[Be The Good] Senator-judges, the people are watching

The impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte has drawn significant attention from the Filipino public, with many citizens actively following the proceedings through live streams and watch parties. This trial, which began recently, has become a focal point for national discourse, highlighting the importance of accountability in governance. As the trial progresses, the public's interest continues to grow, reflecting a collective desire to see justice served and transparency maintained within the political arena. Over the past few days, various groups across the country have gathered to observe the trial, each bringing their unique perspectives and concerns. In Quezon City, community engagement specialist Joan Alindogan and intern Francine Lauron participated in a watch party organized by the civil society group Bantay Senado. Their attendance underscores the community's involvement in the process, emphasizing the significance of public oversight in legal matters involving high-profile figures. Meanwhile, in Baguio, Mover and former fellow Joem Thayer engaged with students from the University of the Philippines-Baguio, who were also participating in their own watch party on campus. These gatherings illustrate the diverse ways in which citizens are engaging with the trial, whether through direct participation or observation. Freelance photographer Gomer Garcia, a resident of Quezon City, expressed his motivation for monitoring the trial on his phone. He emphasized the importance of witnessing the proceedings firsthand, especially given his role as a parent. Garcia believes that instilling a sense of responsibility for accuracy and facts in his children is crucial. His perspective highlights the broader societal implications of the trial, where the pursuit of truth becomes a shared endeavor among families and individuals alike. Student leaders James Rafael Barra and Sierra Andrea Luarez from UP Baguio articulated their primary concern regarding the trial: uncovering the truth behind the corruption allegations against Vice President Duterte. Sierra noted that Duterte, a former education secretary, must address these accusations transparently. Her position reflects the sentiments of many young Filipinos who are keen on understanding how public officials manage resources, particularly in sectors that directly affect their lives, such as education. Beyond the content of the discussions, observers are also paying close attention to the interpersonal dynamics during the trial. Maricel Aderiatico, another resident of Quezon City, expressed her disapproval of the senator-judges interrupting one another. She pointed out that the lack of respect shown towards fellow judges could undermine the integrity of the proceedings. This critique indicates that the public is not only focused on the legal arguments but also on the conduct of those presiding over the trial, recognizing that decorum plays a vital role in ensuring fairness and legitimacy. As the trial unfolds, the public remains engaged, eager to understand the nuances of the case and its potential outcomes. The ongoing dialogue surrounding the trial serves as a reminder of the power of collective scrutiny in holding leaders accountable. With each passing day, the trial continues to shape the narrative around governance, accountability, and the rule of law in the Philippines. Citizens are encouraged to participate in discussions and share their insights, contributing to a vibrant public sphere that values informed debate and critical thinking.