurately. There

Why objectivity (98): The tone is strictly journalistic and neutral. It relies on direct quotes from official sources and avoids speculative language or emotional adjectives, presenting the situation as a procedural security matter.

News24 logoNews24IndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 9516 hr. ago
King Phalo Airport bomb threat: EFF MP on board plane ahead of Malema Eastern Cape campaign

Police responded to a bomb threat at King Phalo Airport in Gqeberha, South Africa, after an anonymous caller alleged a device was present on a FlySafair flight arriving from Johannesburg. The aircraft was detained upon arrival, and all 184 passengers safely disembarked while waiting approximately two hours for security clearance. A multidisciplinary response team, including bomb disposal units, K9 detection dogs, and hostage negotiators, secured the scene as investigations into the threat's origin began. Among those on board was Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) Member of Parliament Sixolisile Gxilishe, who stated she was not frightened by the incident. Party leader Julius Malema was not on the flight but was scheduled to begin a campaign tour in the Eastern Cape region.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the incident primarily through the lens of the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), a left-wing political party. By highlighting the presence of an EFF MP on the plane and noting that her party leader, Julius Malema, was campaigning nearby, the piece contextualizes a security event as

Why factuality (90): The article aligns with the consensus on the main events but adds specific details (FlySafair flight, EFF MP on board) that are plausible but cannot be verified against the first article alone. The text appears truncated at the end ('Upon landing at the'), which slightly impacts completeness but doe

Why objectivity (95): The inclusion of the political figure (EFF MP) and her reaction ('not scared') introduces a human interest angle that is generally acceptable in journalism. The tone remains neutral regarding the security incident itself, though the focus shifts slightly toward the political passenger rather than pu

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories