Bosnia and Herzegovina has been officially placed back on the grey list of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), commonly known as Moneyval, after an eight-year absence. This decision marks a significant setback for the country's efforts to strengthen its financial systems against money laundering and terrorism financing. The move comes amid concerns over systemic weaknesses in Bosnia’s legal framework and regulatory mechanisms, which have drawn criticism from international bodies and experts alike.
The grey list, maintained by the Council of Europe's Moneyval body, includes countries identified as having serious deficiencies in their anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing measures but are committed to addressing these issues under increased international oversight. According to reports, Bosnia and Herzegovina will now face heightened scrutiny from global financial institutions and investors, potentially affecting its economic stability and investment climate. The decision was confirmed during a plenary session of the FATF held earlier this month in Paris, following initial recommendations made at a meeting in Helsinki last May.
Key factors contributing to Bosnia’s return to the grey list include the lack of implementation of critical reforms, particularly the establishment of a register of beneficial owners within the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. While the entity of Republika Srpska has completed this task, the Federation has yet to do so, leaving a gap in transparency regarding corporate ownership. Additionally, the adoption of the Law on Seizure and Management of Illicitly Acquired Property has been delayed, further undermining the country’s ability to combat financial crime effectively.
Despite recent legislative efforts, such as the proposed law aimed at restricting asset disposal to prevent terrorism financing and the spread of weapons of mass destruction, these measures were deemed too late to influence the final decision. Experts note that while progress has been made since the country was removed from the grey list between 2015 and 2018, the pace of reform has not kept up with international standards.
The government of Bosnia and Herzegovina has accepted an action plan from the FATF outlining 13 key tasks that must be fulfilled to eventually be removed from the grey list. These include enhancing risk assessments related to money laundering and terrorism financing, improving cooperation with international partners, strengthening oversight of non-financial sectors, ensuring timely access to accurate information about beneficial ownership, and demonstrating improved enforcement of sanctions against financial crimes. Implementation of these measures is expected to take at least two years, depending on the speed of reform.
The return to the grey list highlights ongoing challenges in Bosnia’s political landscape, where divisions among entities and political factions have hindered the passage of necessary legislation. For instance, the Social Democratic Party (SNSD) has reportedly blocked certain draft laws related to international legal assistance and asset management, delaying crucial reforms. Civil society organizations, including Transparency International, have emphasized the importance of establishing a comprehensive register of beneficial owners in both entities to enhance transparency and reduce opportunities for corruption and illicit financial activities.
International observers stress that while placement on the grey list does not constitute direct sanctions, it serves as a warning to global financial institutions and investors. This could lead to increased scrutiny of financial transactions involving Bosnia, higher operational costs for businesses, and reduced foreign investment. As a result, the coming months and years will be critical for Bosnia’s institutions, which must demonstrate a commitment to implementing reforms and fulfilling obligations set forth by international organizations.
The situation underscores the need for stronger political will and coordination among Bosnia’s entities and political actors to address systemic weaknesses in its financial system. With the support of civil society and international partners, the country still has the opportunity to improve its standing and work towards being removed from the grey list in the future.
16 reports
Dnevni avazParty-alignedCenterFactual 95Objective 8518 days agoBosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) is set to be re-added to the Moneyval grey list, managed by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, which monitors anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing systems. This marks BiH's return to the list after eight years, placing it among countries with significant deficiencies in these areas. The decision was made at a recent Moneyval meeting in Helsinki, with the final confirmation expected at a plenary session this Friday. Key reasons cited include the lack of a registry of real owners of legal entities in the Federation of BiH and the un
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about Bosnia and Herzegovina being added back to the Moneyval grey list without overtly favoring any political side. It reports on the reasons provided by Moneyval and does not exhibit clear bias through language, sourcing, or framing.
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): The article provides clear and factual information about Bosnia and Herzegovina being returned to the Moneyval grey list, citing official meetings and reasons for the decision. The tone remains mostly neutral and informative.
Klix.baIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 8518 days agoBosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) is set to return to the gray list of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), also known as Moneyval, after eight years. This follows a meeting in Helsinki last month where a recommendation was made to place BiH on the gray list. The decision comes due to the lack of implementation of key anti-money laundering measures, such as establishing a register of beneficial owners of legal entities and adopting legislation on the confiscation of illegally acquired assets. While the Republika Srpska has completed these tasks, the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina has not.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about BiH's placement on the FATF gray list, citing specific reasons related to regulatory shortcomings. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. The content remains neutral in tone and focuses on reported facts
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): The article provides detailed and accurate information about the grey list and the reasons for Bosnia and Herzegovina's placement on it. It remains largely objective and informative throughout.
N1 Bosna i HercegovinaIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8015 days agoBosnia and Herzegovina's Minister of Foreign Affairs, Elmedin Konaković, stated that he expects Bosnia and Herzegovina to be placed on the grey list by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), known locally as Moneyval. He noted that this would be due to unfulfilled obligations related to anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing measures. The minister highlighted two key issues: the lack of an asset ownership registry in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the absence of an agreement on managing confiscated assets at the state level.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced summary of the minister's statements without overtly favoring any political side. It includes direct quotes from Konaković and outlines the reasons provided for Bosnia and Herzegovina's potential placement on the grey list. There is no evident bias in framing or word-
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 80): The article accurately reports on Konaković's expectations regarding the grey list and provides context about the reasons. It maintains a fairly neutral tone despite quoting a government official.
N1 Bosna i HercegovinaIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8018 days ago I could be back on the Moneywall grey list on Friday after eight years.Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) may return to the grey list of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), known as Moneyval, after eight years, according to reports citing unnamed sources familiar with the process. The decision was reportedly made at a May meeting in Helsinki, where it was concluded that BiH has failed to meet key obligations previously set for it. A final confirmation is expected at a plenary session this week. If confirmed, BiH would once again be listed among countries identified by international experts as having serious deficiencies in their systems to prevent money laundering,
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It reports on potential regulatory actions against Bosnia and Herzegovina based on external evaluations, without taking a clear stance on the issue.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 80): The article accurately reports on the potential return to the Moneyval grey list, citing sources and providing context about the reasons. While slightly leaning towards explaining the implications, it maintains a relatively objective stance.
OslobođenjeIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 7515 days agoBosnia and Herzegovina's Minister of Foreign Affairs, Elmedin Konaković, stated that he expects Bosnia and Herzegovina to end up on Moneyval's 'gray list' due to obligations that have not been fulfilled. He highlighted two main issues: the lack of a registry of real property owners in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the refusal of representatives of the SNSD party to discuss the management of confiscated assets at the state level. Konaković mentioned that discussions had even been open to transferring these assets to entities and municipalities but were rejected by the SNSD.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a direct quote from the Minister of Foreign Affairs without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It reports on his expectations regarding Bosnia and Herzegovina's potential placement on Moneyval's gray list and mentions specific points raised by him, including the SNSD
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 75): The article presents factual information about the situation with the grey list and quotes Konaković accurately. However, it includes some subjective commentary about political actors, slightly affecting objectivity.
Klix.baIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7517 days ago What is the Register of Real Property Owners, one of the key conditions that would have landed me on the Moneyval grey listThe article discusses the Register of Beneficial Owners, a key requirement set by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), which Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) failed to meet, leading to its placement on FATF's grey list. The register was established by the Republika Srpska government but not implemented by the Federation of BiH, where the Ministry of Justice did not act promptly. The article explains what the register entails—tracking individuals who truly control companies, even if they are not formally listed as owners—and highlights its importance for transparency and anti-money laundering.
Bias read (Center): The article provides a factual explanation of the Register of Beneficial Owners and outlines the reasons why BiH was placed on the grey list. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. The tone remains neutral, focusing on the procedural failure of the F
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 75): The article provides detailed information about the Register of Beneficial Owners and its relevance to Bosnia and Herzegovina being placed on the grey list by MONEYVAL. The facts appear consistent with general knowledge of the situation, though some details may lack specific sourcing. The tone is in
Dnevni avazParty-alignedRightFactual 85Objective 6517 days ago We're on the grey list because Konakovic and the Troika didn't list assets in the Federation, where there is no SNSD.Staša Košarac, zamjenik predsjedavajućeg Vijeća ministara Bosne i Hercegovine (BiH), optužuje Elmedina Konakovića i ostale članove 'Trojke' za pokušaj da odgovornost za nefunkcionalnost Federacije BiH prebace na Republiku Srpsku i zajedničke institucije. Košarac navodi da 'Trojka' ne može uspješno kritizirati SNSD, jer je SNSD 'tvrd orah za Trojku'. Također ističe da 'Trojka' optužuje SNSD za to što BiH dospjela na sivu listu Moneyvala, ali zapravo je problem u tome što FBiH nije uspostavila registar stvarnih vlasnika pravnih lica.
Bias read (Right): The article presents a strong critique of the 'Trojka' coalition, accusing them of shifting blame onto the SNSD and failing to manage processes effectively. The language used by Staša Košarac is highly critical of the 'Trojka', using phrases like 'lazju čim zinu' (they lie as soon as they open their
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 65): The article provides factual details about the grey list and quotes Košarac accurately. However, it has a clear political bias, criticizing Konaković and the Trika, which affects its neutrality.
N1 Bosna i HercegovinaIndependentCenterFactual 50Objective 5018 days ago I could return to MONEYVAL's grey list on Friday after eight yearsBosnia and Herzegovina may be returned to the MONEYVAL grey list following an evaluation by the Council of Europe body, which assesses countries' efforts against money laundering and terrorist financing. According to Politicki.ba, the country has failed to meet several key obligations, including establishing a beneficial ownership register and enacting legislation for asset confiscation. A final decision is expected at a plenary session later this week.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It reports on an evaluation by MONEYVAL and cites Politicki.ba as the source, providing details on the reasons for potential placement on the grey list without taking a clear stance or emphasizing oneside
N1 Bosna i HercegovinaIndependentCenterFactual 50Objective 4016 days ago Diary: EU calls for reforms, BiH from Friday on the grey list of MoneyvalThe article discusses Bosnia and Herzegovina's (BiH) placement on the grey list by MONEYVAL following calls for reforms from the European Union.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on an event (MONEYVAL listing) and mentions the EU calling for reforms without taking a stance or using biased language. It appears to present the information neutrally.
Why these scores (Factual 50 · Objective 40): The article is incomplete and appears to be a template or placeholder. It contains no substantive information about the European Parliament resolution or related events, making it difficult to assess factual accuracy or objectivity.
Dnevni avazParty-alignedCenter14 days ago I'd be put back on the FATF's grey listThe Financial Action Task Force (FATF) has updated its list of jurisdictions under enhanced monitoring, including Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) and Iraq. This 'grey list' includes countries with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering, counter-terrorism financing, and preventing the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, but which have committed to addressing these issues within agreed timelines and under increased oversight. The inclusion does not automatically trigger deep analysis measures but emphasizes a risk-based approach. BiH faces new international scrutiny of its financial system and is expected to accelerate implementation of measures outlined in its action plan to address identified shortcomings. Other countries on the list include Algeria, Angola, Bolivia, Bulgaria, Cameroon, Ivory Coast, Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, Kenya, Laos, Lebanon, Monaco, Namibia, Nepal, South Sudan, Syria, Venezuela, Vietnam, British Virgin Islands, and Yemen. Since June 2026, BiH has committed to cooperating with FATF and MONEYVAL to strengthen its regime against money laundering and terrorism financing. Progress since December 2024 includes developing a comprehensive A-
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about BiH being placed on the FATF grey list, explaining the criteria, implications, and progress made by BiH. It avoids overtly biased language, provides context about the FATF process, and mentions both challenges and efforts by BiH without taking a clear立场
Klix.baIndependentCenter14 days ago Bad news for our country: FATF would put BH on the list of countries under enhanced surveillanceBosnia and Herzegovina has been placed under increased monitoring by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), an international organization that sets global standards for preventing money laundering and terrorist financing. The decision follows a recent evaluation report highlighting strategic deficiencies in Bosnia's systems to combat these issues. While some progress has been made since December 2024, including the development of an anti-money laundering strategy and improved data sharing between financial institutions, significant challenges remain. The country must now implement an action plan with FATF to address risks, strengthen oversight of non-financial sectors, ensure accurate legal entity data, improve investigations into money laundering cases, and demonstrate effective enforcement of sanctions against violations. This designation could have serious economic and reputational consequences for Bosnia, though direct impacts on citizens may not be immediate.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the FATF's decision and outlines specific actions required by Bosnia and Herzegovina without overtly favoring any political side. It includes quotes from the Ministry of Security and references the FATF report directly, maintaining neutrality in tone.
OslobođenjeIndependentLeft14 days ago The SDA has strongly called on the authorities to put BiH on the Moneyval grey listThe Social Democratic Alliance (SDA) has strongly criticized the government of Bosnia and Herzegovina for placing the country on Moneyval's 'gray list,' which indicates deficiencies in anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing measures. According to SDA, this status will create additional challenges for businesses dealing with foreign partners, including delayed financial transactions and reduced investment flows, further weakening an already struggling economy. The SDA claims that the ruling coalition parties—Socialist Party of Bosnia and Herzegovina (SNSD), Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ), and the Three (Trojka)—have failed to address these issues, shifting blame among themselves and focusing on pre-election campaigns instead. The SDA highlights that despite warnings and clear requirements set in 2024, the state-level government has not adopted critical legislation related to international legal assistance in criminal matters or asset seizure laws. Additionally, the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina has not implemented a register of real property owners, raising concerns about transparency and potential conflicts of interest.
Bias read (Left): The article presents a strong critique of the current government by the opposition SDA party, using language that emphasizes the failure of the ruling coalition and frames the situation as a crisis caused by political negligence. The tone is critical of the government’s actions and highlights the SД
OslobođenjeIndependentCenter14 days ago Businessmen in BiH are worried about the consequences of putting their country on the Moneyval grey listBosnia and Herzegovina has been placed on the grey list by MONEYVAL, an organization under the Council of Europe tasked with monitoring money laundering. This decision follows the country's failure to meet certain requirements, including the adoption of a national law regulating assets derived from criminal activity and the establishment of a register of real owners of legal entities in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The move risks damaging the country's financial reputation, potentially deterring foreign investors and complicating international transactions for both businesses and citizens. Business leaders expressed concerns over increased costs, slower international transactions, additional checks on imports and exports, and potential difficulties in obtaining foreign credit and financial aid. While investment in Bosnia and Herzegovina is unlikely to halt entirely, the grey listing could make the country less attractive to investors and impose stricter procedures on financial transactions.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the issue of Bosnia and Herzegovina being placed on the MONEYVAL grey list and discusses the economic implications from the perspective of business leaders. It does not exhibit clear ideological bias, as it focuses on the practical consequences of the listing without taking a立场.
OslobođenjeIndependentCenter15 days ago Bosnia and Herzegovina and officially ended up on Moneyval's grey listBosnia and Herzegovina has officially been placed on the grey list by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), following a decision made during a plenary session in Paris. This placement comes after recommendations from MONEYVAL, an European body assessing the effectiveness of anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing measures. The decision was confirmed by FATF, concluding a process that had been ongoing for months and discussed publicly since earlier this year. The government of Bosnia and Herzegovina has accepted an action plan proposed by FATF, committing to implement necessary reforms to address identified deficiencies in their system. The country now faces 13 key tasks to remove itself from the grey list, with estimates suggesting the process could take at least two to two-and-a-half years depending on the speed of reforms. Among the main reasons for the listing were the lack of adoption of certain critical laws related to international legal assistance in criminal matters and asset seizure and management. Additionally, the absence of a register of beneficial owners in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina remained a significant concern for international bodies.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation objectively, citing the official decision by FATF and the response by the government of Bosnia and Herzegovina. It outlines the reasons for the grey-listing and the steps required for removal without showing clear favoritism toward any side. The language remains un
N1 Bosna i HercegovinaIndependentCenter15 days ago I'd be put back on the FATF's grey listBosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) has been added to the 'grey list' by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), which monitors countries with strategic deficiencies in anti-money laundering, counter-terrorism financing, and weapons-of-mass-destruction financing systems but committed to addressing these issues within agreed timelines under enhanced supervision. The inclusion does not automatically trigger deep analysis measures but emphasizes risk-based approaches. BiH is expected to accelerate implementation of its action plan to address identified weaknesses. Other countries on the list include Algeria, Angola, Bolivia, Bulgaria, Cameroon, Ivory Coast, Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, Kenya, Laos, Lebanon, Monaco, Namibia, Nepal, South Sudan, Syria, Venezuela, Vietnam, British Virgin Islands, and Yemen. In June 2026, BiH pledged cooperation with FATF and MONEYVAL to strengthen its anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing regime. Since adopting its Mutual Evaluation Report (MER) in December 2024, BiH has made progress, including developing a comprehensive strategy against money laundering and terrorism financing, guidelines for financial institutions and non-financial, 2
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about Bosnia and Herzegovina being placed on the FATF grey list, detailing the reasons, implications, and steps taken by BiH to address the issues. It includes balanced reporting on the situation, referencing official statements from FATF and BiH's actions, 2
N1 Bosna i HercegovinaIndependentCenter15 days ago Experts warn: Every day on the grey list will cost citizens and businessesBosnia and Herzegovina faces potential inclusion on a grey list by the Council of Europe's MONEYVAL committee, which would mark the country as high-risk for financial transactions. The government claims it has avoided an even worse scenario, such as being placed on a black list, through diplomatic efforts and political agreements. However, economists warn that the situation will have significant economic consequences, including increased costs for imports and exports, delays in business operations, and challenges in joining the SEPA payment system. Officials blame political parties like SNSD for failing to implement necessary legal frameworks and systems, such as a registry of real property owners. While the Federation's government has allocated funds for new software to address these issues, experts argue the problems are more severe than officially acknowledged.
Bias read (Center): The article presents multiple perspectives—government officials defending their actions, economists warning of negative consequences, and political blame-shifting—without overtly favoring any side. It includes direct quotes from various stakeholders, providing balanced coverage of the issue.
BA
