ON
← Back to feed
Bihar should withdraw alcohol ban as it failed to curb crimes against women: Report
India🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives15 days ago

Bihar should withdraw alcohol ban as it failed to curb crimes against women: Report

A research paper by the National Council of Applied Economic Research (NCAER) argues that Bihar's alcohol ban, implemented in 2016, has failed to reduce crimes against women and has instead led to an increase in illicit liquor trade and alternative intoxicants. The report suggests that the ban did not achieve its stated goals of reducing domestic violence or redirecting household spending toward productive uses. It also highlights that the prohibition caused a significant drop in state revenue from excise duties and increased expenditures on enforcement and anti-smuggling efforts. The study recommends restoring liquor excise duty to pre-ban levels to boost state finances and address these challenges.

A new report suggests Bihar should reconsider its long-standing alcohol ban, citing evidence that the policy has not reduced crimes against women and has instead led to an increase in illicit liquor trade and other related issues. The findings come from a research paper published by the National Council of Applied Economic Research (NCAER), which analyzed the economic and social impacts of Bihar’s prohibition, introduced in April 2016. The report argues that the ban has failed to achieve its stated goals and has imposed significant financial burdens on the state. The NCAER study, prepared by a team of economists led by Ratna Sahay and presented at the India Policy Forum, highlights several key points regarding the effects of Bihar’s prohibition. One of the main motivations behind the ban was the belief that alcohol consumption contributed to domestic violence and that families would reallocate funds previously used for alcohol purchases toward more productive purposes. Women’s rights organizations and activists supported the measure, expecting it to curtail alcohol-related abuse. However, the report states that available data shows no decline in reported crimes against women since the implementation of the ban. In fact, the number of such incidents has risen during the post-2016 period. According to the NCAER researchers, the prohibition has coincided with an expansion of illicit liquor networks, challenges in enforcement, and instances of corruption. The report notes a significant increase in the illegal trade of alcohol, which has resulted in higher overall consumption, greater criminal activity, and a surge in the use of alternative substances, including illicit drugs. These developments have raised concerns about the unintended consequences of the ban, particularly in terms of public safety and health. The financial implications of the prohibition are also substantial. Prior to the ban, excise duties on alcohol constituted approximately 14 percent of Bihar’s own revenues in the three years before 2016. Following the implementation of the prohibition, the state faced a loss of this critical revenue stream. Additionally, the government incurred increased expenses related to monitoring, enforcement, and anti-smuggling efforts, adding to fiscal pressures. The researchers suggest that reinstating liquor excise duties to their previous levels could potentially restore the tax’s contribution to state revenues to around 14 percent, while simultaneously reducing expenditures on enforcement and anti-smuggling operations. Beyond the issue of prohibition, the NCAER report identifies several priority areas for Bihar’s development strategy. These include improving education, healthcare, governance, law and order, flood mitigation, private sector growth, and women’s empowerment. The study emphasizes the need for comprehensive reforms in these sectors to enhance productivity, drive structural transformation, and generate quality employment opportunities for Bihar’s youthful population. The report also examines the state’s public debt and fiscal sustainability, assessing the funding requirements for various reform scenarios. It recommends a multifaceted approach involving stronger revenue generation, more efficient public spending, increased central government support, and, when necessary, further borrowing. The findings of the NCAER report underscore the complex interplay between policy decisions and their broader societal and economic ramifications. As Bihar continues to grapple with the challenges posed by its alcohol ban, the call for a reassessment of this policy gains momentum, highlighting the need for a balanced approach that considers both immediate and long-term impacts on public welfare and state finances.

2 reports

Times of India logoTimes of IndiaIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 7515 days ago
Bihar should withdraw alcohol ban as it failed to curb crimes against women: Report

A research paper by the National Council of Applied Economic Research (NCAER) argues that Bihar's alcohol ban, implemented in 2016, has failed to reduce crimes against women and has instead led to an increase in illicit liquor trade and alternative intoxicants. The report suggests that the ban did not achieve its stated goals of reducing domestic violence or redirecting household spending toward productive uses. It also highlights that the prohibition caused a significant drop in state revenue from excise duties and increased expenditures on enforcement and anti-smuggling efforts. The study recommends restoring liquor excise duty to pre-ban levels to boost state finances and address these challenges.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the alcohol ban as a policy failure that has negative societal and economic impacts, suggesting that the current approach is ineffective and harmful. While it presents findings from a research paper, the emphasis on the negative outcomes of the ban and the recommendation to reintl

Why factuality (85): The article reports findings from a research paper by NCAER, citing specific statistics and claims made in the study such as the lack of decline in crimes against women and potential revenue gains from restoring liquor excise duty. It references the authors and the context of the policy change, alig

Why objectivity (75): The article presents the findings of the NCAER study but frames them as recommendations for policy change. While it remains largely factual, there is a subtle advocacy tone suggesting that the government should revoke the ban, which introduces a slight bias toward supporting the removal of the prohi

Deccan Herald logoDeccan HeraldIndependentProgressiveFactual 80Objective 7015 days ago
Alcohol ban in Bihar failed to prevent violence against women, govt should revoke it: NCAER study

A study by the National Council for Applied Economic Research (NCAER) suggests that the alcohol ban implemented in Bihar has not succeeded in reducing violence against women. The report argues that the policy's intended goal of decreasing domestic abuse and sexual assault has not been achieved, and recommends that the government reconsider or repeal the ban. The findings challenge the effectiveness of alcohol control measures as a strategy to improve gender safety, highlighting the need for alternative approaches to address violence against women.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the alcohol ban as an ineffective policy that fails to protect women, implying that the current approach is misguided. By citing a study that questions the policy’s success, the piece leans toward supporting policy change, which aligns with progressive advocacy for gender safety.

Why factuality (80): This shorter article summarizes the main claim of the NCAER study, stating that the alcohol ban failed to prevent violence against women and that the government should revoke it. It lacks detailed methodology or data sources but aligns with the broader consensus from the first article. The brevity l

Why objectivity (70): The article is more direct in its call for revoking the ban, using stronger language ('should revoke') which suggests a clear preference for policy change. This leans into advocacy rather than purely presenting facts, making it less objective compared to the first article.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories