The political landscape in Tetovo has been thrown into turmoil following a recent decision by the Constitutional Court, which annulled 11 street names changed by the municipal council in 2007. This move has sparked a fierce debate between the opposition party, the Democratic Alliance for Integration (BDI), and the ruling coalition, Vatra e Lëvizjes e Re (VLEN). The BDI has demanded an urgent session to reconsider the names of these streets, arguing that the original decision was made with broad consensus and should now be reinstated.
According to reports, the BDI members in the Municipal Council have submitted a formal request calling for an extraordinary session where they aim to vote on the reinstatement of the old street names. Berat Murati, a member of the BDI, emphasized that the decision to change the names was made in 2006 with full agreement among all ethnic groups present in the council. He stated that the current situation requires immediate action to preserve Tetovo's history, dignity, and reality, adding that the city must not retreat backward but continue forward with its heritage intact.
Arbër Ademi, the General Secretary of the BDI, criticized the constitutional court's decision, describing it as a result of a majority-driven process. He pointed out that the decision was passed with five votes in favor and three against, with five Macedonian judges overriding two Albanian and one Turkish judge. Ademi questioned the logic behind the VLEN representatives' argument that the 2007 decision had never been in force, asking how such a non-existent decision could be annulled. He called these justifications absurd and suggested that they undermine public intelligence.
The dispute continues to escalate as both parties exchange accusations over the annulment of the constitutional court’s decision regarding the naming of streets and squares in Tetovo. Bajram Rexhepi from the BDI urged the Tetovo Municipality to hold an extraordinary session within two to three days to either approve or reinstate the 2007 decision. He warned that if the municipality refuses this call, it would be considered complicit in the controversial decision by the constitutional court.
On the other hand, Albion Alili from VLEN accused the BDI of orchestrating tensions between ethnic groups. He noted that the BDI had held power for 20 years and had the opportunity to address issues such as changing street names, playgrounds, or other institutions, yet they failed to act. Alili highlighted that the decision made in 2007 required approval from the government, which the BDI did not achieve despite being in power throughout these years.
The conflict highlights deep-seated divisions within the local governance structure of Tetovo, reflecting broader ethnic and political tensions in North Macedonia. Both sides are determined to assert their positions, with the BDI seeking to restore historical decisions and VLEN challenging the legitimacy of those actions. As the situation unfolds, the role of the municipal administration will be crucial in determining whether an extraordinary session is convened, potentially leading to further legal challenges or political maneuvering. The outcome of this dispute could set a precedent for similar issues in the future, emphasizing the need for clear legal frameworks and inclusive decision-making processes in multilingual and multiethnic communities.
3 reports
RTKState / PublicCenterFactual 90Objective 7514 days agoThe political parties VLEN and BDI have continued exchanging accusations regarding the annulment of a decision by the Constitutional Court concerning the names of streets and squares in Tetovo. BDI called on the Tetovo Municipality to hold an extraordinary session within two to three days to either adopt or re-adopt the 2007 decision made by the Municipal Council, which followed all legal procedures according to North Macedonia's laws. They stated they would fully support the council if it agreed to this request, but would consider the municipality complicit in the 'scandalous' decision of the Constitutional Court if it refused. VLEN countered that the Constitutional Court's decision was orchestrated by those seeking to create interethnic tensions, accusing BDI of having had 20 years in power to address such issues—including changing street names—but failing to complete the process, as the decision required approval from the government.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the dispute between VLEN and BDI over the annulment of a municipal decision related to street names in Tetovo. It includes direct quotes from representatives of both parties, presenting their arguments without overtly favoring one side. The framing appears balanced
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 75): The article accurately reports the exchange of accusations between BDI and VLEN regarding the annulment of the 2007 decision by the Constitutional Court. It quotes both sides fairly, though it leans slightly toward BDI’s perspective by emphasizing their call for an emergency session.
Gazeta ExpressIndependentProgressiveFactual 88Objective 7218 days agoThe Constitutional Court's decision to revert 11 street names in Tetovo, changed by the municipal council in 2007, has sparked conflict between the opposition BDI party and the Tetovo Municipality. BDI members have submitted a request for an extraordinary session to vote on the street names again. They argue that the decision was unanimously approved in 2006 with full political agreement and according to the Badinter principle. BDI emphasizes that the current situation does not require a double voting process under the Badinter principle in the Tetovo Municipal Council.
Bias read (Progressive): The article presents the BDI party's stance as seeking to uphold historical and cultural identity through the reapproval of street names, which aligns with left-leaning values emphasizing heritage and collective memory. The framing highlights the opposition's position without significant counterbal-
Why these scores (Factual 88 · Objective 72): The article accurately summarizes the conflict over the annulment of the 2007 decision and BDI’s demand for an emergency session. However, it emphasizes BDI’s historical approval of the decision, which might imply a slight bias in favor of their position.
Gazeta ExpressIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 7018 days ago Adam: How can a decision that, according to the VLEN, was never in force be overturned?Arbër Ademi, Sekretari i Përgjithshëm i BDI-së, ka reaguar ndaj vendimit të Gjykatës Kushtetuese për emërtimet e rrugëve në Tetovë. Ai ka kritikuar vendimin e majorizuar, duke theksuar se pesë gjyqtarë maqedonas kanë mbivotuar dy gjyqtarët shqiptarë dhe një gjyqtar turk. Ademi ka pyetur se si mund të shfuqizohet një vendim që, sipas VLEN-it, nuk ka qenë kurrë në fuqi.
Bias read (Progressive): The article presents criticism towards a decision made by the Constitutional Court, highlighting concerns over majority voting and potential biases in the judicial process. The framing emphasizes the critique of the court's decision and questions the legitimacy of the ruling, suggesting a leftward倾向
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): The article presents Ademi’s critique of the court decision and VLEN’s stance, but it frames the issue as a majority-driven outcome, potentially implying bias. The questioning of VLEN’s logic is presented neutrally but may subtly favor BDI’s position.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
XK
%2Ffile%2Fauthors%2F1535352089385316383.jpg&w=3840&q=75&output=webp&we)
