ON
← Back to feed
Rush Hour: Brij Bhushan acquitted in sexual assault case, Prashant Kishor wins Bankipur and more
India🏛️ PoliticsProgressive20 days ago

Rush Hour: Brij Bhushan acquitted in sexual assault case, Prashant Kishor wins Bankipur and more

A Delhi court acquitted Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh, former Wrestling Federation of India chief, in a sexual harassment case involving six female wrestlers, including Vinesh Phogat. Phogat and others expressed disappointment and stated they would appeal the decision. Singh, a BJP MP, called the ruling a cause for happiness. The case involved allegations of sexual favors demanded for professional help and multiple incidents of molestation. Meanwhile, Prashant Kishor of the Jan Suraaj party won Bihar's Bankipur bye-election, replacing BJP's Nitin Nabin, who resigned as a Rajya Sabha MP. In Madhya Pradesh, Congress' Ghanshyam Singh defeated BJP's Ashutosh Tiwari. The Supreme Court clarified that states can withdraw first information reports against youth protesters where permissible. The Assam government detained activist Pranab Doley under the National Security Act, with Congress accusing the BJP of using such laws to suppress dissent.

A Delhi court acquitted former Wrestling Federation of India chief Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh in a sexual harassment case involving six female wrestlers, including Vinesh Phogat. The judgment sparked disappointment among the complainants, who plan to appeal the decision. Singh, a Bharatiya Janata Party member, expressed satisfaction with the ruling, stating that he had vowed to take his own life if the charges were proven. The case emerged following protests led by wrestlers like Phogat, Sakshi Malik, and Bajrang Punia in January 2023, who accused Singh of intimidation and harassment. Seven complainants, including a minor, alleged that Singh demanded sexual favors for professional assistance and committed 15 incidents of molestation and harassment. One woman’s allegations were dismissed earlier. In Bihar, Jan Suraaj party chief Prashant Kishor secured victory in the Bankipur bye-election, marking his political debut. The election was necessitated by the resignation of BJP National President Nitin Nabin, who transitioned to the Rajya Sabha. Bankipur, located near Patna, is traditionally a stronghold of the Hindutva party. Nabin had represented the area since 2010 after shifting from the Patna West constituency due to boundary changes. Meanwhile, in Madhya Pradesh, Congress candidate Ghanshyam Singh defeated BJP’s Ashutosh Tiwari in Datia. However, the Hindutva party retained the Manjalpur seat in Gujarat. The Supreme Court issued a clarification regarding the withdrawal of first information reports (FIRs) against youth protesters, emphasizing that states can do so where permissible under the law. This directive followed concerns that the court’s July 28 order allowing continued investigations might impede case withdrawals. The Union government reiterated its commitment to granting amnesty to student demonstrators. The ruling comes amid ongoing debates over the balance between law enforcement and civil liberties. In Assam, the government invoked the National Security Act (NSA) against land rights activist Pranab Doley, drawing criticism from the Congress. The act permits detention without trial for up to a year. Doley was arrested on July 12 for participating in a protest against a hotel project near Kaziranga National Park. After being granted bail on July 29 by a sessions court in Golaghat, he was detained under the NSA the following day. The government alleged that Doley engaged in “suspicious foreign transactions from doubtful sources,” violating the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act. Congress MP Jairam Ramesh condemned the move as “vague and speculative,” linking it to the Modi government’s tactics of silencing dissent. Ramesh highlighted similar instances in Uttar Pradesh, where labor activists were arrested under the NSA for allegedly inciting violence during a protest in Noida. Two activists, Satya Verma and Aakriti Chaudhary, were booked under the act for organizing a demonstration demanding better wages. The protest, which drew hundreds of participants, saw over 350 arrests. Ramesh argued that the use of the NSA contradicts judicial orders granting bail and undermines the rule of law. He emphasized that the Supreme Court and multiple high courts have warned against employing preventive detention laws to bypass legal processes or extend incarceration unnecessarily. The Assam government’s NSA order cited 13 police cases against Doley dating back to 2017, alleging his involvement in foreign transactions. The order claimed his actions were prejudicial to public order and state security. Despite the sessions court’s findings that no evidence supported claims of deadly weapons or assaults on women officers, the government proceeded with detention. The NSA, which allows for extended detention, has been previously used against figures like Ladakh activist Sonam Wangchuk, who was later associated with a prominent youth movement in Delhi. The controversy underscores broader tensions between state authority and individual freedoms, particularly concerning dissent and activism.

Go to the primary sources (3)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

4 reports

Scroll.in logoScroll.inIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 6520 days ago
BJP weaponising NSA to silence dissent, says Congress on Assam activist Pranab Doley’s detention

The Assam government's invocation of the National Security Act (NSA) against activist Pranab Doley has drawn criticism from the Congress party, which claims it reflects a broader trend of the Bharatiya Janata Party using extraordinary legal measures to suppress dissent. Doley was arrested on July 12 after participating in a protest against a hotel development near Kaziranga National Park. Police alleged trespassing and possession of weapons during the demonstration. Despite being granted bail by a sessions court on July 29, Doley remained in custody as the Assam government invoked the NSA, citing suspicious financial activities linked to foreign sources. Congress MP Jairam Ramesh criticized these actions as vague and speculative, drawing parallels to similar incidents in Uttar Pradesh, where the NSA was used against labor activists protesting poor working conditions in Noida.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the use of the National Security Act (NSA) as an attempt by the BJP government to suppress dissent, highlighting concerns about the misuse of preventive detention laws. It cites criticism from the Congress party and references past instances where the NSA was used against laborers

Why factuality (85): The article discusses the use of the National Security Act against Pranab Doley in Assam, linking it to similar actions in Uttar Pradesh. However, it does not directly reference the Noida protests or the specific individuals mentioned in the primary source document. It focuses on a different inciden

Why objectivity (65): The article presents a partisan perspective, criticizing the BJP government and referencing the Modi government's 'familiar script.' This suggests a biased tone towards the opposition party and implies a narrative that frames the use of the NSA as politically motivated, rather than presenting a neut

The Hindu logoThe HinduIndependentProgressiveFactual 80Objective 6021 days ago
Congress slams Assam government’s use of NSA against land rights activist

The Indian National Congress criticized the BJP-led Assam government for using the National Security Act (NSA) to detain land rights activist Pranab Doley after he was granted bail. Congress spokesperson Jairam Ramesh accused the state government of misusing preventive detention laws to suppress dissent, citing Doley's involvement in protests against a proposed resort near Kaziranga National Park. The activist's arrest followed a district court's bail order that emphasized the intersection of ecological preservation and indigenous rights. Ramesh argued that the NSA was being used to undermine judicial decisions and highlighted a broader trend of BJP governments employing such laws to silence critics, referencing similar cases in Uttar Pradesh. He called for adherence to the rule of law and warned against the misuse of preventive detention.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the Assam government's use of the NSA as an overt suppression of dissent and criticizes the BJP for employing 'extraordinary laws' to silence critics. It highlights the misuse of legal tools to counter democratic activism, aligning with left-leaning critiques of authoritarianism.

Why factuality (80): The article accurately reports the Congress's criticism of the Assam government's use of the NSA against Pranab Doley. It provides details about the legal process and the activist's background. However, it lacks direct reference to the Noida protests and focuses on a different location and individua

Why objectivity (60): The article has a clearly political tone, using strong language like 'blatant misuse' and 'overreach' to criticize the BJP government. This indicates a lack of neutrality and a tendency to frame the issue in a way that supports the Congress's position.

Hindustan Times logoHindustan TimesIndependentProgressiveFactual 75Objective 6021 days ago
‘Modi govt's familiar script’: Cong decries NSA detention of Assam activist Pranab Doley after he gets bail

Pranab Doley, a land rights activist in Assam, was initially arrested on July 12 for protesting a proposed luxury hotel near Kaziranga National Park. After being granted bail on July 29, he was rearrested under the National Security Act (NSA) on July 30. Congress leader Jairam Ramesh criticized the Assam BJP government for using the NSA to detain Doley, calling it a misuse of preventive detention laws. Ramesh argued that the arrest was part of a broader pattern by BJP governments of using such laws to suppress dissent, citing similar incidents in Uttar Pradesh. The NSA order claims Doley’s activities threatened public order and state security, citing past police cases and allegations of foreign funding. However, the sessions court had previously noted that there was no evidence of deadly weapons among the protesters.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the use of the National Security Act (NSA) by the Assam BJP government as a 'blatant misuse' of preventive detention laws and criticizes it as part of a 'familiar script' of the Modi government. The framing emphasizes the suppression of dissent and highlights the actions of theBJP

Why factuality (75): The article covers the same incident as the previous ones, focusing on the use of the NSA against Pranab Doley. It includes some details about the legal proceedings and the activist's background. However, it omits specific information present in the primary source document regarding the Noida protes

Why objectivity (60): The article maintains a critical stance toward the BJP government, using phrases like 'Modi government's familiar script' to imply a pattern of behavior. This suggests a biased perspective rather than a balanced reporting approach.

Scroll.in logoScroll.inIndependentCenterFactual 30Objective 4020 days ago
Rush Hour: Brij Bhushan acquitted in sexual assault case, Prashant Kishor wins Bankipur and more

A Delhi court acquitted Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh, former Wrestling Federation of India chief, in a sexual harassment case involving six female wrestlers, including Vinesh Phogat. Phogat and others expressed disappointment and stated they would appeal the decision. Singh, a BJP MP, called the ruling a cause for happiness. The case involved allegations of sexual favors demanded for professional help and multiple incidents of molestation. Meanwhile, Prashant Kishor of the Jan Suraaj party won Bihar's Bankipur bye-election, replacing BJP's Nitin Nabin, who resigned as a Rajya Sabha MP. In Madhya Pradesh, Congress' Ghanshyam Singh defeated BJP's Ashutosh Tiwari. The Supreme Court clarified that states can withdraw first information reports against youth protesters where permissible. The Assam government detained activist Pranab Doley under the National Security Act, with Congress accusing the BJP of using such laws to suppress dissent.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced overview of legal outcomes, election results, and political actions without overtly favoring any specific ideology. It includes perspectives from different parties and provides factual reporting on judicial decisions and political developments without clear editorial傾

Why factuality (30): This article is unrelated to the Noida protests or the use of the NSA against Pranab Doley. It discusses entirely different topics, including a sexual assault case and election results. As such, it does not provide any relevant information about the primary source document or the related events bein

Why objectivity (40): The article is not focused on the topic at hand and therefore cannot be assessed for objectivity in relation to the Noida protests. Its content is irrelevant to the subject being rated.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories