Beyond national parks: Researchers explore a broader future for conservation
Researchers are advocating for a more expansive approach to conservation that goes beyond traditional national parks and protected areas. This comes as governments prepare to meet in Armenia for the U.N. biodiversity summit. The proposed strategy aims to recognize and protect regions where nature flourishes outside of officially designated conservation zones. Such an approach could include community-managed lands, private reserves, and other areas that contribute to biodiversity but are not formally classified as protected. This shift in focus reflects growing recognition that effective conservation requires considering a wider range of ecosystems and management practices.
Beyond national parks: Researchers explore a broader future for conservation As governments prepare to convene in Armenia for the U.N. biodiversity summit, scientists are emphasizing a new conservation strategy that identifies regions where nature flourishes outside traditional protected zones. Known as "Other Effective Area-Based Conservation Measures," or OECMs, these areas maintain biodiversity over time, even when conservation is not their main goal. They could assist nations in achieving the global "30 by 30" objective, conserving at least 30% of land, inland waters, coastal areas, and oceans by 2030. A team of researchers from institutions including the University of Exeter, Jersey International Centre for Advanced Studies, the University of Kent, Manchester Metropolitan University, and the University of Gibraltar has analyzed the emerging role of OECMs in global conservation policy in the journal Annual Review of Environment and Resources. Their study investigates how these areas can support biodiversity while acknowledging local stewardship, livelihoods, and cultural values. Catherine Wensink, lead author of the study and executive director of the UK Overseas Territories Conservation Forum, noted that many countries have already begun implementing OECMs despite ongoing global discussions around them. She emphasized the value of examining how these ideas translate into real-world applications, particularly on a small, biodiverse Caribbean island. The review outlines the necessary conditions for OECMs to provide enduring benefits, including effective governance, respect for rights, and resilience against climate change. These insights are especially pertinent to COP17, the upcoming meeting of governments under the U.N. Convention on Biological Diversity, scheduled for October 19–30 in Yerevan, Armenia. This summit aims to evaluate progress toward global biodiversity targets, including contributions from both protected areas and OECMs. OECMs expand the scope of locations recognized for their conservation value. Areas managed by Indigenous peoples, local communities, farmers, and private landowners can preserve vital biodiversity alongside other uses. The study includes diverse settings such as sacred sites, pastoral lands, orchards, and surf spots, along with less common environments like underground systems and thermal vents. Julia E. Fa, a co-author of the study and professor at Manchester Metropolitan University and the University of Gibraltar, stressed that recognizing an area as an OECM is just the beginning. Lasting success depends on clear responsibilities, sufficient support, and proof of ecological results. Additionally, implementation must honor the rights and decision-making power of the people managing these areas.
Researchers are advocating for a more expansive approach to conservation that goes beyond traditional national parks and protected areas. This comes as governments prepare to meet in Armenia for the U.N. biodiversity summit. The proposed strategy aims to recognize and protect regions where nature flourishes outside of officially designated conservation zones. Such an approach could include community-managed lands, private reserves, and other areas that contribute to biodiversity but are not formally classified as protected. This shift in focus reflects growing recognition that effective conservation requires considering a wider range of ecosystems and management practices.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a scientific perspective on conservation strategies without overtly favoring any political ideology. It discusses research findings and upcoming international discussions, maintaining neutrality by focusing on the content of the research rather than taking a stance on policy or党
The article discusses the urgent need for fundamental changes in how nature is protected, emphasizing that simply increasing funding is insufficient. It highlights the importance of valuing biodiversity as a critical component of safeguarding the planet for future generations. The piece suggests that current approaches to conservation are inadequate and calls for more comprehensive strategies to address environmental challenges. The focus is on rethinking policies and practices related to biodiversity preservation rather than relying solely on financial investments.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a general call for systemic change in environmental protection without explicitly favoring any particular political ideology. It does not use loaded language or selectively cite sources to support one side over another. The emphasis is on the necessity of reevaluating current st
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.