Lok Sabha clears bill to increase number of Supreme Court judges, without debateThe Lok Sabha passed the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026, increasing the number of Supreme Court judges from 33 to 37, excluding the Chief Justice of India. The bill was passed without debate, amid opposition members raising slogans related to the NEET paper leak and allegations of theft from the Ram temple. The legislation aims to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the Supreme Court and ensure faster delivery of justice. This follows a previous increase in the number of judges from 30 to 33 in 2019. The bill will now move to the Rajya Sabha for further consideration.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of the legislative process and does not exhibit clear bias toward either side. It includes the government's stated reasoning for the bill but does not provide opposing viewpoints or commentary that could indicate a leaning. The lack of debate during the passage
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the passage of the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026, by the Lok Sabha. It specifies the increase from 33 to 37 judges, excludes the CJI, and mentions the bill's progression to the Rajya Sabha. It aligns with the cross-source consensus and provides
Why objectivity (85): The article remains largely objective, focusing on factual reporting. It includes quotes from the government regarding the need for more judges but does not take sides. The tone is professional and balanced throughout.
The HinduIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 7520 days agoOn August 3, 2026, the Lok Sabha passed the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026, which increases the number of Supreme Court judges from 34 to 38, including the Chief Justice of India. The bill was passed without debate, despite opposition members raising slogans against unrelated issues such as NEET paper leaks and allegations of theft of Ram temple donations. A statutory resolution moved by opposition members criticizing the ordinance was rejected via a voice vote. The law minister provided brief introductory remarks before the bill was put to a vote and cleared. This follows another bill related to birth and death registration being passed without debate earlier in the week. After passing the bill, the Lok Sabha adjourned for the day.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a legislative action taken by the Lok Sabha, detailing the procedural aspects of the bill's passage without expressing overtly biased language or favoring any particular side. It includes mentions of both the government's actions and the opposition's response, providing a fact
Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports the passage of the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026, by the Lok Sabha. It mentions the increase in judges from 34 to 38, the lack of debate, and the rejection of the opposition's resolution. This aligns closely with the cross-source consensus and p
Why objectivity (75): The article presents the event neutrally but includes some background on the opposition's actions, which may introduce a slight bias toward the opposition's perspective. The mention of 'sloganeering' and the context of NEET paper leaks and Ram temple donations adds some subjective framing.
India
