ON
← Back to feed
Boeing 737 Max: Survivors are suing for millions in damages
Germany🏛️ PoliticsCenter9 days ago

Boeing 737 Max: Survivors are suing for millions in damages

The article discusses the financial settlements reached by Boeing with the families of victims of two Boeing 737 Max crashes. In the Ethiopian Airlines crash of 2019, Boeing agreed to pay $49.5 million, $29 million, and $28.45 million to three families. These settlements came after lengthy legal battles, though most families had already accepted confidential settlement offers. The article notes that 346 people died in the two crashes, both caused by faulty flight control software. Initially, Boeing blamed pilots, but later admitted to misleading regulators during certification. Under President Trump, charges were dropped, leading to a $243.6 million fine and a $944.5 million fund for victims. However, no executives faced criminal charges. Some families pursued civil lawsuits, but those involving the Lion Air crash were dismissed due to the plane crashing into the sea, which precluded jury trials. Boeing managed to settle these cases through confidential agreements. In contrast, the Ethiopian Airlines crash involved a land-based crash, allowing for jury trials, though Boeing again secured settlements.

Boeing has been ordered to pay $49.5 million, $29 million, and $28.45 million to the families of three passengers who died in the 2019 crash of an Ethiopian Airlines Boeing 737 Max 8. A federal district court jury in the United States reached this decision, marking a financial resolution for the families after years of legal battles. While most families have already accepted confidential settlement agreements, these rulings represent the culmination of protracted litigation. The two crashes involving the 737 Max model resulted in 346 fatalities, 189 in 2018 with Lion Air and 157 in 2019 with Ethiopian Airlines. Both accidents were linked to faulty flight control software, which Boeing had failed to adequately train pilots on. The initial investigation placed blame on the pilots, but as evidence emerged, it became clear that Boeing had neglected proper training for the new software. In 2021, Boeing agreed to a three-year compliance and ethics program with the U.S. government to avoid criminal prosecution. However, the company violated the agreement, prompting President Joe Biden’s administration to initiate a criminal proceeding. During this time, former president Donald Trump was still in office, and his administration chose to drop the charges. As a result, Boeing avoided prison time for its executives but settled for a fine of $243.6 million and established a $944.5 million fund for victims' families. Airlines received a total of $1.77 billion in compensation for the temporary grounding of the 737 Max fleet. Despite these settlements, some family members refused to accept the outcome. They attempted to take on the role of prosecutors, but Boeing's legal team successfully blocked their efforts. Civil lawsuits for damages continued, though they faced challenges. Families of Lion Air victims encountered setbacks because the plane crashed into the sea, denying them access to a jury trial. A single judge would decide their cases, making it more cost-effective for Boeing. This allowed the company to negotiate secret settlements and avoid verdicts. One of the attorneys representing the families misused millions of dollars, leading to further legal action. In contrast, the Ethiopian Airlines crash occurred on land, granting the families the right to a jury trial. However, Boeing managed to settle nearly all remaining claims through confidential agreements. Over 100 pending lawsuits were consolidated under a federal district court in Northern Illinois. Judges repeatedly used smaller case groups as precedents for juries, but Boeing consistently resolved these cases through last-minute settlements. The legal battle spanned seven and a half years, during which disputes arose over admissible evidence, witness testimony, instructions given to jurors, and whether victims could claim compensation for fear and pain before impact. Boeing’s lawyers achieved partial victories, including leveraging Illinois law, which limits compensation for non-physical suffering unless it results from physical injury. In November 2025, the first jury delivered a ruling, awarding $28.45 million to the relatives of Shikha Garg, an Indian UN employee who recently married. Boeing’s legal team played a crucial role in preventing the jury from learning about her pregnancy, which could have influenced the outcome. This case exemplifies the complex and prolonged legal journey faced by the families of the 737 Max crash victims, highlighting the extensive efforts by Boeing to resolve claims without facing public scrutiny or judicial accountability.

1 reports

heise online logoheise onlineIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 709 days ago
Boeing 737 Max: Survivors are suing for millions in damages

The article discusses the financial settlements reached by Boeing with the families of victims of two Boeing 737 Max crashes. In the Ethiopian Airlines crash of 2019, Boeing agreed to pay $49.5 million, $29 million, and $28.45 million to three families. These settlements came after lengthy legal battles, though most families had already accepted confidential settlement offers. The article notes that 346 people died in the two crashes, both caused by faulty flight control software. Initially, Boeing blamed pilots, but later admitted to misleading regulators during certification. Under President Trump, charges were dropped, leading to a $243.6 million fine and a $944.5 million fund for victims. However, no executives faced criminal charges. Some families pursued civil lawsuits, but those involving the Lion Air crash were dismissed due to the plane crashing into the sea, which precluded jury trials. Boeing managed to settle these cases through confidential agreements. In contrast, the Ethiopian Airlines crash involved a land-based crash, allowing for jury trials, though Boeing again secured settlements.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of Boeing’s legal and financial responsibilities following the 737 Max crashes, including the role of regulatory agencies, corporate accountability, and judicial outcomes. It does not overtly favor any political ideology or side, presenting facts about the U.S

Why factuality (85): The article reports on the legal settlements with families of victims from the Ethiopian Airlines crash and provides details about the number of fatalities and causes of the crashes, aligning with cross-source consensus. It mentions Boeing’s failure to provide pilot training for new software and the

Why objectivity (70): The article presents information in a somewhat neutral tone but includes emotionally charged language regarding the impact on families and the outcome of legal cases. The mention of political figures like Trump and Biden introduces a potential bias in how the resolution of the case is framed.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories