ON
← Back to feed
T.G. Mohandas arrest: Court pulls up police over procedural lapses
India🏛️ PoliticsLean Conservative7 days ago

T.G. Mohandas arrest: Court pulls up police over procedural lapses

T.G. Mohandas, a Hindutva ideologue, was arrested by the Thiruvananthapuram City Cyber Crime Police under multiple sections of Indian law for making derogatory statements against protesters at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi. The court later granted him bail, criticizing the police for not issuing a mandatory notice under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) prior to the arrest. The court ruled that the prosecution failed to provide sufficient justification for bypassing this legal procedure, emphasizing that notice is required for offenses punishable with up to seven years' imprisonment. While the police claimed the arrest was necessary to prevent the accused from evading justice or destroying digital evidence, the court found their claims unsupported by the investigation records. The case highlights procedural concerns in the handling of cybercrime cases involving politically sensitive content.

A teacher in Kerala has been suspended after a controversial question in a school quiz linked the name of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) ideologue V.D. Savarkar to receiving the "most punishment" from the British during India’s freedom struggle. The incident occurred during a "Freedom Quiz 2026" organized for lower primary students in schools across Kasaragod, Kumbla, and Manjeswaram educational sub-districts on August 6, 2026. Guru Prasad, a teacher at A.U.P.S. Pallathadukka in Kumbla, was suspended pending an inquiry after being identified as the person who prepared the question paper. The General Education Department confirmed the suspension and ordered a detailed investigation into the matter. The quiz, which included 15 questions and five tie-breakers, featured a question asking, “Who is the freedom fighter who received the most punishment from the hands of the British?” The answer provided in the answer key was V.D. Savarkar. This question immediately drew sharp criticism and sparked a political controversy within the state. According to the Director of General Education (DGE), the question was deemed to spread a misleading impression and was considered a very serious breach of academic integrity. The DGE also instructed the Deputy Director of Education in Kasaragod to begin disciplinary proceedings against the teacher and conduct a thorough inquiry into how the question was formulated and approved. The controversy quickly escalated beyond the classroom, drawing attention from political parties and student organizations. The Leader of the Opposition, Pinarayi Vijayan, accused the Congress-led United Democratic Front (UDF) government of allowing the RSS to influence young minds through a divisive nationalistic ideology. He claimed the government failed to prevent the inclusion of a politically charged question that allegedly whitewashed Savarkar’s role in the freedom struggle. Vijayan further alleged that the government permitted the Sangh Parivar to rewrite the history of the freedom movement from a Hindu majoritarian perspective. Student organizations such as the Students’ Federation of India (SFI) and the Muslim Students Federation (MSF) demanded an inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the question’s inclusion in the quiz. They questioned who prepared and approved the question paper, emphasizing the need for transparency in the process. The SFI state secretary, PS Sanjeev, criticized the UDF government, stating that it was attempting to create a role for the Sangh Parivar in the freedom struggle, despite their historical betrayal of the movement. He pointed out that figures like Savarkar had written multiple letters of apology to the British and were not actual participants in the freedom struggle. The General Education Minister, N Samsudheen, responded to the controversy by announcing that the DGE had suspended Guru Prasad pending the outcome of the inquiry. The minister’s office stated that the question was "historically inaccurate" and that neither the Social Science Club nor the General Education Department had authorized the independent preparation of the quiz or its distribution to schools. The statement emphasized that the person responsible for including the question held a prejudiced view and that strict action would be taken against those found accountable. The controversy also saw a response from the BJP, with State President Rajeev Chandrasekhar defending Savarkar as an important figure in India’s independence movement. He warned the Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) against interfering in matters related to Savarkar, asserting that the BJP would not remain silent if the education system attempted to alter historical narratives. Chandrasekhar also criticized the Congress for sidelining prominent freedom fighters like Subhas Chandra Bose and Sardar Patel in its portrayal of the freedom struggle. Meanwhile, the CPI(M) and its affiliated organizations continued to accuse the UDF government of colluding with the RSS to promote a distorted version of history among students. Former General Education Minister V Sivankutty alleged that the government was trying to "saffronise" Kerala’s education system and distort the history of India’s freedom struggle. He called for an apology from the education department to the public and students affected by the incident. As the situation unfolds, the focus remains on the findings of the ongoing inquiry. The education ministry has directed the DGE to submit a comprehensive report on the incident, including the roles played by individuals involved in the quiz’s organization. The political tensions surrounding the issue show no signs of abating, with both the Left and Right factions vying for control over the narrative around India’s historical legacy. The outcome of the inquiry will likely shape future discussions on the role of historical accuracy in educational curricula and the influence of ideological agendas in shaping young minds.

3 reports

The Hindu logoThe HinduIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8012 days ago
T.G. Mohandas arrest: Court pulls up police over procedural lapses

T.G. Mohandas, a Hindutva ideologue, was arrested by the Thiruvananthapuram City Cyber Crime Police under multiple sections of Indian law for making derogatory statements against protesters at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi. The court later granted him bail, criticizing the police for not issuing a mandatory notice under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) prior to the arrest. The court ruled that the prosecution failed to provide sufficient justification for bypassing this legal procedure, emphasizing that notice is required for offenses punishable with up to seven years' imprisonment. While the police claimed the arrest was necessary to prevent the accused from evading justice or destroying digital evidence, the court found their claims unsupported by the investigation records. The case highlights procedural concerns in the handling of cybercrime cases involving politically sensitive content.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the legal proceedings, focusing on the procedural issues raised by the court rather than taking a partisan stance. It reports on the judicial critique of the police's actions without overtly favoring either side. The emphasis is on legal compliance and due-

Why factuality (85): The article provides detailed information about the legal proceedings involving T.G. Mohandas, including the court's ruling on procedural lapses and the charges filed against him. It references specific sections of the BNS and BNSS, aligning with common legal terminology used in such cases. While no

Why objectivity (80): The article presents the facts in a neutral manner, focusing on the legal process and court decisions. However, it uses terms like 'Hindutva ideologue' which may carry ideological connotations, potentially influencing reader perception. The tone remains professional but slightly leans towards highli

Times of India logoTimes of IndiaIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 857 days ago
Who is Antara Banerjee? Actress held over alleged train clash, razor attack

Antara Banerjee, a 31-year-old Indian actress and model known for her roles in Hindi television and films, was arrested following an alleged altercation on the Aravali Express train. The incident reportedly occurred on August 12 when she was traveling to Surat for a shoot. According to reports, Banerjee had a sleeper-class ticket but was in an air-conditioned (AC) coach, leading to a disagreement over seating arrangements. Railway personnel and members of the Railway Protection Force (RPF) intervened, and she was later released on bail. This event has drawn attention due to her prominence in the entertainment industry.

Bias read (Center): The article provides a factual account of an arrest related to a train incident involving a celebrity. It does not take a stance on the matter, nor does it frame the situation with any ideological or political bias. The content focuses on the sequence of events and background information about the涉案

Why factuality (75): The article provides specific details about Antara Banerjee's arrest, including the date (August 12), the train (Aravali Express), and the nature of the alleged incident (dispute over seating leading to involvement of RPF). However, some details like the exact nature of the alleged razor attack are

Why objectivity (85): The article presents the information in a largely neutral manner, focusing on facts such as her arrest, the circumstances, and her career background. There is no overtly biased language or framing that suggests favoritism toward either the accused or the authorities. However, the phrase 'held over a

The Hindu logoThe HinduIndependentConservativeFactual 70Objective 6514 days ago
BJP calls arrest of Kerala Hindutva ideologue T.G. Mohandas discriminatory

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has criticized the arrest of T.G. Mohandas, a Hindutva ideologue from Kerala, calling it 'discriminatory' and suggesting it is part of a broader effort to shift focus away from issues like inadequate flood relief and protests by the coastal community. While acknowledging Mohandas's controversial remarks as unacceptable, BJP state leader S. Suresh accused the ruling United Democratic Front (UDF) government of shielding individuals who made threats against Prime Minister Narendra Modi from legal consequences.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the BJP's criticism of the arrest as a legitimate political stance while emphasizing the UDF government's alleged leniency toward those who threatened PM Modi. The language used suggests a right-leaning perspective by highlighting the BJP's opposition to perceived political bias,并

Why factuality (70): The article mentions the arrest of T.G. Mohandas but provides limited details about the nature of his comments or the specific charges against him. It references the BJP's stance but doesn't provide independent verification of the claims made by the party regarding the arrest being politically motiv

Why objectivity (65): The article exhibits clear bias in favor of the BJP, using terms like 'discriminatory' and 'drama' to describe the arrest. It quotes the BJP's statements without balancing them with opposing viewpoints or evidence, making the presentation one-sided.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories