On Wednesday, June 17, 2026, Birgit Skarstein, a prominent athlete and advocate for accessibility, experienced a distressing situation during her flight with Scandinavian Airlines (SAS) from Trondheim to Oslo. Upon arrival at Oslo Airport (Gardermoen), she was required to wait for assistance to exit the aircraft. During this time, SAS staff informed passengers via the public address system that the delay in the subsequent flight was due to her presence on board. This announcement included specific claims about her not having booked assistance within 48 hours of departure, despite evidence to the contrary.
According to reports, Skarstein had actually booked her assistance well in advance—on May 20—and received confirmation from SAS on the same day. At that point, there were still 28 days until her trip. Despite this, the airline's communication suggested otherwise, leading to confusion and frustration among both Skarstein and other passengers present.
The incident occurred on the same day that the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget) passed a resolution to review practices that hinder individuals with disabilities from traveling by air. This timing added a layer of irony and significance to the situation, as it highlighted the very issues being addressed by legislative bodies.
Following the incident, Skarstein expressed her disappointment and concern regarding how her personal information was shared publicly without her consent. She noted that SAS had chosen to broadcast documented false statements and sensitive personal data over the airport’s loudspeakers. This revelation sparked further discussion about the handling of passenger privacy and the accuracy of information communicated to the public.
In response to these allegations, Øystein Schmidt, the press spokesperson for SAS, issued an apology. He acknowledged the negative experience Skarstein might have encountered and stated that the company would conduct an internal investigation into the matter. His statement emphasized SAS's commitment to ensuring a positive travel experience for all passengers, including those with special needs. Additionally, he mentioned that SAS has been working collaboratively with health institutions, the Norwegian Olympic Committee, and Paralympic organizations to improve services for travelers with diverse requirements.
Tove Linnea Brandvik, leader of Norway's Disability Association, criticized SAS for its actions, calling them a significant misstep. She underscored the importance of the government reviewing all aspects of systems affecting individuals with disabilities, especially following the recent parliamentary decision. Similarly, Transportation Minister Jon-Ivar Nygård expressed regret over the incident and emphasized the need to follow up with airlines through the Aviation Safety Authority and ensure compliance with regulations aimed at providing good travel experiences for everyone.
Aleksander Hatlem, an attorney who was also aboard the flight, recounted his reaction to the announcements made over the loudspeaker. He described feeling frustrated when the woman responsible for the communication did not disclose Skarstein's name but insisted on informing passengers about the reason for the flight delay. Hatlem later sent an email to Skarstein detailing what had transpired, expressing his belief that the airline was attempting to shift blame onto the passenger rather than acknowledging their own shortcomings.
As the situation unfolds, attention will likely focus on whether SAS will take concrete steps to prevent similar incidents in the future. This includes examining protocols around passenger information disclosure and ensuring accurate communication regarding delays caused by special assistance needs. Furthermore, the broader implications of this case could influence ongoing discussions about accessibility standards and the responsibilities of airlines in accommodating passengers with disabilities. With the government already committed to reviewing relevant policies, the outcome of this particular incident may serve as a catalyst for more comprehensive reforms in the aviation sector.
3 reports
AftenpostenIndependent🔒CenterFactual 90Objective 6514 days agoA passenger with a disability, Birgit Skarstein, experienced delays during her flight from Trondheim to Oslo with SAS due to assistance needed upon disembarking. SAS announced via loudspeaker that the delay was caused by her need for assistance, which included sharing personal information and making incorrect claims about her failure to book assistance in time. Skarstein had booked assistance 28 days before her trip and received confirmation from SAS. The incident occurred on the same day the Norwegian Parliament decided to review regulations affecting people with disabilities traveling by air. SAS apologized for the situation and stated they would investigate internally. Representatives from the Norwegian Disability Association criticized SAS for mishandling the situation and emphasized the importance of reviewing aviation systems to ensure accessibility.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the criticism against SAS and the response from SAS, along with comments from the Norwegian Disability Association and a statement from the Minister of Transport. It does not favor one side over the other but provides multiple perspectives on the issue.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 65): This article provides clear and consistent details about the incident, including the timeline and confirmation of Skarstein’s prior booking. While factual, it uses phrases like 'overtramp' and references political context, which introduces some subjective framing.
DagbladetIndependentCenterFactual 88Objective 6014 days agoBirgit Skarstein, a top athlete, experienced delays during her flight with SAS from Trondheim to Oslo on June 17 due to assistance required for her mobility needs. SAS announced via loudspeaker that her presence caused the delay, despite her having booked assistance 28 days in advance. This led to the spread of inaccurate information and sensitive personal details about her. Skarstein criticized SAS for broadcasting these claims, while SAS apologized and stated they would investigate internally. The incident occurred shortly after the Norwegian Parliament decided to review regulations affecting people with disabilities traveling by air. Advocates and officials emphasized the importance of ensuring accessible travel for all.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the criticism against SAS and the response from SAS, along with reactions from advocacy groups and government officials. It does not favor one side over the other but highlights the controversy and calls for systemic change.
Why these scores (Factual 88 · Objective 60): The article presents the facts accurately, including the 28-day period and the airline’s response. However, it includes less relevant content such as the 'Spillet' reference and does not provide full quotes from Skarstein, potentially limiting objectivity.
NRK NyheterState / PublicProgressiveFactual 85Objective 7014 days agoBirgit Skarstein, an individual with mobility challenges, faced difficulties during a flight with SAS from Trondheim to Oslo after she had booked assistance well in advance. Despite this, she was delayed disembarking and had to wait on the plane. A staff member reportedly told her she could blame herself for the delay. Additionally, SAS announced a flight delay due to her situation, which led to confusion among passengers. Later, it was revealed that SAS had made incorrect claims about Skarstein’s booking, contradicting documented evidence. Skarstein expressed frustration with these misrepresentations and shared her experience publicly. Meanwhile, another passenger, Aleksander Hatlem, challenged the misinformation broadcast over the airport loudspeakers, noting that SAS did not disclose Skarstein’s name but still identified her through media references. This incident occurred shortly after the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget) unanimously decided to review practices that hinder people with disabilities from traveling by air.
Bias read (Progressive): The article highlights issues related to accessibility and disability rights in public transportation, which are central to political discourse. The narrative emphasizes systemic failures and the need for policy reform, aligning with progressive values focused on inclusivity and social justice. The
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): The article accurately reports the incident involving Birgit Skarstein and SAS, including her waiting for assistance and the subsequent delay. It mentions the 28-day gap between booking and travel, aligning with cross-source consensus. However, it includes emotionally charged language like 'kringkas
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
NO
